The relationship between innovation competence and performance as an effect on the sustainability of SMEs

• Autorzy: Kim Seok-Soo

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.12

Warianty tytułu

PL

Związek pomiędzy kompetencjami w zakresie innowacji a wydajnością jako wpływ na zrównoważony rozwój MŚP

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Overcoming the failures of SMEs worldwide in the aftermath of COVID-19 in 2020 is an essential issue for countries and SMEs. A research question was raised that there will be variables that affect the sustainable growth of SMEs. This study aims to find out the relationship between performance and necessary competencies according to industry classification for sustainable growth of SMEs. 205 CEOs of SMEs in Korea were surveyed and verified using Smart PLS. The findings are, first, the difference in the performance of SMEs by industry through the mediating effect of technological capabilities. Second, variables that influence the performance of SMEs were management and technology, technology marketing and technical competence in technology innovation. Third, variables affecting the industry's performance were different, with the most significant increase in the IT/SW industry.

PL

Przezwyciężenie niepowodzeń MŚP na całym świecie w następstwie COVID-19 w 2020 r. jest zasadniczą kwestią dla krajów i MŚP. Postawiono pytanie badawcze, czy będą zmienne, które wpływają na zrównoważony rozwój MŚP. Niniejsze badanie ma na celu ustalenie związku między wynikami a niezbędnymi kompetencjami zgodnie z klasyfikacją branżową dla zrównoważonego rozwoju MŚP. 205 dyrektorów generalnych MŚP w Korei zostało przebadanych i zweryfikowanych za pomocą Smart PLS. Ustalenia dotyczą, po pierwsze, różnicy w wynikach MŚP w poszczególnych gałęziach przemysłu poprzez pośredniczący wpływ możliwości technologicznych. Po drugie, zmienne, które wpływają na wyniki MŚP to zarządzanie i technologia, marketing technologiczny oraz kompetencje techniczne w zakresie innowacji technologicznych. Po trzecie, zmienne wpływające na wyniki branży były różne, z najbardziej znaczącym wzrostem w branży IT/SW.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

SME; innovation competences; performance; sustainability; technology innovation

PL

MŚP; kompetencje innowacyjne; występ; zrównoważony rozwój; innowacje technologiczne

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 2
• Strony: 196--212
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 60 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kim Seok-Soo

• Hansung University, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Consulting, Korea

Bibliografia

• 1.Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American economic review, 678-690.
• 2.Alaa, N., (1996). Solutions faibles d'équations paraboliques quasilinéaires avec données initiales mesures. In Annales Mathématiques Blaise Pascal (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1-15).
• 3.Andreou, P. C., Karasamani, I., Louca, C. and Ehrlich, D., (2017). The impact of managerial ability on crisis-period corporate investment. Journal of Business Research, 79, 107-122.
• 4.Autio, E., (1997). New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research policy, 26(3), 263-281.
• 5.Bae, H.B., Song, M.K. and Kim, S.G., (2018). A study on the effect of competency of technology start-up companies using ETRI technology on management performance. Venture Entrepreneurship Research, 13 (1), 61-72.
• 6.Bailetti, T., (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology innovation management review, 2(2).
• 7.Bollinger, L., Hope, K. and Utterback, J. M., (1983). A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms. Research policy, 12(1), 1-14.
• 8.Booz, Allen & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980’s. New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton. Inc. 24p.
• 9.Burgelman, R. A., Sayles, L. R., (2004). Transforming invention into innovation: the conceptualization stage. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 682-690.
• 10.Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M. and Wheelwright, S. C., (2004). Integrating technology and strategy: A general management perspective. Strategic management of technology and innovation, 208.
• 11.Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M. and Wheelwright, S. C., (2008). Strategic management of technology and innovation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
• 12.Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R. and Carland, J. C., (1984). Differentiating small business owners from entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.
• 13.Carr, R. K., (1994). Doing technology transfer in federal laboratories. In From Lab to Market (pp. 61-87). Springer, Boston, MA.
• 14.Chandler, G. N., Hanks, S. H., (1994). Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(4), 331-349.
• 15.Chandler, G. N., Jansen, E., (1992). The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business venturing, 7(3), 223-236.
• 16.Clugston, C. O., (1995). High-Tech demands own new-product plan. Electronic news, 41(2094), 33-36.
• 17.Coombs, J. E., Bierly III, P. E., (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
• 18.Cooper, A. C., Willard, G. E. and Woo, C. Y., (1986). Strategies of high performing new and small firms: A reexamination of the niche concept. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 247-260.
• 19.De Franco, G., Hope, O. K. and Lu, H., (2017). Managerial ability and bank‐loan pricing. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(9-10), 1315-1337.
• 20.Dijkstra, T. K., (2010). Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold’s basic design and partial least squares. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 23-46). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• 21.Englis, P. D., Wakkee, I. and Van Der Sijde, P., (2007). Knowledge and networks in the global start-up process. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 1(3-4), 497-514.
• 22.Epstein, M. J., Freedman, M., (1994). Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
• 23.Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M., (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from?. American journal of sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
• 24.Hadjimanolis, A., (2000). A resource-based view of innovativeness in small firms. Technology analysis & Strategic management, 12(2), 263-281.
• 25.Hazlett, S. A., McAdam, R., Sohal, A., Castka, P. and Balzarova, M. A., (2007). A critical look on quality through CSR lenses. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
• 26.Hwang, D.S., (2017). The effect of technology entrepreneurs' strategic orientation and network capabilities on new product development performance and corporate performance. (master's thesis), Hanbat University, Daejeon, Korea.
• 27.Hwang, W. S., Choi, H. and Shin, J., (2020). A mediating role of innovation capability between entrepreneurial competencies and competitive advantage. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 1-14.
• 28.Itami, H., Numagami, T., (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 119-135.
• 29.Jeon S.Y., Kim H.S., (2018). Long-term care facility decision support system based on ICT provides customized case management services: usability and applicability. Korean Elderly Welfare Society Conference, 572-573.
• 30.Johannisson, B., (1986). Network strategies: management technology for entrepreneurship and change. International small business journal, 5(1), 19-30.
• 31.Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., (1996). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California management review, 39(1), 53-79.
• 32.Kim, J., Cho, J. and Lee, S., (2020). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Competences on Corporate Performance of Technology-based Start-ups. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 43(1), 132-142.
• 33.Kim, J. Y., Bang, H. Y., (2017). The Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on the Impact Strategy and Performance of Korean, US, and Japanese Firms: Focusing on Environmental Uncertainty in the Competition Sector. Korean Journal of Trade and Commerce, 17(4), 135-156.
• 34.Kim, K. C., Suh, B. D., (2017). The Effects of Social Enterprise Characteristics and CEO’s Management Capability on Business Performance: Focusing on Mediating Effects of Corporate Reputation. The Journal of Eurasian Studies, 14(2), 47-80.
• 35.Kim, S.Y., (2014). A Study on the Corporate Exit Strategy of the owners of small and medium-sized enterprises - focused on the business succession of small and medium-sized enterprises. (master's thesis), Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
• 36.Kim, Y. K., Park, S. T., (2018). Effects of Absorptive Capacity on Technology Innovation and Commercialization Capacities and Management Performance. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(12), 217-225.
• 37.Kogut, B., Shan, W. and Walker, G., (1992). The make-or-cooperate decision in the context of an industry network. Networks and organizations, 348-65.
• 38.Kwon, O.H., (2009). Venture company's EXIT strategy and case study by type. (master's thesis), Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
• 39.Lee I.K., (2017). An empirical study on the effect of SME CEO technology competency on management performance. (doctoral dissertation), Hoseo University, Seoul, Korea.
• 40.Lester, D. H., (1998). Critical success factors for new product development. Research-Technology Management, 41(1), 36-43.
• 41.Lee I.K., (2017). An empirical study on the effect of SME CEO technology competency on management performance. (doctoral dissertation), Hoseo University, Seoul, Korea.
• 42.McCutchen Jr, W. W., Swamidass, P. M., (1996). Effect of R&D expenditures and funding strategies on the market value of biotech firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(4), 287-299.
• 43.Miller, P., Power, M., (2005). Calculating corporate failure, Professional Competition and Professional Power. (pp. 65-90), Routledge,
• 44.Nevens, T. M., (1990). Commercializing technology: what the best companies do. Planning review.
• 45.Park, H.G., Yang, D.W., (2018). An Empirical Study on the Effect of the Technological Commercialization Ability of the Initial Entrepreneurship on Management Performance: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Technology Entrepreneurs in Manufacturing Industries. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 1(1), 14.
• 46.Pauceanu, A. M., Alpenidze, O., Edu, T. and Zaharia, R. M., (2019). What determinants influence students to start their own business? Empirical evidence from United Arab Emirates Universities. Sustainability, 11(1), 92.
• 47.Pirzada, K., Mustapha, M. Z. and Alfan, E. B., (2017). Antecedents of Ethnic Diversity: The Role of Nomination Committees. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S1), 103-119.
• 48.Planko, J., Cramer, J., Hekkert, M. P. and Chappin, M. M., (2017). Combining the technological innovation systems framework with the entrepreneurs’ perspective on innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(6), 614-625.
• 49.Prohorovs, A., Bistrova, J. and Ten, D., (2019). Start-up Success Factors in the Capital Attraction Stage: Founders’ Perspective. Journal of East-West Business, 25(1), 26-51.
• 50.Rosenberg, N., Frischtak, C., (1985). International technology transfer: concepts, measures, and comparisons. New York (USA) Praeger.
• 51.Rudyanto, A., Pirzada, K., (2020). The role of sustainability reporting in shareholder perception of tax avoidance.Social Responsibility Journal.
• 52.Saunila, M., (2017). Innovation capability in achieving higher performance: perspectives of management and employees. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(8), 903-916.
• 53.Seo, Y. W., Lee, Y. H., (2019). Effects of internal and external factors on business performance of start-ups in South Korea: The engine of new market dynamics. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11, 1847979018824231.
• 54.Suryani, A., Pirzada, K., (2018). Analysis of opportunistic behavior of management to company performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18.
• 55.Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., (1987). Environmental variation, strategic change and firm performance: A study of railroad deregulation. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 363-376.
• 56.Souitaris, V., (2002). Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research policy, 31(6), 877-898.
• 57.Wu, L. Y., Wang, C. J., Chen, C. P. and Pan, L. Y., (2008). Internal resources, external network, and competitiveness during the growth stage: A study of Taiwanese high-tech ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 32(3), 529-549.
• 58.Yam, R. C., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F. and Tang, E. P., (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research policy, 33(8), 1123-1140.
• 59.Yoon, J. H., (2018). A Study on the Influence of Business Performance on Customer Orientation and Technology Capability of SMEs and Venture Business in Electric Power. (Doctoral dissertation), Konkuk University,
• 60.Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P., (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic management journal, 23(5), 377-398.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).