Influence of sodium hyaluronate on dehydration and water distribution in soft contact lenses

• Autorzy: Rajchel D. , Krysztofiak K. , Szyczewski A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/oa160314

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of sodium hyaluronate (HA) solution on contact lens dehydration and the distribution of water in lens materials. These parameters were measured with gravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry. Five commercial soft contact lenses were used. They represented four FDA (Federal Drug Administration) groups: Air Optix Night&Day Aqua and Acuvue Oasys (I FDA group), Proclear 1-Day (II FDA group), PureVision (III FDA group) and 1-Day Acuvue Moist (IV FDA group). All materials were investigated with two preservative-free HA solutions 0.1% and 0.3%. HA solutions influenced the water content and the dehydration rate of some examined lenses. For three lenses (Oasys, Proclear, Moist) water content of HA lenses was greater than control. Significant slowdown of dehydration rate under HA during the first 20min was observed only for Proclear. PhaseI of dehydration increased significantly with HA solutions in case of Moist and Proclear. For Night&Day and Oasys phaseI appeared under HA solution while it was not present for control lenses. Duration of the phaseI was strongly correlated with water content of the lenses (R₂=0.844). The amount of freezable and non-freezable water depended strongly on characteristics of lens material and its interaction with HA molecules. Proclear seems to be the most prone to attach HA molecules which affect changes in dehydration characteristics and water behavior in the polymer. PureVision might be considered as the most resistant to HA in terms of dehydration dynamics and water distribution. All measured parameters seem to be dependent more on material properties than HA concentration.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

contact lens dehydration; sodium hyaluronate; gravimetry; differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Optica Applicata
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 46, nr 3
• Strony: 483--496
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rajchel D.

• Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

Krysztofiak K.

• Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

Szyczewski A.

• Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1]NICHOLS J.J., ZIEGLER C., MITCHELL G.L., NICHOLS K.K., Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46(6), 2005, pp. 1911–1914.
• [2]GUILLON M., MAISSA C., Dry eye symptomatology of soft contact lens wearers and nonwearers, Optometry and Vision Science 82(9), 2005, pp. 829–834.
• [3]CHALMERS R.L., BEGLEY C.G., Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 29(1), 2006, pp. 25–30.
• [4]NICHOLS J.J., SINNOTT L.T., Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 47(4), 2006, pp. 1319–1328.
• [5]MANN A., TIGHE B., Contact lens interactions with the tear film, Experimental Eye Research 117, 2013, pp. 88–98.
• [6]GONZÁLEZ-MÉIJOME J.M., LÓPEZ-ALEMANY A., ALMEIDA J.B., PARAFITA M.A., REFOJO M.F., Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the in vitro dehydration process of hydrogel contact lenses, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 83(2), 2007, pp. 512–526.
• [7]EFRON N., MORGAN P.B., Hydrogel contact lens dehydration and oxygen transmissibility, CLAO J 25(3), 1999, pp. 148–151.
• [8]PRITCHARD N., FONN D., Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 15(4), 1995, pp. 281–286.
• [9]TRANOUDIS I., EFRON N., Water properties of soft contact lens materials, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 27(4), 2004, pp. 193–208.
• [10]LITTLE S.A., BRUCE A.S., Environmental influences on hydrogel lens dehydration and the postlens tear film, International Contact Lens Clinic 22(7–8), 1995, pp. 148–155.
• [11]RAMAMOORTHY P., SINNOTT L.T., NICHOLS J.J., Contact lens material characteristics associated with hydrogel lens dehydration, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 30(2), 2010, pp. 160–166.
• [12]FONN D., Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable, Optometry and Vision Science 84(4), 2007, pp. 279–285.
• [13]CALONGE M., The treatment of dry eye, Survey of Ophthalmology 45, Supplement 2, 2001, pp. S227–S239.
• [14]STAHL U., WILLCOX M., STAPLETON F., Role of hypo-osmotic saline drops in ocular comfort during contact lens wear, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 33(2), 2010, pp. 68–75.
• [15]LAPČÍK L., DE SMEDT S., DEMEESTER J., CHABREČEK P., Hyaluronan: preparation, structure, properties, and applications, Chemical Reviews 98(8), 1998, pp. 2663–2684.
• [16]NASHIDA T., NAKAMURA M., MISHIMA H., OTORI T., Hyaluronan stimulates corneal epithelial migration, Experimental Eye Research 53(6), 1991, pp. 753–758.
• [17]RAH M.J., A review of hyaluronan and its ophthalmic applications, Optometry – Journal of the American Optometric Association 82(1), 2011, pp. 38–43.
• [18]ARAGONA P., DI STEFANO G., FERRERI F., SPINELLA R., STILO A., Sodium hyaluronate eye drops of different osmolarity for the treatment of dry eye in Sjögren’s syndrome patients, British Journal of Ophthalmology 86(8), 2002, pp. 879–884.
• [19]BRJESKY V., MAYCHUK YU., PETRAYEVSKY A., NAGORSKY P., Use of preservative-free hyaluronic acid (Hylabak®) for a range of patients with dry eye syndrome: experience in Russia, Clinical Ophthalmology 8, 2014, pp. 1169–1177.
• [20]MENGHER L.S., PANDHER K.S., BRON A.J., DAVEY C.C. , Effect of sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) on break-up time (NIBUT) in patients with dry eyes, British Journal of Ophthalmology 70(6), 1986, pp. 442–447.
• [21]VAN BEEK M, JONES L, SHEARDOWN H., Hyaluronic acid containing hydrogels for the reduction of protein adsorption, Biomaterials 29(7), 2008, pp. 780–789.
• [22]VAN BEEK M., WEEKS A., JONES L., SHEARDOWN H., Immobilized hyaluronic acid containing model silicone hydrogels reduce protein adsorption, Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 19(11), 2008, pp. 1425–1436.
• [23]WEEKS A., SUBBARAMAN L.N., JONES L., SHEARDOWN H., The competing effects of hyaluronic and methacrylic acid in model contact lenses, Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 23(8), 2012, pp. 1021–1038.
• [24]GOLDING T.R., EFRON N., BRENNAN N.A., Soft lens lubricants and prelens tear film stability, Optometry and Vision Science 67(6), 1990, pp. 461–465.
• [25]YOUNG G., Why one million contact lens wearers dropped out, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 27(2), 2004, pp. 83–85.
• [26]RUMPAKIS J., New data on contact lens dropouts: an international perspective, Review of Optometry 15, 2010, pp. 15–18.
• [27]MORGAN P.B., EFRON N., MORGAN S., LITTLE S., Hydrogel contact lens dehydration in controlled environmental conditions, Eye and Contact Lens 30(2), 2004, pp. 99–102.
• [28]KRYSZTOFIAK K., SZYCZEWSKI A., Study of dehydration and water states in new and worn soft contact lens materials, Optica Applicata 44(2), 2014, pp. 237–250.
• [29]QUESNEL N.M., GIASSON C.J., On-eye dehydration of proclear, resolution 55G and acuvue contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 24(3), 2001, pp. 88–93.
• [30]SCHEUER C.A., FRIDMAN K.M., BARNIAK V.L., BURKE S.E., VENKATESH S., Retention of conditioning agent hyaluronan on hydrogel contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 33, Supplement 1, 2010, pp. S2–S6.
• [31]GONZÁLEZ-MÉIJOME J.M., DA SILVA A.C., NEVES H., LOPES-FERREIRA D., QUEIRÓS A., JORGE J., Clinical performance and “ex vivo” dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses with two new multipurpose solutions, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 36(2), 2013, pp. 86–92.
• [32]YONG-HONG LIAO, JONES S.A., FORBES B., MARTIN G.P., BROWN M.B., Hyaluronan: pharmaceutical characterization and drug delivery, Drug Delivery 12(6), 2005, pp. 327–342.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.