An incentives model based on reputation for P2P systems

• Autorzy: Asís López-Fuentes de F.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper an incentive model to improve the collaboration in peer-to-peer networks is introduced. The proposed solution uses an incentives model associated with reputation issues as a way to improve the performance of a P2P system. The reputation of the all peers in the system is based on their donated resources and on their behavior. Supplying peers use these rules as a way to assign its outgoing bandwidth to the requesting peers during a content distribution. Each peer can build its best paths by using a best-neighbor policy within its neighborhood. A peer can use its best paths to obtain best services related to content search or download. The obtained results show that proposed scheme insulates the misbehaving peers and reduces the free-riding so that the systems performance is maximized.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

content distribution; incentive model; reputation; peer-to-peer networks

• Wydawca: Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 92--101
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Asís López-Fuentes de F.

• Departamento de Tecnologías de Información, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, México City, México

Bibliografia

• [1] S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, and H. García-Molina, “The Eigen-Trust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks”, in Proc. 12th Int. World Wide Web Conf., Budapest, Hungary, 2003, pp. 640–651.
• [2] R.V.V. S.V. Prasad, V. Srinivas, V. V. Kumari, K.V. S.V.N. Raju, “An effective calculation of reputation in P2P networks”, J. Netw., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 332–342, 2009.
• [3] X. Su and S. K. Dhaliwal, “Incentives mechanisms in P2P media streaming systems”, IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 74–81, 2010.
• [4] M. Srivatsa, L. Xiong, and L. Liu, ”Trustguard: countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks”, in Proc. 14th Int. World Wide Web Conf., Chiba, Japan, 2005, pp. 422–431.
• [5] M. Gupta, P. Judge, and M. Ammar, “A reputation system for peertopeer networks”, in 13th ACM Int. Worksh. Netw. Operat. Syst. Supp. Dig. Audio Video NOSSDAV 2003, Monterey, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 144–152.
• [6] K. Aberer and Z. Despotovic, “Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system”, in Proc. 10th ACM Int. Conf. Inform. Knowl. Manag., Atlanta, USA, 2001, pp. 310–317.
• [7] S. Marti and H. Garcia-Molina, “Limited reputation sharing in P2P systems”, in Proc. 5th ACM Conf. Elec. Commer., New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 91–101.
• [8] T. Silverston, O. Fourmaux, and J. Crowcroft, “Towards an incentive mechanism for peer-to-peer multimedia live streaming systems”, in Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Conf. P2P Comput., Aachen, Germany, 2008, pp. 125–128.
• [9] A. Blanc, Y. K. Liu, and A. Vahdat, “Designing Incentives for peertopeer routing”, in Proc. 24th IEEE Int. Conf. Comp. Commun. INFOCOM 2005, Miami, USA, 2005, IEEE Press, New York, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 374–385.
• [10] F. A. López-Fuentes, “Video multicast in peer-to-peer networks”, PhD Thesis, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany, 2009.
• [11] Y. Wang, J. Ostermann, and Y.-Q. Zhang, Video Processing and Communications. Upper Saddle River, USA: Prentice Holl, 2002.
• [12] J. G. Apostolopoulos, W. T. Tan, and S. J. Wee, “Video Streaming: concepts, algorithms, and systems”, Tech. rep. HPL-2002-26, HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2002.
• [13] J. A. T. Kangasharju, “Internet content distribution”, PhD Thesis, University of Nice, France, 2002.
• [14] A. Passarella, “A survey on content-centric technologies for the current Internet: CDN and P2P solutions”, Comp. Commun., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2012.
• [15] S. Androutsellis-Theotokis, D. Spinellis, “A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies”, ACM Comp. Surv., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 335–371, 2004.
• [16] R. Schollmeier, “Signaling and networking in unstructured peer-topeer networks”, PhD Thesis, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany, 2005.
• [17] P. Maymounkov and D. Mazieres, “Kademlia: a peer-to-peer informationsystem based on the XOR metric”, in Proc. Int. Worksh. Peer-to-Peer Syst., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002, pp. 53–65.
• [18] B. Cohen, “Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent”, in Proc. 1st Worksh. Econom. Peer-to-Peer Syst., Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003.
• [19] X. Su and S. K. Dhaliwal, “Incentive mechanisms in P2P media streaming systems”, IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 74–81, 2010.
• [20] W. Gao and L. Huo, “Challenges on peer-to-peer live media streaming”, in Proc. Int. Worksh. Multim. Content Anal. Mining MCAM’07, Weihai, China, 2007, vol. 4577, pp. 37–41.
• [21] N. Magharei and R. Rejaie, “Understanding mesh based peer to peer streaming”, in Proc. 16th Int. Worksh. Netww Operat. Syst. Support Digit. Audio and Video NOSSDAV’06, Newport, RI, USA, 2006.
• [22] S. Maini, “A survey study on reputation-based trust management in p2p networks”, Tech. rep., Department of Computer Science, Kent State University, pp. 1–17, 2006.
• [23] Z. Zhang, S. Chen, and M. Yoon, “MARCH: a distributed incentive scheme for peer-to-peer networks”, in Proc. 26th IEEE Int. Conf. Comp. Commun. INFOCOM 2007, Anchorage, USA, 2007, pp. 1091–1099.
• [24] A. Habib and J. Chuang, “Incentive mechanism for peer-to-peer media streaming”, in Proc. 12th IEEE Int. Worksh. Qual. Serv., Montreal, Canada, 2004, pp. 171–180.
• [25] H. Zhao and X. Yang, X. Li, “An incentive mechanism to reinforce truthful reports in reputation systems”, J. Netw. Comp. Appl., vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 951–961, 2012.
• [26] A. Tangpong and G. Kesidis, “A simple reputation model for BitTorrent-like incentives”, in Proc. Int. Conf. Game Theory Netw. GameNets’09, Instanbul, Turkey, 2009, pp. 603–610.
• [27] B. Q. Zhao, J. C. S. Lui, and D.-M. Chiu, “A mathematical framework for analyzing adaptive incentive protocols in P2P networks”, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 367–380, 2012.
• [28] J. Chang, H. Wang, G. Yin, and Y. Tang, “ICRep: an incentive compatible reputation mechanism for P2P systems”, in Proc. Worksh. Informa. Secur. Appl. WISA 2007, Jeju Island, Korea, 2007, pp. 371–386.
• [29] A. Ramachandran, A. Das Sarma, and N. Feamster, “Bitstore: an incentive compatible solution for blocked downloads in Bittorrent”, in Proc. Worksh. Econom. Netw., Syst. Comput. NetEcon’07, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007.
• [30] F. A. López-Fuentes and E. Steinbach, “Architecture for Media streaming delivery over P2P networks”, in Advanced Distributed Systems, F. F. Ramos et al., Eds. LNCS, vol. 3563. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2005, pp. 72–82.
• [31] K. Lai, M. Feldman, I. Stoica, and J. Chuang, “Incentives for cooperation in peer-to-peer networks”, in Proc. Worksh. Economi. Peerto- Peer Syst., Berkeley, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 1–6.
• [32] M. Feldman, K. Lai, J. Chuang, and I. Stoica, “Robust incentive technique for peer-to-peer networks”, in Proc. 5th ACM Conf. Elec. Commer., New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 102–111.
• [33] A. Montresor and M. Jelasity, “Peersim: a scalable P2P simulator,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Peer-to-Peer Comput. P2P’09, Seattle, WA, USA, 2009, pp. 99–100.
• [34] PeerSim: “A Peer-to-Peer Simulator”, 10.2013 [Online]. Available: http://peersim.sourceforge.net/
• [35] S. Kaune et al., ”Unraveling BitTorrent’s file unavailability: measurements and analysis,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Peer-to-Peer Comput., Delft, Netherlands, 2010, pp. 1–9.