Spatial differentiation in the eu fund absorption in Poland – a regional outlook

• Autorzy: Spychała Marcin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.32

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to conduct an analysis of spatial differentiation of the EU fund absorption of the programming period of 2007-2013 as well as the period of 2014-2020 in its regional dimension, i.e. at the level of 380 districts in Poland. The article attempts to test a hypothesis according to which in Poland there exist significant spatial variations in using European funds. Design/methodology/approach: In order to specify the level of the socio-economic development of districts, the Hellwig method has been used, by means of which a synthetic measure of development has been construed. Moreover, the compilation has examined the correlation between the discrepancies between the socio-economic level in respective districts and the amount of the community funds used in specific regions. Findings: Based on the research conducted in this paper, one may conclude that the absorption of EU funds stemming from structural funds as well as the cohesion fund is highly spatially varied. In Poland, from the standpoint of districts, there are significant spatial discrepancies in the use of EU funds of the 2007-2013 as well as 2014-2020 financial perspective. Research limitations/implications: In the future, research can be extended to other countries. The research limitation may be, however, the availability of empirical data. Social implications: The results of the research may prove useful in the planning and redistribution of EU funds by central and local government in the new financial perspective 2021-2027 in Poland. Originality/value The article presents a new approach to research on the spatial differentiation of the absorption of EU funds using the Hellwig method and the relationship between the absorption of these funds and the change in the level of socio-economic development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

EU funds; spatial differentiation; socio-economic development; Poland; district

PL

fundusze unijne; zróżnicowanie przestrzenne; rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy; Polska; powiat

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 146
• Strony: 455--468
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Spychała Marcin

• Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań

Bibliografia

• 1. Grosse, T.G. (2004). Poland and the European Union new cohesion policy. Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs.
• 2. Hall, R. (2012). European Union Regional Policy Aims, Methods, Results and...Reform. Brussels: European Commission.
• 3. Iyer, S., Kitson, M., and Toh, B. (2005). Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies, 8, 1015-1040.
• 4. Kehagia, A. (2013). The Impact of the EU’s Structural and Cohesion Funds. Jean Monnet Papers on Political Economy, 6, 2-26.
• 5. Kološta, S. (2016). Učiaci sa región – východiská, podstata, kritika, využitie. Banská Bystrica: Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici.
• 6. Korneluk, Ł. (2015). Rola środków z budżetu Unii Europejskiej w rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczym Polski w latach 2007-2013. Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie.
• 7. Kozarova, I. (2013). The impact of driving forces of globalization on the nature of border effects in Slovakia. In: L. Krticka (Ed.), Political factors of economic growth and development in transition economies (pp. 78-89). Ostrava: University of Ostrava.
• 8. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499.
• 9. Mrak, M., Richter, S., and Szemler, T. (2015). Cohesion Policy as a Function of the EU Budget. A Perspective from CEE Member States. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
• 10. Spychała, M. (2017). Zróżnicowanie przestrzenne absorpcji funduszy unijnych perspektywy finansowej 2007-2013 a zmiany poziomu wzrostu gospodarczego województw w Polsce. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 49(1), 348-358. doi: 10.15584/nsawg.2017.1.26.
• 11. Spychała, M. (2018). Poziom rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego powiatów w Polsce. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego (AE) we Wrocławiu, 527, 242-254. doi: 10.15611/pn.2018.527.21.
• 12. Sweet, D. (2012). EU Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Brussels: European Commission.
• 13. The Ministry of Development (2019a). Lista beneficjentów Funduszy Europejskich – stan na 31 lipca 2019 r., https://www.funduszeeuropejskie.2007-2013.gov.pl/NaborWnioskow/ listabeneficjentow/Strony/Lista_beneficjentow_FE_31072019.aspx, 08.08.2019.
• 14. The Ministry of Development (2019b). Lista projektów realizowanych z Funduszy Europejskich w Polsce w latach 2014-2020 – stan na 31 lipca 2019 r., https://www.funduszeeuropejskie.gov.pl/strony/o-funduszach/projekty/lista-projektow/ lista-projektow-realizowanych-z-funduszy-europejskich-w-polsce-w-latach-2014-2020/, 08.08.2019.
• 15. The Ministry of Infrastructure and Development (2014). Programming of the 2014-2020 financial perspective – Partnership Agreement. Warsaw: Ministry of Infrastructure and Development.
• 16. The Ministry of Regional Development (2007). National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013 in suport of growth and jobs (National Cohesion Strategy). Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.
• 17. Tkaczyński, J.W., and Świstak, M. (2013). Encyklopedia polityki regionalnej i funduszy europejskich, Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).