Research processes and methodological triangulation

• Autorzy: Dźwigoł Henryk , Dźwigoł-Barosz Mariola

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the article was to verify whether methodological triangulation supports research processes in management science. Design/methodology/approach: In order to verify the hypothesis, quantitative research (survey questionnaire) and qualitative research (interview questionnaire) were conducted. Quantitative research was addressed to a group of management science theoreticians being a target group. As a result of the research effort undertaken, 401 representatives of management science theoreticians were examined. Findings: The statistical conclusions of the research conducted among management scientists clearly show that a significant proportion (66%) believes that methodological triangulation is a necessary condition in the research process. Moreover, as many as 82% of the above mentioned respondents claim that triangulation supports the research process. Originality/value: It is necessary to use a variety of testing methods that provide a comprehensive response to the posed research problem.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

research process; methods; research techniques; methodological triangulation

PL

proces badawczy; metody; techniki badawcze; triangulacja metodologiczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 148
• Strony: 161--170
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dźwigoł Henryk

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Organisation and Management, Zabrze

autor

Dźwigoł-Barosz Mariola

• Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Organisation and Management, Zabrze

Bibliografia

• 1. Almalki, S. (2016). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research—Challenges and Benefits. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), doi:10.5539/jel.v5n3p288.
• 2. Apuke, O.D. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods: A Synopsis Approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(10), DOI: 10.12816/0040336.
• 3. Boddy, C. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19(4), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053.
• 4. Bryman, A. (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 3-37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
• 5. Dźwigoł, H. (2018). Współczesne procesy badawcze w naukach o zarządzaniu. Uwarunkowania metodyczne i metodologiczne. Warszawa: PWN.
• 6. Dzwigol, H., Aleinikova, O., Umanska, Y., Shmygol, N., & Pushak, Y. (2019). An Entrepreneurship Model for Assessing the Investment Attractiveness of Regions. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(SI1), 1-7.
• 7. Dźwigoł, H., Dźwigoł-Barosz, M., Zhyvko, Z., Miśkiewicz, R., Pushak, H. (2019) Evaluation of the energy security as a component of national security of the country. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 307-317. http://doi.org/10.9770/ jssi.2019.8.3(2).
• 8. Ferran-Ferrer, N., Guallar, J., Abadal, E., and Server, A. (2017). Research methods and techniques in Spanish library and information science journals (2012-2014). Information Research, 22(1).
• 9. Hair, J.F., Page, M., and Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of Business Research Methods. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374.
• 10. Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., and de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498-501, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334.
• 11. Hessen, R., Bright, L.K., and Zucker A. (2019). Vindicating methodological triangulation. Synthese, 196(8), 3067-3081, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1294-7.
• 12. Jick, T.D. (1979) Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quartely, 24(4), 602-611, DOI: 10.2307/2392366.
• 13. Joslin, R., and Müller, R. (2016). Identifying interesting project phenomena using philosophical and methodological triangulation. International Journal of Project Management, 34(6), 1043-1056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.005.
• 14. Kostera, M. (2003) Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych. Warszawa: PWN.
• 15. Pająk, K. (2010) Rozwój lokalny jako kategoria ekonomiczna. In: A. Grzelak, K. Pająk (Eds.), Nowe trendy w metodologii nauk ekonomicznych (pp. 185-215). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
• 16. Park, J., and Park, M. (2016). Qualitative versus Quantitative Research Methods: Discovery or Justification? Journal of Marketing Thought, 3(1), 1-7.
• 17. Quinlan, Ch., Babin, B., Carr, J., and Griffin, M. (2019). Business Research Methods. South Western Cengage.
• 18. Stańczyk, S. (2016) Triangulacja – łączenie metod badawczych i urzetelnienie badań. In: W. Czakon (Ed.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer Business.
• 19. Thomas, G. (2017). How to Do Your Research Project: A Guide for Students. London: Sage.
• 20. Tonidandel, S., King, E.B., and Cortina, J. (2016). Big Data Methods: Leveraging Modern Data Analytic Techniques to Build Organizational Science. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 525-547, DOI: 10.1177/1094428116677299.
• 21. Vaivio, J., & Sirén, A. (2010) Insights into method triangulation and “paradigms” in interpretive management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 130-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.03.001.
• 22. Walliman, N. (2017). Research Methods: The Basics. London: Routledge.