Evaluation of the residual magnetic field measurement system for early identification of railway defects

• Autorzy: Rucki Mirosław , Gockiewicz Anna , Szumiata Tadeusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mms.2019.130568

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents research on the capability of the residual magnetic field (RMF) measurement system to be applied to the railway inspection for the early non-destructive detection of defects. The metal magnetic memory (MMM) phenomena are analysed using normal component H_y of self-magnetic flux leakage (SMFL), and its tangential component H_x, as well as their respective gradients. The measurement apparatus is described together with possible factors that may affect the results of measurement. The Type A uncertainty estimation and repeatability tests were performed. The results demonstrate that the system may be successfully applied to detection of head check flaws.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

residual magnetic field; measurement; rail inspection; uncertainty; repeatability

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 26, nr 4
• Strony: 687--696
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab., wzory

Twórcy

autor

Rucki Mirosław

• Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Faculty of Technical Engineering, Malczewskiego 29, 26-600 Radom, Poland

autor

Gockiewicz Anna

• Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Faculty of Technical Engineering, Malczewskiego 29, 26-600 Radom, Poland

autor

Szumiata Tadeusz

• Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Faculty of Technical Engineering, Malczewskiego 29, 26-600 Radom, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Magel, E., Mutton, P., Ekberg, A., Kapoor, A. (2016). Rolling contact fatigue, wear and broken rail derailments, Wear 366-367, 249-257.
• [2] Bojarczak, P. (2014). Detection of squat defects in railway. Welding Technology Review, 86(10), 12-16.
• [3] Lesiak, P., Wlazło, M. (2014). Detection of head checking flaws in railway rails using an optical method. Scientific works of the Warsaw University of Technology, 104, 33-42.
• [4] Lesiak, P., Szumiata, T., Wlazło, M. (2015). Laser scatterometry for detection of squat defects in railway rails. The Archives of Transport, 33(1), 47-56.
• [5] Tang, Ch., Tian, G. Y., Chen, X., Wu, J., Li, K., Meng, H. (2017). Infrared and visible images registration with adaptable local-global feature integration for rail inspection. Infrared Physics & Technology, 87, 31-39.
• [6] Bojarczak, P. (2013). Visual diagnostics of the rails. Radom: ITE - PIB Radom.
• [7] Hansen, J., Calvert, J. (2002). Eddy current testing. A solution to detecting rolling contact fatigue in rail? Proc. of 5th international conference and exhibition, London, UK, 3-4 July.
• [8] Meierhofer, R., Pohl, R. (2006). Head Check Measurement - a Fully-operational System on a Rail Grinder. Proc. of World Congress on Railway Research, Montreal, Canada, 2006.
• [9] Jessop, C., Ahlström, J., Hammar, L., Fæster, S., Danielsen, H. K. (2016). 3D characterization of rolling contact fatigue crack networks. Wear, 366-367, 392-400.
• [10] Popović, Z., Lazarević, L., Brajović, L., Vilotijević, M. (2015). The Importance of Rail Inspections in the Urban Area - Aspect of Head Checking Rail Defects. Procedia Engineering, 117, 596-608.
• [11] Roskosz, M., Fryczkowski, K. (2015). Analysis of the possibility of identification of stress state based on residual magnetic field of ferromagnetic material. Welding Technology Review, 87(12), 75-77.
• [12] Bao, Sh., Fu, M., Lou, H., Bai, Sh. (2017). Defect identification in ferromagnetic steel based on residual magnetic field measurements. J. Magnetism Magn. Mater., 441(1), 590-597.
• [13] Yao, K., Shen, K., Wang, Zh. D., Wang, Y. Sh. (2014). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of residual magnetic field for ferromagnets under early damage. J. Magnetism Magn. Mater., 354(1), 112-118.
• [14] Wilson, J. W., Tian, G. Y., Barrans, S. (2007). Residual magnetic field sensing for stress measurement. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 135(2), 381-387.
• [15] Gontarz, Sz., Szulim, P., Lei, Y. (2018). Identification of magnetomechanical phenomena in a degradation process of loaded steel elements. J. Magnetism Magn. Mater., 467(1), 29-36.
• [16] Wang, Z. D., Yao, K., Deng, B., Ding, K. Q. (2010). Quantitative study of metal magnetic memory signal versus local stress concentration. NDT & E International, 43(6), 513-518.
• [17] Dubov, A. (2006). Principle features of metal magnetic memory method and inspection tools as compared to known magnetic NDT methods. CINDE Journal, 27(3), 16-20.
• [18] Zhu, B., Lo C.C.H., Lee, S. J., Jiles, D. C. (2001). Micromagnetic modeling of the effects of stress on magnetic properties. J. Appl. Phys., 89, 7009-7011.
• [19] Jiles, D. C., Devine, M. K. (1994). Recent developments in modeling of the stress derivative of magnetization in ferromagnetic materials. J. Appl. Phys., 76(10), 7015-7017.
• [20] Szewczyk, R., (2016). Stress-induced anisotropy and stress dependence of saturation magnetostriction in the Jiles-Atherton-Sablik model of the magnetoelastic Villari effect. Arch. Metall. Mater., 61, 607-612.
• [21] Siemko, A., Lachowicz, H. K. (1990). On the origin of stress-dependent saturation magnetostriction in metallic glasses. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 89, 21-25.
• [22] Szewczyk, R. (2016). Stress-induced anisotropy and stress dependence of saturation magnetostriction in the Jiles-Atherton-Sablik model of the magnetoelastic Villari effect. Arch. Metall. Mater., 61(2), 607-612.
• [23] Dubov, A. A., Dubov, A. A., Kolokolnikov, S. M. (2012). Metal Magnetic Memory method and control devices. Moscow: Spectrum.
• [24] Piotrowski, L., Augustyniak, B., Chmielewski M., Hristoforou, E. V., Kosmas, K. (2010). Evaluation of Barkhausen Noise and Magnetoacoustic Emission Signals Properties for Plastically Deformed Armco Iron. IEEE Trans. Magn., 46(2), 239-242.
• [25] Fiorillo, F., Küpferling M., Appin, C. (2018). Magnetic Hysteresis and Barkausen Noise in Plastically Deformed Steel. Metals, 8, 15.
• [26] JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
• [27] Dietrich, E., Schultze, A. (2011). Measurement Process Qualification: Gauge acceptance and measurement uncertainty according to current standards. München: Hanser.
• [28] Rucki, M., Barisic, B. (2009). Response Time of Air Gauges with Different Volumes of the Measuring Chambers. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 16(2), 289-298.
• [29] Joubert, J. W., Meintjes, S. (2015). Repeatability & reproducibility: Implications of using GPS data for freight activity chains. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 76, 81-92.
• [30] Cepova, L., Kovacikova, A., Cep, R., Klaput, P., Mizer, O. (2018). Measurement System Analyses - Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Methods. Meas. Sci. Rev., 18(1), 20-27

Uwagi

EN

This work was supported by the University of Technology and Humanities in Radom under statutory grant 3179/25/P-DBUPB/2015/063.