Habitat preferences of some neophytes with a reference to habitat disturbances

• Autorzy: Myśliwy M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The spread of species far from their native range is an important component of global changes. Investigating the ability of alien plants to invade different habitats is one of the most important approaches in the analysis of biological invasion mechanisms. The study was based on floristic research carried out in 1998–2002 in the north-western part of Poland. The habitats sampled were classified according to the EUNIS classification. A dataset of 2638 naturalized neophyte records was compiled based on a total of 2132 floristic lists. Species entries were supplemented with data on taxonomic position (family), origin, frequency, life form and number of habitats a particular species colonises. Ordination analyses showed the level of disturbance in individual habitats to be important in species-habitats relationships. Some of the species (e.g. Chamomilla suaveolens, Galinsoga parviflora, Veronica persica) occurred mainly in man-made, heavily disturbed habitats, while others (e.g. Impatiens parviflora, Padus serotina, Quercus rubra) were present primarily in natural habitats, less affected by humans. The species with the broadest habitat ranges identified included, i.a. Conyza canadensis, Impatiens parviflora, Epilobium ciliatum, and Oxalis fontana. Most of them, however, had different “core” habitats. Some species, e.g. Juncus tenuis, Elodea canadensis, Veronica persica were associated with one or a few habitats. The ability of species to invade numerous habitat types did not depend on their invasive status. The most successful aliens are those which spread dynamically along forest paths as well as those penetrating forest communities. The phytocoenotic role of each naturalized neophyte in plant communities requires a detailed study.Each individual habitat supports well-established alien species whose traits fit its characteristics and the disturbance intensity. Analysis of alien species traits, local distribution, habitat preferences and range makes it possible to reliably assess potentially successful invaders.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

alien plants; biological invasions; CANOCO; Central Europe; EUNIS; habitat types; ordination; species traits

PL

rośliny obce; inwazja biologiczna; Europa Środkowa; rodzaj; siedlisko; systematyka; cechy gatunków

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 62, nr 3
• Strony: 509--526
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Myśliwy M.

• University of Szczecin, Faculty of Biology, Department of Plant Taxonomy and Phytogeography, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Arianoutsou M., Bazos I., Delipetrou P., Kokkoris Y. 2010 – The alien flora of Greece: taxonomy, life traits and habitat preferences - Biol. Invasions, 12: 3525–3549.
• 2. Botta-Dukát Z. 2008 – Invasion of alien species to Hungarian (semi-)natural habitats – Acta Bot. Hung. 50 (Suppl.): 219-227.
• 3. Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Tichý L., Knollová I., Danihelka J. 2005 – Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats – Preslia, 77: 339–354.
• 4. Chytrý M., Maskell L.C., Pino J., Pyšek P., Vilà M., Font X., Smart S.M. 2008 - Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe – J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 448–458.
• 5. Dajdok Z., Anioł-Kwiatkowska J., Kącki Z. 1998 – Impatiens glandulifera Royle in the floodplain vegetation of the Odra River (West Poland) (In: Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, Eds: U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik, M. Williamson) - Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 161–168.
• 6. Davies C.E., Moss D., Hill M.O. 2004 – EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004 – European Environment Agency, European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, Paris.
• 7. Davis M.A., Grime J.P., Thompson K. 2000 – Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility – J. of Ecology, 88: 528–534.
• 8. Essl F., Milasowszky N., Dirnböck T. 2011 – Plant invasions in temperate forests: resistance or ephemeral phenomenon? – Basic Appl. Ecol. 12: 1–9.
• 9. Faliński J.B. 1998 – Invasive alien plants and vegetation dynamics (In: Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, Eds: U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik, M. Williamson) - Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 3–21.
• 10. Forman R.T.T., Alexander L.E. 1998 – Roads and their major ecological effects – Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 29: 207–231.
• 11. Godefroid S., Koedam N. 2004 – The impact of forest paths upon adjacent vegetation: effects of the path surfacing material on the species composition and soil compaction – Biol. Conserv. 119: 405–419.
• 12. Hejda M., Pyšek P., Pergl J., Sádlo J., Chytr ý M., Jarošík V. 2009 – Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18: 372–382.
• 13. Hierro J., Maron J.L., Callaway R.M. 2005 – A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range – J. Ecol. 93: 5–15.
• 14. Holub J., Jirásek V. 1967 – Zur Vereinheitlichung der Terminologie in der Phytogeographie - Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 2: 69–113.
• 15. Jauni M., Hyvönen T. 2010 – Invasion level of alien plants in semi-natural agricultural habitats in boreal region – Agric. Ecosys. Envir. 138: 109–115.
• 16. Jongman R.H.G., ter Braak C.J.F., van Tongeren D.F.R. (Eds) 1987 – Data analysis in community and landscape ecology – Pudoc, Wageningen.
• 17. Kondracki J. 2000 – Geografia regionalna Polski [Regional geography of Poland] – Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).
• 18. Kornaś J. 1968 – Geograficzno-historyczna klasyfikacja roślin synantropijnych [Geographical-historical classification of synanthropic plants] (In: Synantropizacja szaty roślinnej, I Neofityzm i apofityzm w szacie roślinnej Polski [Synanthropization of plant cover, I Neophytizm and apophytizm in plant cover of Poland] Ed: J.B. Faliński) – Materiały Zakładu Fitosocjologii Stosowanej UW 25: 33–41, Warszawa-Białowieża (in Polish).
• 19. Koźmiński C., Michalska B. (Eds) 2001 - Atlas of climatic risk to crop cultivation in Poland – Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Szczecin.
• 20. Křivánek M., Pyšek P., Jarošík V. 2006 - Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region – Conserv. Biol. 20: 1487–1498.
• 21. Lambdon P.W., Pyšek P., Basnou C., Hejda M., Arianoutsou M., Essl F., Jarošik V., Pergl J., Winter M., Anastasiu P., Andriopoulos P., Bazos I., Brundu G., Celesti-Grapow L., Chassot P., Delipetrou P., Josefsson M., Kark S., Klotz S., Kokkoris Y., Kühn I., Marchante H., Perglová I., Pino J., Vilà M., Zikos A., Roy D., Hulme P.E. 2008 – Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs – Preslia, 80: 101–149.
• 22. Lonsdale W.M. 1999 – Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility – Ecology, 80: 1522–1536.
• 23. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa A., Zając A., Zając M. 2002 – Flowering Plants and Pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow.
• 24. Myśliwy M. 2003 – Flora roślin naczyniowych Barlinecko-Gorzowskiego Parku Krajobrazowego w warunkach antropogenicznych przemian środowiska przyrodniczego [The flora of vascular plants of Barlinek-Gorzów Landscape Park in terms of anthropogenic changes of environment] – University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland, PhD thesis (in Polish).
• 25. Myśliwy M. 2008a – Archaeophytes in vascular flora of Barlinek-Gorzów Landscape Park (NW Poland): distribution, habitat preferences, threats – Natura Montenegrina, 7: 217–230.
• 26. Myśliwy M. 2008b – Vascular plants of forest dividing-lines, analyzed in respect of forest complex synanthropisation – Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 9–10: 63–71.
• 27. Myśliwy M. 2009 – Anthropogenic transformations of vascular plant flora in woodlands in the central part of the Barlinek Forest (Western Pomerania) (In: The role of geobotany in biodiversity conservation, Eds: J. Holeksa, B. Babczyńska-Sendek, S. Wika) – University of Silesia, Katowice, pp. 213–218.
• 28. Pyšek P., Pyšek A. 1995 – Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic – J. Veget. Sci. 6: 711–718.
• 29. Pyšek P., Prach K., Mandák B. 1998 – Invasions of alien plants into habitats of Central European landscape: an historical pattern (In: Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, Eds: U. Starfinger, K. Edwards, I. Kowarik, M. Williamson) – Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 23–32.
• 30. Pyšek P., Richardson D.M., Rejmánek M., Webster G.L., Williamson M., Kirschner J. 2004 – Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists – Taxon, 53: 131–143.
• 31. Pyšek P., Jarošík V., Chytrý M., Kropáč Z., Tichý L., Wild J. 2005 – Alien plants in temperate weed communities: prehistoric and recent occupy different habitats – Ecology, 86: 772–785.
• 32. Pyšek P., Křivánek M., Jarošík V. 2009 - Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species – Ecology, 90 (10): 2734–2744.
• 33. Richardson D.M. 1998 – Forestry trees as invasive aliens – Conserv. Biol. 12: 18–26.
• 34. Richardson D.M., Pyšek P. 2006 – Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility – Progress in Physical Geography, 30: 409–431.
• 35. Rejmánek M. 1989 – Invasibility of plant communities (In: Biological invasions: a global perspective, Eds: J.A. Drake, H.A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M. Rejmánek, M. Williamson) – John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 369–388.
• 36. Sádlo J., Chytrý M., Pyšek P. 2007 – Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic – Preslia, 79: 303–321.
• 37. Šerá B. 2010 – Road-side herbaceous vegetation: life history groups and habitat preferences – Pol. J. Ecol. 58: 59–69.
• 38. Šilc U., Vrbničanin S., Božić D., Čarni A., Dajić-Stevanović Z. 2012 – Alien plant species and factors of invasiveness of anthropogenic vegetation in the Northwestern Balkans – a phytosociological approach – Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 7: 720–730.
• 39. Sîrbu C., Oprea A., Samuil C., Tănase C. 2012 – Neophyte invasion in Moldavia (Eastern Romania) in different habitat types – Folia Geobot. 47: 215–229.
• 40. Stępień E. 2009 – Kenophytes in the Cedynia Landscape Park (In: The role of geobotany in biodiversity conservation, Eds: J. Holeksa, B. Babczyńska-Sendek, S. Wika) –University of Silesia, Katowice, pp. 309–317.
• 41. ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P. 2002 – CANOCO Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) – Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, Ny, USA.
• 42. Thellung A. 1915 – Pflanzenwanderungen unter dem Einfluss des Menschen – Englers Botanik Jahrbucher 53 (3–5), 116: 37–68.
• 43. Tilman D. 2004 – Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101 (30): 10854–10861.
• 44. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2003 – Habitat preferences of some alien plants (kenophytes) occurring in Poland (In: Phytogeographical problems of synanthropic plants, Eds: A. Zając, M. Zając, B. Zemanek) – Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, pp. 75–83.
• 45. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005 – The establishment and spread of alien plant species (kenophytes) in the flora of Poland – Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.
• 46. Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W., Hołdyński C. 2012 – Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych [Alien plants in Poland with particular reference to invasive species] – Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa (in Polish, English summary).
• 47. Vilà M., Pino J., Font X. 2007 – Regional assessment of plant invasions across different habitat types – J. Veget. Sci. 18: 35–42.
• 48. Walter J., Essl F., English T., Kiehn M. 2005 – Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects (In: Biological Invasions – From Ecology to Control, Eds: W. Nentwig, S. Bacher, M.J.W. Cock, H. Dietz, A. Gigon, R. Wittenberg) – NeoBiota, 6: 13–25.
• 49. Zając A. 1978 – Atlas of Distribution of Vascular Plants in Poland (ATPOL) – Taxon, 27: 481–484.
• 50. Zając A., Zając M. (Eds) 2001 – Distribution atlas of vascular plants of Poland –Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Cracow.
• 51. Zając A., Zając M., Tokarska-Guzik B. 1998 – Kenophytes in the flora of Poland: list, status and origin (In: Synanthropization of plant cover in new Polish research, Eds: J.B. Faliński, W. Adamowski, B. Jackowiak) – Phytocoenosis 10 (N.S.), Suppl. Cartogr. Geobot. 9: 107–116.
• 52. Zarzycki K., Trzcińska-Tacik H., Różański W., Szeląg Z., Wołek J., Korzeniak U. 2002 – Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow.