PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Relevance of philosophical approach to values in social science to maritime research

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The origin of maritime research lies in a multi‐disciplinary approach. The philosophical grounding for academic research inherently shapes the methodological approach, data collection methods adopted, and analysis techniques deployed. Thus, there is a need for an insight into the philosophical underpinnings of maritime research for better understanding of research design in maritime context. The paper will examine social science and its grounding in philosophical concepts for qualitative research, and the relevance of philosophical approach to ‘values’ in social science, to maritime research by using qualitative methods. The aim is to apprise the novice maritime researchers ‐ in simplistic language, about the philosophical approach to values, as an alternative to complex descriptions of concepts available in philosophical articles and references.
Twórcy
autor
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Haugesund, Rogaland, Norway
Bibliografia
  • [1] A. D. Couper, ʺWhy Maritime Studies?,ʺ Maritime Studies and Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1‐2, 1973.
  • [2] M. Gannon, B. Taheri, and J. Azer, ʺContemporary Research Paradigms & Philosophies ʺ in The Contemporary Research Methodology in Hospitality and Tourism F. Okumus, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, and S. Jahani Eds.: Emerald Publishing, 2022, pp. 5‐19.
  • [3] R. Collins and M. Makowsky, The Discovery of Society 5th ed. New York: Mc‐Graw Hill Inc, 1993.
  • [4] J. D. Eller, Social Science and Historical Perspectives: Society, Science, and Ways of Knowing. New York: Routledge, 2017.
  • [5] A. Bhattacherjee, Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. . USF Tampa Library Open Access Collections at Scholar Commons, 2012.
  • [6] M. H. Salmon, ʺSocial Sciences: Historical and philosophical overview of methods and goals,ʺ History and Philosophy of Science and Technology vol. III, 2011.
  • [7] E. Durkheim, ʺThe Rules of Sociological Method,ʺ New York: The Free Press, 1982.
  • [8] C. Geertz, ʺThe Interpretation of Cultures,ʺ New York: Basic Books Inc., 1973.
  • [9] E.G Guba and Y.S Lincoln, ʺEffective Evaluation – Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass Publishers, 1981.
  • [10] H. C. Kelman, ʺThe Relevance of Social Research to Social Issues: Promises and Pitfalls,ʺ The Sociological Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 77‐89, 1968.
  • [11] T. Benton and I. Craib, Philosophy of Social Science ‐ The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
  • [12] P. Winch, The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1990.
  • [13] M. Natanson, ʺA study in philosophy and the social sciences,ʺ Social Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 158‐172,1958.
  • [14] D. W. Stuckart, ʺPhilosophical Guidelines for the Social Studies: Enhancing Intelligence with Digital Tools and Artifacts,ʺ in Academic Knowledge Construction and Multimodal Curriculum Development D. J. Loveless Ed. Hershey: IGI Global, 2014, pp. 53‐70.
  • [15] E. Montuschi, ʺScientific Objectivity,ʺ in Philosophy of social science: A new introduction N. Cartwright and E. Montuschi Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 123‐144.
  • [16] H. Douglas, ʺValues in Social Science,ʺ in Philosophy of social science: A new introduction N. Cartwright and E. Montuschi Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 162‐182.
  • [17] E. M. Albert, ʺThe classification of values: A method and illustration. American Anthropologist,ʺ American Anthropologist, vol. 58, pp. 221‐248, 1956.
  • [18] M. Risjord, Philosophy of social science: A contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge, 2014.
  • [19] C. Bueger, ʺMaking Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy,ʺ International Political Sociology, vol. 9, pp. 1‐18, 2015.
  • [20] Y. Man, M. Lundh, and S. N. Mackinnon, ʺTowards a Pluralistic Epistemology: Understanding Human‐ Technology Interactions in Shipping from Psychological, Sociological and Ecological Perspectives,ʺ TransNav, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 795‐811, 2018.
  • [21] P. S. Gorski, ʺBeyond the Fact/Value Distinction: Ethical Naturalism and the Social Sciences.,ʺ Society, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 543‐553, 2013.
  • [22] F. G. Weber, ʺThe Fact‐Value Dichotomy: A New Light on an Old Problem.,ʺ. Sociology Mind, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 154‐170, 2017.
  • [23] H. Putnam, The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. London: Harvard University Press, 2002.
  • [24] J. T. Roberts, ʺIs Logical Empiricism committed to the ideal of value free science.,ʺ in Value free science: Ideals and illusions H. Kincaid, K. H. Dupre, and A. Wylie Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 143‐238.
  • [25] D. Hanson, J ʺValues and social science,ʺ Social Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 81‐87, 1969.
  • [26] H. Douglas, ʺRejecting the Ideal of Value‐Free Science,ʺ in Value free science: Ideals and illusions H. Kincaid, K. H. Dupre, and A. Wylie Eds. Oxford,: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 120‐142.
  • [27] A. N. Sharlin, ʺMax Weber and the origins of the idea of value free social science,ʺ European Journal of Sociology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 337‐353, 1974.
  • [28] M. Duffy and R. J. Chenail, ʺValues in Qualitative and Quantitative Research,ʺ Counseling and Values, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 22‐38, 2009.
  • [29] K. H. Rolin, ʺObjectivity, trust and social responsibility,ʺ Synthese vol. 199, pp. 513‐533, 2021.
  • [30] R. G. Dunn, Toward a Pragmatist Sociology: John Dewey and the Legacy of C. Wright Mills. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2018.
  • [31] M. F. Pinto and D. J. Hicks, ʺLegitimizing Values in Regulatory Science,ʺ Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 127, no. 3, 2019.
  • [32] C.‐S. Lu, C.‐N. Hsu, and C.‐H. Lee, ʺThe Impact of Seafarers’ Perceptions of National Culture and Leadership on Safety Attitude and Safety Behavior in Dry Bulk Shipping,ʺ International Journal of e‐Navigation and Maritime Economy, vol. 4, pp. 75‐87, 2016.
  • [33] Q. Wang, ʺA Study on the Cultivation of Values of Maritime College Students’ Occupational Pride,ʺ International Journal of Information and EducationTechnology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 433‐436, 2019.
  • [34] C. Liss, ʺThe Unique Challenges and Difficulties of Maritime Security Research,ʺ SAIS Review, vol. XXXIII, no. 2, 2013.
  • [35] R. T. B. Iversen, ʺThe Mental Health of Seafarers,ʺ International Maritime Health, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 78‐89, 2012.
  • [36] E. Anderson, ʺUses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce,ʺ Hypatia, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1‐24, 2004.
  • [37] I. Koskinen and K. Rolin, ʺDistinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research,ʺ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 91, pp. 191‐198, 2022.
  • [38] (2021). Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its 104th Session.
  • [39] United Nations. ʺOur values, beliefs and identity’ are embedded within language, UNESCO says on Mother Language Day.ʺ https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/02/1003191#:~:text=Our%20values%2C%20our%20beliefs%20and,our%20traditions%20and%20our%20knowledge. (accessed 2023).
  • [40] A. Phayal, A. Gold, and B. Prins, ʺInterstate hostility and maritime crime: Evidence from South East Asia,ʺ Marine Policy, vol. 143, 2022.
  • [41] A. Gold, A. Phayal, and B. Prins, ʺThe unexpected consequences of the COVID‐19 pandemic on maritime crime: Evidence from Indonesia and Nigeria,ʺ International Area Studies Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7‐ 23, 2023.
  • [42] P. Saviolakis and M. Pazarzis, ʺThe European Response To Open Ship Registries And Flags Of Convenience Through The Creation Of Offshore And International Ship Registries,ʺ Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0, no. 2, pp. 69‐81, 2021.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fcb5e37b-8e72-41e3-938c-630315cddfe6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.