The relationship between productivity and some drought tolerance indicators for several cultivars of bread wheat

• Autorzy: Barhom Lubna , Touchan Hayat

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2022.143733

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research was conducted in Tartous Governorate during the two agricultural seasons (2018-2019 and 2019-2020) under control conditions, the aim of the research is to study the relationship between the productivity of five promising strains of bread wheat (‘ACSAD 1256’, ‘Douma 58847’, ‘Douma 58585’, ‘Douma 64453’, ‘ACSAD 1149’) and two cultivars (‘Douma 2’ and ‘Douma 4’) and some quantitative indicators of drought: stress tolerance index (STI), mean of productivity (MP), modified stress tolerance index (MSTI), and relative yield (RY). Cultivation was carried out in pots filled with light sandy silty soil, and three treatments of 70, 50, and 30% of the field capacity were applied in addition to the control and with three replications for each treatment. The strains ‘Douma 58585’ and ‘Douma 58847’ gave high yield values for grain in the two agricultural seasons. It was also found that there were significant differences between the two seasons in yield between the control and drought stress factors and drought tolerance indicators, such as stress tolerance index, modified stress tolerance index (MSTI), mean of productivity (MP), and relative yield (RY). On the other hand, a positive and strong relationship was found between STI, MSTI, and MP in both treatments and both seasons. The research concluded that the best indicators, which were related to the productivity, whether in the control or transactions and in the two growing seasons together, are STI and MP, which are promising indicators in the classification of stress-tolerant cultivars or strains.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bread wheat; drought indicators; drought stress; grain yield

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Special Issue
• Strony: 171--175
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Barhom Lubna

• Tishreen University, Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, Lattakia, Syria

autor

Touchan Hayat

• Aleppo University, Faculty of Agriculture, Field Crops Department, 12212, Aleppo, Halab, Syria

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-4186

Bibliografia

• ALI K., KHALIL S.K., MUNSIF F., RAB A., NAWAB K., KHAN A.Z., KAMAL A., KHAN Z.H. 2012. Response of maize to various nitrogen sources and tillage practices. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. Vol. 28(1) p. 9–14.
• ANWAAR H.A., PERVEEN R., MANSHA M.Z., ABID M., SARWAR Z.M., AATIF H.M., ..., KHAN K.A. 2020. Assessment of grain yield indices in response to drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. Vol. 27(7) p. 1818–1823. DOI 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.009.
• ARISNABARRETA S., MIRALLES D. 2008. Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crop. Vol. 107(3) p. 196–202. DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.02.009.
• BAZRAFSHAN M., MATLOBI M., MESBAH M., JOUKAR K. 2009. Evaluation of drought tolerance of sugar beet strains and cultivars using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Sugar Beet. Vol. 24(2) p. 15–35. DOI 10.22092/JSB.2009.1043.
• BATES R.H. 2008. When things fell apart: State failure in late century Africa. (Cambridge studies in comparative politics). New York. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521887356 pp. 218.
• BENNANI S., NSARELLAH N., JLIBENE M., TADESSE W., BIROUK A., OUABBOU H. 2017. Efficiency of drought indices under different severities for bread wheat selection. Australian Journal of Crop Science. Vol. 11(4) p. 395–405. DOI 10.21475/ajcs.17.11.04.pne272.
• BLUM A. 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. Florida. CRC Press pp. 231. ISBN 9781351075718. DOI 10.1201/9781351075718.
• DADBAKHSH A., YAZDANSEPAS A., AHMADIZADEH M. 2011. Study drought stress on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by drought tolerance indices. Advances Environmental Biology. Vol. 5(8) p. 1804–1810.
• ERDEMCI I. 2018. Evaluation of drought tolerance selection indices using grain yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicea. Vol. 10(3) p. 439–446. DOI 10.15835/nsb10310291.
• FAROOQ M., HUSSAIN M., KADAMBOT H., SIDDIQUE M. 2014. Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. Vol. 33(4) p. 331–349. DOI 10.1080/07352689.2014.875291.
• FARSHADFER E., SUTKA J. 2003. Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines. Cereal Research Communications Hungary. Vol. 311 p. 33–40. DOI 10.1007/BF03543247.
• FERNANDEZ G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of Symposium. Taiwan, 13–16 Aug. Ch. 25 p. 257–270.
• FRAY K.J. 1981. Capabilities and limitations of conventional plant breeding. In: Genetic Engineering for Crop Improvement. Eds. K.O. Rachie, J.M. Lyman. A Rockefeller Foundation Conference. 12–15.05.1980 p. 15–62.
• GIORGI F. 2006. Climate change hot-spots. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol. 33(8), L08707 p. 1–4. DOI 10.1029/2006GL025734.
• GOLABADI M., ARZANI A., MIRMOHAMMADI S.A.M. 2006. Assessment of drought tolerance in segregating populations in durum wheat. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 1(5) p. 162–171.
• HALL A.E. 1993. Is dehydration tolerance relevant to strains and cultivars differences in leaf senescence and crop adaption to dry environments? In: Plant response to cellular dehydration during environmental stress. Eds. T.J. Close, E.A. Bray. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Riverside Symposium in Plant Physiology. 28–30.01.1993, Riverside, California. ASPP p. 1–10.
• HAWKESFORD M.J., ARAUS J.-L., PARK R., CALDERINI D., MIRALLES D., SHEN T., ZHANG J., PARRY M.A.J. 2013. Prospects of doubling global wheat yields. Food and Energy Security. Vol. 2(1) p. 34–48. DOI 10.1002/fes3.15.
• MAHASNA A. 2012. Evaluation of the performance of wheat cultivars to withstand water stress in Damascus city conditions. Damascus University Journal of Agricultural Sciences. Vol. 28, 2 p. 127–141.
• MALEKI A., BABAEI F.H., AMIN C., AHMADI J., DIZAJI A.A. 2008. The study of seed yield stability and drought tolerance indices of bread wheat strains and cultivars under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Research Journal of Biological Sciences. Vol. 3(8) p. 841–844.
• MAU Y., ANTONIUS S.S., SHIRLY S., OEMATAN S., JENNY E.R., MARKUS S. 2019. Drought tolerance indices for selection of drought tolerant, high yielding upland rice strains and cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science. Vol. 13(1) p. 170–178. DOI 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.01.p1778.
• MODHEJ A., NADERI A., SIADAT S.A. 2007. Effect of heat stress after anthesis on source limitation of wheat and barley cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol. 13 p. 393–403.
• NOORI S., LIAGHAT A.M., EBRAHIM K. 2012. Prediction of crop production using drought indices at different time scales and climatic factors to manage drought risk. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Vol. 48(1) p. 1–9. DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00586.x.
• ORT D. 2002. Chilling-induced limitations on photosynthesis in warm climate plants: Contrasting mechanisms. Environmental Control in Biology. Vol. 40(1) p. 7–18.
• PACHAURI R.K., REISINGER A. 2008. Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report. Geneva. IPCC ISBN 92-9169-122-4 pp. 104.
• RAWTIYA A.K., KAZALY G. 2021. Drought stress and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield: A review. The Pharma Innovation Journal. Vol. 10(5) p. 1007–1012.
• SHAHRYARI R., GURBANOV E., GADIMOV A., D. HASSANPANAH D. 2008. Tolerance of 42 bread wheat strains and cultivars to drought stress after anthesis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. Vol. 11(10) p. 1330–1335. DOI 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1330.1335.
• ZAMSKI E., GRUMBERGER Y. 1998. Short- and long-eared high-yielding hexaploid wheat cultivars: Which have to have the unexpressed potential for higher yield. Annals of Botany. Vol. 75(5) p. 501–506. DOI 10.1006/anbo.1995.1051.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).