Renewable Energy and Poverty in Sustainable Development of the European Union

Mlaskawa, Julita

doi:10.35784/pe.2022.2.12

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Renewable Energy and Poverty in Sustainable Development of the European Union

Autorzy

Mlaskawa Julita

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.2.12

Warianty tytułu

Odnawialne Źródła Energii i ubóstwo a zrównoważony rozwój Unii Europejskiej

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The current socioeconomic development results in a number of consequences that lead to changes in the environment. These changes are often harmful and are associated with over- or misuse of natural resources. The issue of sustainable development is increasingly taking a prominent place in regional and local development strategies. Access to energy services is essential for social inclusion. Addressing poverty, including energy poverty, can bring a number of benefits related to reduced health expenditures, reduced air pollution, improved comfort and well-being, and improved household budgets, among other things. According to the results of the analysis, the utilisation of energy from renewable sources is intrinsically linked with the salary level – on average, a higher salary level is accompanied by a larger scale of utilising energy from renewable sources. In spite of the expected negative value, a similar relationship has been observed in the case of correlating the level of poverty with the use of energy from renewable sources – it is higher when the use of energy from renewable sources is higher. The performed study indicates the lack of adequately constructed support mechanisms for the poor in terms of financing and operating installations generating green energy, as well as the lack of proper education as regards local and global benefits resulting from prosumer energy. The desire to eliminate the abovementioned barriers necessitates the continuation of actions concerning synergistic accomplishment of the first and seventh targets, constituting two out of seventeen foundations of sustainable development.

Słowa kluczowe

sustainable development renewable energy poverty energy poverty decarbonisation

rozwój zrównoważony energia odnawialna ubóstwo ubóstwo energetyczne dekarbonizacja

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 17, nr 2

Strony

110--123

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 60 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Mlaskawa Julita

jmlaskawa@wsb.edu.pl

WSB University, ul. Cieplaka 1C, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3655-8298

Bibliografia

1. ABRELL J., KOSCH M., RAUSCH S., 2019, Carbon abatement with renewables: Evaluating wind and solar subsidies in Germany and Spain, Journal of Public Economics, 169: 172-202, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.11.007.
2. ABRELL J., RAUSCH S., STREITBERGER C., 2019A, The economics of renewable energy suport, Journal of Public Economics, 176: 94-117, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.002.
3. AGYEKUM E.B., 2020, Energy poverty in energy rich Ghana: A SWOT analytical approach for the development of Ghana's renewable Energy, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 40, DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100760.
4. APERGIS E., APERGIS N., 2020, Can the COVID-19 pandemic and oil prices drive the US Partisan Conflict Index?, Energy Research Letters,1(1), DOI: 10.46557/001c.13144.
5. ARMEANU D.S., VINTILĂ G., GHERGHINA S.C., 2017, Does Renewable Energy Drive Sustainable Economic Growth? Multivariate Panel Data Evidence for EU-28 Countries, Energies, 10(3), 381, DOI: 10.3390/en10030381.
6. AYODELE R., OGUNJUYIGBE A.S.O., OPEBIYI A.A., 2018, Electrical energy poverty among micro-enterprises: Indices estimation approach for the city of Ibadan, Nigeria, Sustainable Cities and Society, 37: 344-357, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.007.
7. BARRON A.R., 2018, Time to refine key climate policy models, Nature Climate Change, 8(5): 350-352, DOI:10.1038/s41558-018-0132-y.
8. BOUZAROVSKI S., PETROVA S., 2015, A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty-fuel poverty binary, Energy Research and Social Science, 10: 31-40, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007.
9. BOUZAROVSKI S., PETROVA S., SARLAMANOV R., 2012, Energy poverty policies in the EU: A critical perspective, Energy Policy, 49: 76-82, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.033.
10. BURKE M., STEPHENS J., 2018, Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review, Energy Research & Social Science, 35: 78-93, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
11. BUZAR S., 2007, The 'hidden' geographies of energy poverty in post-socialism: Between institutions and households, Geoforum, 38(2): 224-240, DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.02.007.
12. CASTAÑO-ROSA R., SOLÍS-GUZMÁN J., RUBIO-BELLIDO C., MARRERO M., 2019, Towards a multiple-indicator approach to energy poverty in the European Union: A review, Energy and Buildings, 193: 36-48, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.039.
13. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2020/1563 of 14 October 2020 on energy poverty C/2020/9600, Official Journal of the European Union, L 357/35.
14. DIESENDORF N., ELLISTON B., 2018, The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: a response to critics, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93: 318-330, DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.042.
15. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, Official Journal of the European Union, 2018, L 328/82.
16. European Commission, Europe's moment: repair and prepare for the nextgeneration, Brussels, 2020a, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid¼1590732521013&uri¼COM:2020:456.FIN (17.08.2021).
17. European Commission, Launch of the EU Energy Poverty Observatory (EPOV), 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/events/launch-eu-energy-poverty-observatory-epov, (18.08.2021)
18. FRAGKOS P., FRAGKIADAKIS K., SOVACOOL B., PAROUSSOS L., VRONTISI Z., CHARALAMPIDIS I., 2021, Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union, Energy, 237, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121591.
19. FRANK A.G., GERSTLBERGER W., PASLAUSKI C.A., VISINTAINER-LERMAN L., AYALA N.F., 2018, The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems, Energy Policy, 115: 353-365, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.036.
20. FRIEDLINGSTEIN P., JONES M., O’SULLIVAN M., ANDREW R., HAUCK J., PETERS G., PETERS W., PONGRATZ J., SITCH S., LE QUÉRÉ C., et al., 2019, Global Carbon Budget 2019, Earth System Science Data, 11:1783-1838, DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019.
21. GALVIN R., HEALY N., 2020, The Green New Deal in the United States: what it is and how to pay for it, Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 101529, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101529.
22. GIELEN D., BOSHELL F., SAYGIN D., BAZILIAN M.D., WAGNER N., GORINI R., 2019, The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, Energy Strategy Reviews, 24: 38-50, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006.
23. GILLARD R., SNELL C., BEVAN M., 2017, Advancing an energy justice perspective of fuel poverty: Household vulnerability and domestic retrofit policy in the United Kingdom, Energy Research and Social Science, 29: 53-61, DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.012.
24. HÖLTL A., MACHARIS C., DE BRUCKER K., 2017, Pathways to Decarbonise the European Car Fleet: A Scenario Analysis; Using the Backcasting Approach, Energies, 11, 20, DOI: 10.3390/en11010020.
25. HYUN S., TAGHIZADEH-HESARY F., SHIM H. S., 2021, Modeling solar energy system demand using householdlevel data in Myanmar, Economic Analysis and Policy, 69: 629-639, DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.011.
26. JU L., TAN Z., LI H., TAN Q., YU X., SONG X., 2016, Multi-objective operation optimization and evaluation model for CCHP and renewable energy based hybrid energy system driven by distributed energy resources in China, Energy, 111:322–340, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.085.
27. KACZMARCZYK M., SOWIŻDŻAŁ A., TOMASZEWSKA B., 2020, Energetic and environmental aspects of individual heat generation for sustainable development at a local scale – A case study from Poland, Energies, 13(2), 454, DOI:10.3390/en13020454.
28. KAHOULI S., 2020, An economic approach to the study of the relationship between housing hazards and health: The case of residential fuel poverty in France, Energy Economics, 85, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104592.
29. KAWIORSKA D., WITOŃ A., 2016, Poverty and social exclusion in context ‘Europe 2020’strategy: progress in implementation, Economic and Political Thought, 2(53).
30. KHAN I., JEMAI J., HAN L., SARKAR B., 2020, Effect of electrical energy on the manufacturing setup cost reduction, transportation discounts, and process quality improvement in a two-echelon supply chain management under a servicelevel constraint, Energies, 12, 3733: DOI: 10.3390/en12193733.
31. KHUONG N.V., SHABBIR M.S., SIAL M.S., KHANH T.H.T., 2020, Does informal economy impede economic growth? Evidence from an emerging economy, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(2): 103-122, DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2020.1711501.
32. KYPRIANOU I., SERGHIDES D., 2020, Challenges in regional approaches: Lessons from energy poverty research in a small scale European member state, Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 410(1), DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012086.
33. Liu F., Zhang K., Zou R., 2019, Robust LFC Strategy for Wind Integrated Time-Delay Power System Using EID Compensation, Energies, 12(17): 3223, DOI: 10.3390/en12173223.
34. OLCZAK P., KRYZIA D., MATUSZEWSKA D., KUTA M., 2021, ’My Electricity’ Program Effectiveness Supporting the Development of PV Installation in Poland, Energies, 14, 231, DOI: 10.3390/en 14010231.
35. PACHAURI R.K., MEYERS L.A (eds.), 2014, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, IPCC, Geneva.
36. PANEK T. (ed.), 2007, Social Statistics, PWE, Warsaw.
37. PARAJULI R., 2011, Access to energy in Mid/Far west region-Nepal from the perspective of energy poverty, Renewable Energy, 36(9): 2299-2304, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.014.
38. PEDRONI P., 2004, Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econ. Theory, Published online by Cambridge University Press, 20: 597-625, DOI:10.1017/S0266466604203073.
39. PRIMC K., KALAR B., SLABE-ERKER R., DOMINKO M., OGOREVC M., 2020, Circular economy configuration indicators in organizational life cycle theory, Ecological Indicators, 116, DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106532.
40. Proposal for a REGULATION of the EUROPEANPARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law), European Commission, Brussels, 2020. 41. QIU H., YAN J., LEI Z., SUN D., 2018, Rising wages and energy consumption transition in rural China, Energy Policy, 119: 545-553, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.053.
42. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018, 2018a, Official Journal of the European Union, L 328/1.
43. ROBINSON C., BOUZAROVSKI S., LINDLEY S., 2018, Underrepresenting neighbourhood vulnerabilities? The measurement of fuel poverty in England, Environment and Planning A, 50(5): 1109-1127, DOI: 10.1177/0308518X18764121.
44. ROCKSTRÖM J., GAFFNEY O., ROGELJ J., MEINSHAUSEN M., NAKICENOVIC N., SCHELLNHUBER H. J., 2017, A roadmap for rapid decarbonization, Science, 355(6331): 1269-1271, DOI: 10.1126/science.aah3443.
45. SARKAR M., CHUNG B.D., 2021, Effect of Renewable Energy to Reduce Carbon Emissions under a Flexible Production System: A Step toward Sustainability, Energies, 14, 215, DOI: 10.3390/10.3390/en14010215.
46. SEBRI M., BEN-SALHA O., 2014, On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: Fresh evidence from BRICS countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 14-23, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.033.
47. SIKSNELYTE-BUTKIENE I., STREIMIKIENE D., LEKAVICIUS V., BALEZENTIS T., 2021, Energy poverty indicators: A systematic literature review and comprehensive analysis of integrity, Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102756.
48. SOKOŁOWSKI M. M., 2019, When black meets green: A review of the four pillars of India's energy policy, Energy Policy, 130: 60-68, DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.051.
49. SOKOŁOWSKI J., LEWANDOWSKI P., KIEŁCZEWSKA A., BOUZAROVSKI S., 2020, A multidimensional index to measure energy poverty: The polish case, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 15(2): 92-112, DOI:10.1080/15567249.2020.1742817.
50. SOVACOOL B.K., 2012, The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges, Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3): 272-282, DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.006.
51. The Future of Cooling, 2018, Paris, IEA.
52. THOMSON H., BOUZAROVSKI S., SNELL C., 2017, Rethinking the measurement of energy poverty in Europe: A critical analysis of indicators and data, Indoor and Built Environment, 26(7): 879-901, DOI: 10.1177/1420326X17699260.
53. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment (17.08.2021)
54. VENKATESH G., 2021, Sustainable Development Goals – Quo Vadis, Cities of the World?, Problemy Ekrozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(1): 171-179, DOI: 10.35784/pe.2021.1.18.
55. WALKER G., SIMCOCK N., DAY R., 2016, Necessary energy uses and a minimum standard of living in the united kingdom: Energy justice or escalating expectations?, Energy Research and Social Science, 18, 129-138, DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.007.
56. WANG H., ZHAO Q., BAI Y., et al., 2020, Poverty and Subjective Poverty in Rural China, Social Indicators Research, 150: 219-242, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02303-0.
57. WANG Z., BUI Q., ZHANG B., NAWARATHNA C.L.K., MOMBEUIL C., 2021, The nexus between renewable energy consumption and human development in BRICS countries: The moderating role of public debt, Renewable Energy, 165:381-390, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.144.
58. WEISS K., SAREVSKI S., 2019, Ikea’s New Plan to Rent Furniture Shows How the Market Can Protect the Environment, Foundation for Economic Education, fee.org.
59. ZAMFIR C., DUMITRU M., MIHĂILESCU A., STANCIU M., ZAMFIR E., BĂDESCU I., et al., 2015, Energetic poverty: The social impact of the energy prices reform on the standard of living, Sărăcia energetică: Impactul social al reformei preţurilor energiei asupra standardului de viaţă, Calitatea Vietii, 26(4): 313-342.
60. ZHU H., ZHU S.X., 2017, Corporate innovation and economic freedom: Cross-country comparisons, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 63: 50-65, DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.04.003.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-fc5d2f21-bbf6-49c4-ade0-602d43a424d1