Theoretical Predictions and Actual Hearing Threshold Levels in Workers Exposed to Ultrasonic Noise of Impulsive Character—A Pilot Study

• Autorzy: Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M. , Dudarewicz A. , Śliwińska-Kowalska M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Results of standard pure-tone audiom etry (PTA) were collected from 25 workers, mainly females, aged 23–58 years, exposed for 2–13 years to ultrasonic noise emitted by ultrasonic welders. Hearing tests were completed by evaluation of exposure to ultrasonic noise. The subjects’ actual audiometric hearing threshold levels (HTLs) were compared with theoretical predictions calculated according to ISO 1999:1990. In 60% of cases sound pressure levels in the 10–40 kHz 1/3-octave bands at workstands exceeded Polish exposure limits for ultrasonic noise. Our comparison of predicted and measured HTLs suggests that the ISO 1999:1990 method, intended for audible noise, might also make it possible to predict reliably permanent hearing loss (in the 2 000–6 000 Hz frequency range) after exposure to ultrasonic noise. No significant progress of hearing impairment (assessed using PTA) in the operators of ultrasonic welders was noted. Nevertheless, further studies on the hearing status of workers exposed to ultrasonic noise are needed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ultrasonic noise; noise measurements; pure-tone audiometry; hearing threshold levels

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 4
• Strony: 409–--418
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz, rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M.

• Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland

autor

Dudarewicz A.

• Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland

autor

Śliwińska-Kowalska M.

• Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.World Health Organization (WHO).Ultrasound. Environmental health criteria No. 22. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1982.
• 2.Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M, Koton J, Śliwińska-Kowalska M, Augustyńska D, Kameduła M. Ultrasonic noise. PiMOŚP. 2001;17(2);55–88. In Polish, with an abstract in English.
• 3.Mikulski W, Smagowska B. Ultrasonic noise at selected workplaces (paper No. 903). In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration [CD-ROM]. Vienna, Austria: Vienna University of Technology; 2006.
• 4.Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M, Dudarewicz A, Śliwińska-Kowalska M. Sources of occupational exposure to ultrasonic noise. Med Pr. 2007:58(2):105–16. In Polish.
• 5.Acton WI, Carson MB. Audiotory and subjective effects of airborne noise from industrial ultrasonic sources. Brit J Industr Med. 1967;24:297–304.
• 6.Parrack HO. Effects of airborne ultrasound. Int Aud. 1966:5:294–308.
• 7.Acton WI, Hill CR. Hazards of industrial ultrasound. Protection. 1977;14(19):12−7.
• 8.Lawton BW. Damage to human hearing by airborne sound of very high frequency or ultrasonic frequency (Contract research report 343/2001; Institute of Sound and Vibration research for the Health and Safety Executive). Retrieved September 4, 2007, from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/crr01343.pdf.
• 9.Ordinance issued by the Minister of Labour and Social Policy of November 29, 2002 on maximum admissible concentrations and maximum admissible intensities for agents harmful to human health in the work environment, with later amendments. Dz U. 2002;(217):item 1833 and Dz U. 2005;(212):item 1769. In Polish.
• 10.Grzesik J, Pluta E. High-frequency hearing risk of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1983;53:77−88.
• 11.Grzesik J, Pluta E. High-frequency noise induced hearing loss: a field study on the roll of intensity level and accumulated noise dose Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;57:77−88.
• 12.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment (Standard No. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1999.
• 13.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics—guidelines for the measurement and assessment of exposure to noise in the working environment (Standard No. ISO 9612:1997. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1997.
• 14.Śliwińska-Kowalska M, Dudarewicz A, Kotyło P, Zamysłowska-Szmytke E, Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M, Szadkowska-Gajda A. Individual susceptibility to noiseinduced hearing loss: choosing an optimal method of retrospective classification of workers into noise-susceptible and noiseresistant groups. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2006;19(4):235–245.