Passage Planning System in Ports: An overview

• Autorzy: Yip T. L.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.09.04.04

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A conceptual model is proposed to monitor marine traffic through precautionary areas, which can provide us with a systematic control of passage planning in ports. On one hand, vessel traffic control has its special features and is fundamentally different from highway, air and pedestrian traffic control. The existing traffic control systems cannot be simply extended to vessel traffic control without addressing marine traffic features. On the other hand, existing vessel traffic control focuses on one ship or two ships but does not address the flows of marine traffic.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sea Ports; Passage Planning; Passage Planning System in Ports; Maritime Traffic; Traffic Control; Vessel Traffic Control; vessel traffic service (VTS); Passage Planning System (PPS)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, no. 4
• Strony: 483--487
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Yip T. L.

• The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Bibliografia

• 1 Andersson K., Hall W., Atkins S. & Feron E. 2003. Optimization‐based analysis of collaborative airport arrival planning, Transportation Science, 37(4), 422‐433.
• 2 Bech, M. 1968. “The reversed spiral test as applied to large ships”, Shipping World.
• 3 Chwang, A.T., Zhang, D.H. & Yip, T.L. 2002. Influence of navigation and reclamation on waves in Victoria Harbour, Transactions of Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Hong Kong, 9(2), 1‐5.
• 4 Cockcroft, A.N. & Lameijer, J.N.F. 1996. A guide to the collision avoidance rules: International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, Butterworth Heinemann.
• 5 Debnath, A.K. & Chin, H.C. 2010. Navigational traffic conflict technique: A proactive approach to quantitative measurement of collision risks in port waters. Journal of Navigation, 63(1): 137‐152.
• 6 Fowler, T.G. & Sorgard, E. 2000. Modeling ship transportation risk, Risk Analysis, 20(2): 225‐244.
• 7 Gazis, D.C. 2002. Traffic Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• 8 IMO (1985). Guidelines for Vessel Traffic Serves, Resolution A.578(14),
• 9 Lam, S.Y.W. & Yip, T.L. 2008a. The role of geomatics engineering in establishing the marine information system for maritime management, Maritime Policy and Management, 35(1): 53‐60.
• 10 Lam, S.Y.W. & Yip, T.L. 2008b. Hydrographic surveying and mapping for the coastal construction of Hong Kong Disneyland, Geomatrica, 62(4): 45‐51.
• 11 Lam, S.Y.W. & Yip, T.L. 2009. Integrated marine information system for port utilities management and safety, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Utility Management and Safety, Hong Kong, 1‐4 March 2009, pp. 86‐94.
• 12 Lighthill, M.J. & Whitham, G.B. 1955. On kinematic waves II: A theory of traffic on long crowded roads, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 229A: 317‐345.
• 13 Merrick, J.R.W., van Dorp, J.R., Mazzuchi, T., Harrald, J.R., Saphn, J.E. & Grabowski, M. 2002. The Prince William Sound risk assessment, Interface, 23(6): 25‐40.
• 14 Montewka, J., Hinz, T., Jujala, P., & Matusiak, J. 2010. Probability modelling of vessel collisions, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 95(5): 573‐589.
• 15 Nomoto, K., Taguchi, T., Honda, K. & Hirano S. 1957. On the steering qualities of ships, International Shipbuilding Progress, volume 4.
• 16 Norrbin, N.H. 1963. On the design and analysis of the zigzag test on base of quasi linear frequency response, SSPA Report No. B104‐3, 10th ITTC, London.
• 17 Park, B.J., Zhang, Y. & Lord, D. 2010. Bayesian mixture modelling approach to account for heterogeneity in speed data. Transportation Research Part B, 44(5): 662‐ 673.
• 18 Pedersen, P.T. 2002. Collision risk for fixed offshore structures close to high‐density shipping lanes, Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 216(1): 29‐44.
• 19 Pederson, P.T. 2010. Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures, Marine Structures, 23 (3): 241‐262.
• 20 Richards, P.I. 1956. Shock waves on the highways, Operations Research, 4: 42‐51.
• 21 Tan, B. & Otay, E.N. 1999. Modelling and analysis of vessel casualties resulting from tanker traffic through narrow waterways, Naval Research Logistics, 46(8): 871‐892.
• 22 USCG (1999). Regulatory Assessment Use of Tugs to Protect Against Oil Spills in the Puget Sound Area, Report No. 9522‐002, United States Coast Guard.
• 23 Wong, G.C.K. & Wong S.C. (2002). A multi‐class traffic flow model – an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers. Transportation Research Part A, 36(9): 827‐841.
• 24 Yip, T.L. 2004. Marine Traffic Risk Assessment for Hong Kong Waters, submitted to Hong Kong Marine Department.
• 25 Yip, T.L. 2008a. Port traffic risks – A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters, Transportation Research Part E, 44(5): 921‐931.
• 26 Yip, T.L. 2008b. Port ship accidents and risks, In: MaritimeSafety, Security and Piracy (ed. Wayne K. Talley), London: Informa, Chapter 10, 169‐194.
• 27 Yip, T.L. (2013). A marine traffic flow model, TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(1), 109‐113.
• 28 Zhang, D.H., Yip, T.L. & Ng, C.O. (2009). Predicting tsunami arrivals: Estimates and policy implications, Marine Policy, 33(4): 643‐650.