Use of analytical hierarchy process in dairy cattle barn site selection

• Autorzy: Delice Hatice , Yaslıoglu Erkan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The first thing to do when planning dairy cattle barns is to determine a suitable management location. Site selection is a very important decision, as it will be difficult and costly to compensate for the mistakes made after the establishment of the enterprise. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is used in the solution of complex problems, creates a hierarchical structure in the decision-making process in the form of purpose, criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives. AHP is defined as the method of choosing the best among many alternatives. In this study, 5 main criteria (topography, land use, marketing conditions, environmental factors and infrastructure adequacy) and 20 sub-criteria were determined in order to determine suitable areas for dairy cattle barns. In order to determine the weighted values of the criteria, a total of 30 surveys were conducted with academicians who are experts in their fields, agricultural engineers working in the livestock sector and officials working on animal production in institutions.According to the results of the survey, it has been revealed that the most important criterion among the main criteria is environmental factors. Considering the paired comparison results of the sub-criteria; it was concluded that among the topography criteria, the importance levels of the slope criteria are higher than the others. Besides, land use capability among the land use criteria; milk processing potential among marketing conditions criteria; distance to settlements among environmental factors criteria; among the criteria of environmental factors, distance to settlement areas and distance to drinking water basin protection areas; among the infrastructure adequacy criteria, proximity to electricity services are higher than the others.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

livestock enterprise; dairy cattle barns; analytical hierarchy process

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Czasopismo: Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr I/1
• Strony: 75--83
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Delice Hatice

• Bursa Uludag University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Bursa, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-2154

autor

Yaslıoglu Erkan

• Bursa Uludag University, Agricultural Faculty, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-7863

Bibliografia

• 1. Aras, H., Erdogmuş, I., Koç, E., (2004). “Multi-Criteria Selection for a Wind Observation Station Location Using Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Renewable Energy, 29(8): 1383-1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.020.
• 2. Arıcı, I., Simşek, E., Yaslıoglu, E., (2005). Planning of Dairy Barns. Sütaş Dairy Livestock Training Center Publications, Livestock Series: 4, 26s, Bursa (In Turkish).
• 3. Olgun, M. (2011). Agricultural Structures (Second Edition). Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Publication No: 1577, Textbook: 529, Ankara; 1-445 (In Turkish).
• 4. Dogramacı, S., (2009). Mass Housing Site Selection with Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods Supported by Geographic Information System. Master Thesis, YTU, Institute of Science and Technology, Istanbul (In Turkish). SSN: 2146-8168.
• 5. Erkut, E., Moran, S. R., (1991). Locating Obnoxious Facilities In The PublicSector: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to MunicipalLandfill Siting Decisions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 25(2): 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(91)90007-E.
• 6. Eldrandaly, K., Eldin, N., Sui, D., (2003). A COM-based Spatial Decision Support System for Industrial Site Selection. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 7(2): 72-92, ISSN 1480-8943.
• 7. Ishizaki, A., Nemery, P., (2013). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. Jon Wiley & Sons, Ltd, United Kingdom. DOI:10.1002/9781118644898.
• 8. Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E., (2015). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Solving Operational, Managerial and Strategic Problems for Businesses, Engineers and Managers. Dora Publications, Bursa (In Turkısh).
• 9. Tzeng, G.H., Teng, M.H., Chen, J., Oprıcovıc, S., (2002). Multicriteria Selection for a Restaurant Location in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(2): 171-187, DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4319(02)00005-1.
• 10. Wu, C. R., Lin, C.T., Chen, H.C., (2007). Optimal Selection of Location for Taiwanese Hospitals to Ensure a Competitive Advantage by Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Sensitivity Analysis. Building and Environment, 42(3): 1431-1444, DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.12.016.
• 11. Oztürk, D., Kılıc, F. (2010). Using the analytical hierarchy method in spatial decision making problems. Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 28, 124-137.
• 12. Kocamaz, M., Soyuer, H., (2002). Computer Aided Human Resource Evaluation and Selection Process in Businesses, http://www.bilgiyonetimi.org/cm/pages/mkl_gos.php?nt=236, (Access date: 18.11.2012).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).