Evaluation of the international conference center mega-project in Isfahan Metropolis

• Autorzy: Nooraie H. , Yadegari A. , Ghorbani M. , Ghorbani S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21307/ACEE-2018-005

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the megaprojects under construction in the Isfahan metropolis is the project of the International Conference Center of the Isfahan Metropolis, which, despite the multidimensional and profound effects, has not yet been fully explored. Hence, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the megaproject of the international conference center of the Isfahan metropolis in terms of various physical, social, economic, managerial and environmental dimensions. Accordingly, the mixed research (combination of Qualitative and Quantitative methods) paradigms have been used. The data have been also collected by means of both document and survey methods (interview type). For evaluation and analysis, Likert scale, AHP method and Expert Choice software have been used. The results show that, despite the positive features of the Megaproject in the social, physical, and environmental sectors, this megaproject in the economic and management sector has major weaknesses, most notably is non-matching of costs with efficiency and non-achievement of objectives over the specified time. So there are some suggestions to address this defect.

PL

Jednym z megaprojektów budowanych w metropolii Isfahan jest projekt Międzynarodowego Centrum Konferencyjnego Metropolii Isfahan, które pomimo wielowymiarowych i dogłębnych analiz nie zostało jeszcze w pełni zbadane. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest ocena megaprojektu pod względem zróżnicowanych aspektów fizycznych, społecznych, ekonomicznych, zarządczych i środowiskowych. W związku z tym wykonano połączone badania - kombinację metod jakościowych i ilościowych. Dane zostały zebrane za pomocą zarówno dokumentów jak i metod sondażowych (typ wywiadu). Do oceny i analizy użyto skali Likerta, metody AHP i oprogramowania Expert Choice. Wyniki pokazują, że prócz pozytywnych cech megaprojektu w sektorach społecznym, fizycznym i środowiskowym, megaprojekt w sektorze gospodarczym i zarządzania ma wiele niedociągnięć a w szczególności wykazuje nieadekwatne odniesienie kosztów do osiągniętych celów w określonym czasie. Wprowadzone zostają sugestie naprawcze odnoszące się do tego błędnego rozwiązania.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

evaluation; megaproject; international conference center; Isfahan Metropolis

PL

ocena; megaprojekt; międzynarodowe centrum konferencyjne; Metropolia Isfahan

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 11, no. 1
• Strony: 43--57
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Nooraie H.

• Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

autor

Yadegari A.

• Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Daneshpajoohan Pishro Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran

autor

Ghorbani M.

• Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Daneshpajoohan Pishro Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran

autor

Ghorbani S.

• Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, Daneshpajoohan Pishro Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran

Bibliografia

• [1] Rossi, Peter H., Lipsey, Mark, W., and Freeman, Howard, E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Sage Publications.
• [2] Ariana, A. and Salehi Najafabadi, M. (2015). Introduction of post-implementation assessment methods of urban development programs (with the emphasis on Tehran Master Plan document). Tehran: Secretary of the Supreme Council for Urban Development.
• [3] Project Management of Isfahan Conferences Center. (2015). Report on Knowledge and Fundamentals of Structural Principles. Assistance of urban development of Isfahan municipality.
• [4] HadiZadeh Zargar, S. (2012). Measurement and assessment of social sustainability (Case study: Mashhad neighborhoods). Master's thesis of Isfahan University of Art. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning.
• [5] Mohammadi, M. (2014). Measuring and assessing the sustainability of urban neighborhoods with the emphasis on the notion of quality of life.Master’s thesis of Isfahan University of Art. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning.
• [6] Lehtonen, M. (2014) Evaluating megaprojects: from the “iron triangle” to network mapping. Evaluation, 20(3). 278-295.
• [7] Zidane, Y J-T., Johansen, A., Ekambaram, A. (2015). Project Evaluation Holistic Framework - Application on Megaproject Case. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 409-416.
• [8] Ghasemirad, H. (2010). Assessment of the detailed plan of Izeh. Master’s thesis of Isfahan University of Art. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning.
• [9] Kiakejori, S. (1986). Monitoring and evaluation of rural development. Tehran: Plan and Budget Publications.
• [10] Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010). Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects. CPL bibliography, 24(4), 343-361.
• [11] Yarihesar, A, Badri, A., Pourtaheri, M. and Faraji Sabokbar, H. (2011). Measuring and assessing the sustainability of the rural area of Tehran metropolitan area. Rural Research, 89-122.
• [12] Qaragozlu, Z. (1896). The role of assessment in the urban and regional planning process and its common techniques. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
• [13] U.S. Green Building Council. (2005), LEED-NC Green Building Rating System For New Construction & Major Renovations, version 2.2.
• [14] Edinburgh International Conference Centre. (2017). About EICC. Available at: http://www.eicc.co.uk/about-eicc/ (Access on 10/3/2017).
• [15] ExCeL London. (2017). Experience more in the heart of London, Available at: https://www.excel.london/visitor/experience-london (Access on 22/3/2017).
• [16] Salonyab. (2016). Center for International Conferences of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Hall of Leaders’ Summit). Available at yon.ir/uIyV1, (Access on 2017/03/07).
• [17] Online Hamshahri (2016). Abbas Akhundi memories of the leaders’ summit hall building. Available at http://www.hamshahrionline.ir/details/202006, (Access on 2017/03/07).
• [18] Pirraz Consulting Planners, Architects & Engineers. (2000). I.R.Iran International Conference Center, Tehran (1997), Available at: http://www.pirraz.com/projects/iccc.html. (Access on 18/3/2017).
• [19] Johnson, R. B. and Christensen, L. (2014). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 4th Edition. SAGE Publications, Inc.
• [20] Cho, K. T. (2003). Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37(9-10), 1099-1119.
• [21] Ho, W., Xu, X. and Dey, P.K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24.
• [22] Moshkovich, H. M. (2009). Conceptual model for evaluating multiple criteria methods and systems. Review of Business Research, 9(4), 169-173.
• [23] Ganesh A. Devkar, Satyanarayana N. Kalidindi, (2013). Modeling and assessment of competencies in urban local bodies for implementing PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(1), 42-57.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018)