Economic efficiency of community-based flood risk management: An empirical study from Indonesia

• Autorzy: Sedyowati Laksni , Chandrarin Grahita , Nugraha Ginanjar I.K. , Nugroho Bambang

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2020.134214

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Flood risk management are considerably influenced by several factors, such as all sources of flooding, social circum-stances, policy and even the potential for local economic growth. To encourage government, business, community and other parties to continue investing in flood risk management projects, it is necessary to give understanding that the projects can also provide economic benefits through systematic predictions and assessments of costs, benefits and social values, especially on flood-affected communities. This study aims: (1) to develop knowledge and understanding on small-scale flood risk management project in Malang City, Indonesia, and; (2) to assess the economic efficiency of the project investment considering all benefits, both monetary and non-monetary. The research method is a mixed method combining quantitative questionnaires (N = 53 from 162 families) with qualitative in-depth interviews (N = 10) and field observations. The runoff discharge and the inundation depth were calculated using hydrology and hydraulic analysis, while the economic efficiency was analysed using cost benefit analysis (CBA). The results show that the community-based flood risk management system can reduce the flood risk up to 30% compared to before the implementation of that system. This system also provides direct financial benefits through the use of drainage channels for fish and vegetables farming. It causes the increase of the net social benefit about 70–90% and the net present value (NPV) greater than zero (NPV > 0). Therefore, the project investment is recommended to be proceeded.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

community participation; cost benefit analysis; economic efficiency; flood resilience; flood risk management; urban drainage

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: no. 46
• Strony: 200--208
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sedyowati Laksni

• University of Merdeka Malang, Faculty of Engineering, Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 62-64, 65146, Malang, Indonesia

autor

Chandrarin Grahita

• University of Merdeka Malang, Faculty of Engineering, Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 62-64, 65146, Malang, Indonesia

autor

Nugraha Ginanjar I.K.

• University of Merdeka Malang, Faculty of Engineering, Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 62-64, 65146, Malang, Indonesia

autor

Nugroho Bambang

• University of Merdeka Malang, Faculty of Engineering, Jl. Terusan Raya Dieng No. 62-64, 65146, Malang, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• BATICA J., GOURBESVILLE P. 2014. Flood resilience index-methodology and application [online]. International Conference on Hydroinformatics. CUNY Academic Works. [Access 01.10.2019]. Available at: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/ cc_conf_hic/433
• BOARDMAN A.E., GREENBERG D.H., VINING A.R., WEIMER D.L. 2018. Introduction to cost-benefit analysis. In: Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. 5th ed. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press p. 1–27. DOI 10.1017/978110823 5594.003.
• BOS F., ZWANEVELD P. 2017. Cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management and water governance in the Netherlands: An overview of one century. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3023983.
• Cap-Net, GWP, UNPD 2005. Integrated water resources management plans. Training and operational guide [online] pp. 98. [Access 05.10.2020]. Available at: https://www.gwp.org/ contentassets/f998a402e3ab49ea891fa49e77fba953/iwrmp-training-manual-and-operational-guide.pdf
• CLARKE J., MCCONKEY A., SAMUEL C., WICKS J. 2015. Delivering benefits through evidence: Quantifying the benefits of flood risk management actions and advice. Flood incident management and property level responses. Report – SCR090039/R Stage 3. Flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development programme. Bristol. Environment Agency. ISBN 978-1-84911-360-1 pp. 114.
• COLLINS K.A., HUNT W.F., HATHA-WAY J.M. 2008. Hydrologic comparison of four types of permeable pavement and standard asphalt in Eastern North Carolina. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. Vol. 13(12) p. 1146–1157. DOI 10.1061/ (ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1146).
• DAWSON R.J., BALL T., WERRITTY J., WERRITTY A., HALL J.W., ROCHE N. 2011. Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmental change. Global Environmental Change. Pergamon. Vol. 21(2) p. 628–646. DOI 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2011.01.013.
• DIEPERINK C., MEES H., PRIEST S., EK K., BRUZZONE S., LARUE C., MATCZAK P. 2016. Enhancing urban flood resilience as a multi-level governance challenge: An exploration of multi-level coordination mechanisms [online]. Nairobi Conference on Earth Systems Governance p. 1–26. [Access 01.10.2019]. Available at: http://earthsystemgovernance.net/nairobi2016/ wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Enhancing-urban-flood-resilience-as-a-multi-level-governance-challenge.pdf
• GERICKE O.J., SMITHERS J.C. 2014. Review of methods used to estimate catchment response time for the purpose of peak discharge estimation. Hydrological Sciences Journal. Vol. 59 (11) p. 1935–1971. DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.866712.
• GOMEZ-CUNYA L.A., FARDHOSSEINI M.S., LEE H.W., CHOI K. 2020. Analyzing investments in flood protection structures: A real options approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Vol. 43, 101377. DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019. 101377.
• GRAMES J., GRASS D., KORT P.M., PRSKAWETZ A. 2019. Optimal investment and location decisions of a firm in a flood risk area using impulse control theory. Central European Journal of Operations Research. Vol. 27. Iss. 4 p. 1051–1077. DOI 10.1007/s10100-018-0532-0.
• HAVEMAN R.H., WEIMER D.L. 2001. Cost benefit analysis. In: International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon. Elsevier Ltd. p. 2845–2851.
• JENKINS G.P., KUO C.Y., HARBERGER A.C. 2011. Cost-benefit analysis for insvestment decision. Cycle. Cambridge, USA. Independently Published. ISBN 179066750X pp. 599.
• KASPERSEN P.S., HALSNÆS K. 2017. Integrated climate change risk assessment: A practical application for urban flooding during extreme precipitation. Climate Services. Vol. 6 p. 55–64. DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.012.
• LUCKE T. 2014. Using drainage slots in permeable paving blocks to delay the effects of clogging: Proof of concept study. Water. Vol. 6(9) p. 2660–2670. DOI 10.3390/w6092660.
• MECHLER R., CZAJKOWSKI J., KUNREUTHER H., MICHEL-KERJAN E., BOTZEN W., KEATING A., MCQUISTAN C., COOPER N., O’DONNELL L. 2014. Making communities more flood resilient: the role of cost benefit analysis and other decision-support tools in disaster risk reduction [online]. White Paper, Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance pp. 76. [Access 31.01.2020]. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ 6079/60c9985581da00bf88f3f6a7b1ef384d5132.pdf?_ga=2.195546735.230688328.1583829136-2016696261.1567505245
• MENS M.J.P., KLIJN F., DE BRUJIN K.H., VAN BEEK E. 2011. The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environmental Science and Policy. Vol. 14(8) p. 1121–1131. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003.
• MLIT 2005. Manual for economic evaluation of flood control investment (Draft). Chiyoda. River Bureau Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism pp. 65.
• NICHOLS P.W.B., LUCKE T., DIERKES C. 2014. Comparing two methods of determining infiltration rates of permeable interlocking concrete pavers. Water. Vol. 6(8) p. 2353–2366. DOI 10.3390/w6082353.
• OECD 2016. Financial management of flood risks. Water intelligence online. Paris. IWA Publishing. Vol. OECD. ISBN 9781780408569. DOI 10.2166/9781780408576.
• ŠAKIĆ TROGRLIĆ R., WRIGHT G.B., ADELOYE A.J., DUNCAN M.J., MWALE F. 2018. Taking stock of community-based flood risk manage-ment in Malawi: Different stakeholders, different perspectives. Environmental Hazards. Vol. 17(2) p. 107–127. DOI 10.1080/17477891.2017.1381582.
• SAYERS P., YUANYUAN L., GALLOWAY G., PENNING-ROWSELL E., FUXIN S., KANG W., YIWEI CH., QUESNE T.L. 2013. Flood risk management: A strategic approach [online]. Paris. UNESCO. ISBN 978-92-3-001159-8. [Access 3.10.2019]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11540/81.
• SEDYOWATI L., SUHARDJONO S., SUHARTANTO E., SHOLICHIN M. 2017. Runoff velocity behaviour on smooth pavement and paving blocks surfaces measured by a tilted plot. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 33 p. 149–156. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2017-0030.
• SEDYOWATI L., TURIJAN, SUHARDJONO, SUHARTANTO E., SHOLI-CHIN M. 2018. Runoff behavior on urban road intersection based on flow profile simulation. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6(1) p. 32–44. DOI 10.14246/irspsd.6.1_32.
• TINGSANCHALI T. 2012. Urban flood disaster management. Procedia Engineering. Vol. 32 p. 25–37. DOI 10.1016/ j.proeng.2012.01.1233.
• TRAVER R. (ed.) 2014. Flood risk management: Call for a National Strategy. Virginia. ASCE Press. ISBN 978-0-7844-7858-5 pp. 42. DOI 10.1061/9780784478585.
• VAN DER POL T.D., VAN IERLAND E.C., GABBERT S. 2017. Economic analysis of adaptive strategies for flood risk management under climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Vol. 22(2) p. 267–285. DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9637-0.
• WEHN U., RUSCA M., EVERS J., LANFRANCHI V. 2015. Participation in flood risk management and the potential of citizen observatories: A governance analysis. Environmental Science and Policy. Vol. 48 p. 225–236. DOI 10.1016/j.envsci. 2014.12.017.
• WIKANTIYOSO R., SUHARTONO T. 2018. The role of CSR in the revitalization of urban open space for better sustainable urban development. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6(4) p. 5–20. DOI 10.14246/ irspsd.6.4_5.
• WIKANTIYOSO R., TUTUKO P. 2013. Planning review: Green city design approach for global warming anticipatory. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Vol. 1(3) p. 4–18. DOI 10.14246/irspsd.1.3_4.
• WMO 2013. Risk sharing in Flood Management, Flood Management. Geneva. World Meteorological Organization. Integrated Flood Management Tools series. Iss. 8 pp. 37 + IX.
• WMO/GWP 2006. Social aspects and stake-holder involvement in integrated flood management. Associated Programme on Flood Management. Geneva. World Meteorological Organization, Global Water Partnership. ISBN 92-63-11008-5 pp. 80.
• World Bank 2013. World development report 2014. Risk and opportunity – Managing risk for development. Washington, DC: A World Bank Group Corporate Flagship. ISBN 978-0-8213-9903-3. DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9903-3.