Managing social protection for ex-combatants: evaluating effectiveness through КРІ methodology

• Autorzy: Roshchyk Iryna , Bilan Yuriy , Mishchuk Halyna , Samoliuk Natalia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2025.31.1.14

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zarządzanie ochroną społeczną byłych kombatantów: ocena skuteczności z wykorzystaniem metodyki КРІ

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The management of the ex-combatants’ social protection is analysed using the KPI methodology. For this analysis, five blocks of indicators are adapted: “input” - funding allocated to ex-combatants’ social protection; “output” - ex-combatants’ participation in social programs; “activity” - funding per recipient and final performance of social protection; “mechanism” - administrative efforts required to achieve the intended outcomes; “control” - effectiveness of ex-combatants’ social protection compared to other population groups. The methodology has been tested in Ukraine using a system of 28 indicators available in 2020-2023. The lowest efficiency is typical for input indicators, mainly support programs funding (0.153 in 2022), the highest values were observed for activities indicators (ranging from 0,609 to 0.871). However, the essential distance from maximum level of 1.0 is obvious for all indicators. This approach allows for identifying existing gaps and opportunities to improve public management of ex-combatants’ social protection.

PL

Zarządzanie ochroną społeczną byłych kombatantów analizuje się przy użyciu metodyki KPI. Do tej analizy dostosowano pięć bloków wskaźników: „wkład” - środki przeznaczone na ochronę socjalną byłych kombatantów; „wynik” - udział byłych kombatantów w programach socjalnych; „działanie” - finansowanie na jednego beneficjenta i ostateczne wyniki ochrony socjalnej; „mechanizm” - działania administracyjne niezbędne do osiągnięcia zamierzonych rezultatów; „kontrola” - skuteczność ochrony socjalnej byłych kombatantów w porównaniu z innymi grupami ludności. Metodologia została przetestowana na Ukrainie przy użyciu systemu 28 wskaźników dostępnych w latach 2020-2023. Najniższa efektywność jest typowa dla wskaźników nakładów, głównie finansowania programów wsparcia (0,153 w 2022 r.), natomiast najwyższe wartości odnotowano dla wskaźników działań (od 0,609 do 0,871). Jednak w przypadku wszystkich wskaźników widoczna jest znaczna odległość od maksymalnego poziomu 1,0. Podejście to pozwala na identyfikację istniejących luk i możliwości poprawy zarządzania publicznego w zakresie ochrony socjalnej byłych kombatantów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ex-combatants; KPI; public management; social protection

PL

byli kombatanci; KPI; zarządzanie publiczne; ochrona socjalna

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 31, No. 1
• Strony: 248--263
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 55 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Roshchyk Iryna

• National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Department of Labour Resources and Entrepreneurship, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3155-2727

autor

Bilan Yuriy

• Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, Rzeszów, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-009X

autor

Mishchuk Halyna

• Faculty of Economics, Széchenyi Istvàn University, Egyetem tér 1, 9026 Győr, Hungary

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-3189

autor

Samoliuk Natalia

• National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Department of Labour Resources and Entrepreneurship, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-8558

Bibliografia

• 1.Ahmed, M., Garvin, M., (2022). Review of critical success factors and key performance indicators in performance assessment of P3 transportation projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(5), 04022045.
• 2.Aithal, P. S., Aithal, S., (2023). Key performance indicators (KPI) for researchers at different levels and strategies to achieve it. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(3), 294-325.
• 3.Aleksandrova, M., Costella, C., (2021). Reaching the poorest and most vulnerable: addressing loss and damage through social protection. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 121-128.
• 4.Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., (2022). Social protection in Europe, a comparative and correlative research. Administration and Public Management Review, 38, 31-45.
• 5.Anjomshoa, E., (2024). Key performance indicators of construction companies in branding products and construction projects for success in a competitive environment in Iran. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(5), 2151-2175.
• 6.Arango, MP, Zuilkowski, S., (2023). Differentiated meanings of education in the reintegration of ex-combatants in Colombia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44 (4), 509-521.
• 7.Aubakirova, Z., Zhidkoblinova, O., Komekbayeva, L., Khishauyeva Z., Spanova B. and Zhaparova, R., (2023). Economic Efficiency and Priorities of Public Administration Regulation: The Case of Kazakhstan. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 19(3), 191-200,
• 8.Bangura, I., (2023). Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Ex-combatants in Africa. Routledge.
• 9.Boldon, N. Y., Maury, R. V., Armstrong, N. and Van Slyke, R., (2017). The state of veteran entrepreneurship research: What we know and next steps. Institute for Veterans and Military Families. https://surface.syr.edu/ivmf/50
• 10.Cifuentes‐Faura, J., (2024). Corruption in Ukraine during the Ukrainian-Russian war: A decalogue of policies to combat it. Journal of Public Affairs, 24(1), e2905.
• 11.De Freitas, J. V., Oliveira, M. A. de, Veroneze, G.de M. and Pereira, M. S., (2021). The Use of the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Tool in Public Institutions: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(4), 26-33.
• 12.De Oliveira, P. H., Paschoalotto, M. A. C., de Godoy Delmônico, D. V., de Souza Coelho, F., Santos, F. C. A. and Escrivão Filho, E., (2020). Strategic management in public administration: a balanced scorecard applicability framework in school management. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 12(3), 458-482.
• 13.Dobrowolski, Z., Sulkowski, L. and Vida, I., (2022). The Negative Social Capital and Supreme Audit Insitutions: Cognitive Orientation and Practical Tips. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(4), 181-190.
• 14.Dudzevičiūtė, G., (2023). Dependence of economic growth on government expenditure by function in the Baltic states. Journal of International Studies, 16(1), 922.
• 15.Faria, P., Lezama, F., Vale, Z. and Khorram, M., (2021). A methodology for energy key performance indicators analysis. Energy Informatics, 4(1), 6.
• 16.Faveto, A., Traini, E., Bruno, G. and Chiabert, P., (2024). Review-based method for evaluating key performance indicators: an application on warehouse system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 130(1), 297-310.
• 17.Gomes, R. C., de Azevedo, C. B., (2024). Balanced Scorecard: A Literature Review to Trace its Trajectory in the Public Administration Domain. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-17.
• 18.Harris, J., (2012). Veterans, soldiers, and military families. In L. M. Healy and R. J. Link (Eds.), Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development and the profession (pp. 254-259). Oxford Academic.
• 19.Hue, H. T., Phuong, N. T. X., Yen, L. T. B., Lan, N. T., Chi, T. K. and Phung, L. T., (2023). Impacts of social assistance on child well-being in Vietnam: The mediating role of household welfare. VNU Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 1-15.
• 20.Igei, K., Takio, K., Aoyagi, K. and Takasaki, Y., (2021). Vocational training for demobilized ex-combatants with disabilities in Rwanda. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 13 (4), 360-384.
• 21.Jim-Suleiman, S., Ibiamke, A. and Fenan, N. V., (2021). A Review of Literature on the Concept, Motivations and Factors affecting the Successes of Veteran Entrepreneurs. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 9(4), 42-51.
• 22.Karpa, M., Akimov, O. and Kitsak, T., (2022). Social protection of military personnel in Ukraine: state and regional guarantees. Public Administration and Law Review, (4), 16-23.
• 23.Kuanaliyev, A., Taubayev, A., Kunyazov, Y., Ernazarov, T., Mussipova, L. and Saduakassova, A. (2024)- Digital and Economic Transformation in the Public Administration System. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20, (3), 63-78,
• 24.Kutasi, G., Marton, Á., (2020). The long-term impact of public expenditures on GDP-growth. Society and Economy, 42(4), 403-419.
• 25.Lapuente, V., Van de Walle, S., (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461-475.
• 26.Lozinskyi, I., (2023). Public control over the activities of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine: An introduction to the problem. Law Human Environment, 14, 37-49.
• 27.Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, (2024a). Administrative data in the meaning of the Law of Ukraine “On State Statistics,” collected by the Ministry of Veteran Affairs of Ukraine. https://data.gov.ua/dataset/034f43a4-133a-498f-8478-6076ed1013e4
• 28.Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, (2024b). Annual consolidated key financial indicators of the execution of financial plans by the Ministry of Veteran Affairs of Ukraine. https://data.gov.ua/dataset/daade3d1-2fe9-4e77-875a-3fb2d0623534
• 29.Ministry of Finance of Ukraine., (2024). National Budget Web Portal for Citizens. https://openbudget.gov.ua/national-budget/expenses?class=program
• 30.Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N. and Bilan, Y., (2019). Measuring social justice in the light of effectiveness of public distributive policy. Administration and Public Management Review, (32), 63-76.
• 31.O'Brien, C. A., (2021). Assessing Cost-effectiveness in Reintegrating Ex-combatants in Colombia. In Infrastructure, Morality, Food and Clothing, and New Developments in Latin America (pp. 217-252). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• 32.Onuki, M., Aoyagi, K. and Takasaki, Y., (2022). Personal intergroup contact between different groups of ex‐combatants and civilians: Evidence from a behavioural experiment in Rwanda. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 1-17.
• 33.Orlov, V., Bukhtiarova, AH, Marczuk, M. and Heyenko, M., (2021). International economic and social determinants of the state economic security: A causal analysis. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 301-310.
• 34.Özerdem, A., (2022). Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants. Contemporary Peacemaking: Peace Processes, Peacebuilding and Conflict, 333-354.
• 35.Parry, J., Aymerich, O., (2023). Reintegration of ex-combatants in a militarized society. Peacebuilding, 11 (1), 20-44.
• 36.Piekut, M., Rybaltowicz, J., (2024). Comparative study of government expenditure on social protection in the Visegrád Group and Benelux. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 280-294.
• 37.Rahayu, S., Yudi, Y., Rahayu, R. and Luthfi, M., (2023). The relationship of balanced scorecard perspectives and government organization performance measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(7), 1881-1902.
• 38.Saldner, S., (2020). Contextualising reintegration: Conceptualising and measuring ex-combatant reintegration relative to civilians. Civil Wars, 22(4), 453-477.
• 39.Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y. and Mishchuk, H., (2023). Managing a veteran business: topicality and opportunities for social adaptation of combatants. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 295-310.
• 40.Sedefoğlu, G., Dudek, H., (2024). Material and social deprivation in the European Union: Country-level analysis. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 23-35.
• 41.Semigina, T., Stoliaryk, O., (2024). Working with Ex-combatants in Ukraine: Implications for Local and International Social Work Academia. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 1-11.
• 42.Sharif, S., (2018). A critical review of evidence from ex-combatant re-integration programs. Politics of Return (2). Social Science Research Council (Great Britain), London, UK. URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/90890
• 43.State Employment Service of Ukraine, (2024а). Grants for veterans and their family members https://dcz.gov.ua/stat/statgrant
• 44.State Employment Service of Ukraine, (2024b). Analytical and statistical information. https://old.dcz.gov.ua/analitics/68
• 45.Suarez, C., Baines, E., (2022). 'Together at the heart': Familial relations and the social reintegration of ex-combatants. International Peacekeeping, 29(1), 1-23.
• 46.Suksanchananun, W., Kot, S., Chaiyasoonthorn, W. and Chaveesuk, S., (2024). The model of White Supply Chain Management for sustainable performance in the food industry. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(4), 1405-1448.
• 47.Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K., Bogaczyk, R. (2023). Organisational Climate and Employee Engagement-a Case Study of International Corporations. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 11(3), 9-29.
• 48.Szymańska, A., (2022). Analysis of the effects of fiscal policy shocks in the Baltic region. Journal of International Studies, 15(2), 226-247.
• 49.UVF., (2024a). Reports of the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine. https://veteranfund.com.ua/zviti/
• 50.UVF., (2024b). Competitive programs for financing veteran business projects. https://veteranfund.com.ua/en/competitions/
• 51.Walker, N. L., Williams, A. P. and Styles, D., (2020). Key performance indicators to explain energy and economic efficiency across water utilities, and identifying suitable proxies. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110810.
• 52. Williams, C., Sauka, A., (2022). Developing Methodology and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Measuring the Effectiveness of Labour Inspectorates. European Labour Authority. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4385030
• 53.Yurchyk, H., Mishchuk, H. and Bilan, Y., (2023). Government assistance programs for internally displaced persons: assessing the impact on economic growth and labour market. Administratie si Management Public, 41, 201-218.
• 54.Yurchyk, H., Mishchuk, H., Bilan, S. and Scare, M., (2024). Social expenditure multiplier: Assessment of economic effect and optimal values. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 182-195.
• 55.Zayats, D., Serohina, N., Bashtannyk, O., Akimova, A., Akimov, O. and Mazalov, A., (2024). Economic Aspects of Public Administration and Local Government in the Context of Ensuring National Security. Economic Affairs , 69 (2), 979-988.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).