Introducing GIS to TransNav and its Extensive Maritime Application: An Innovative Tool for Intelligent Decision Making?

Baylon, A. M.; Santos, E. M. R.

doi:10.12716/1001.07.04.11

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Introducing GIS to TransNav and its Extensive Maritime Application: An Innovative Tool for Intelligent Decision Making?

Autorzy

Baylon A. M. , Santos E. M. R.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Introducing GIS to TransNav and its Extensive Maritime Application_ An Innovative Tool for Intelligent Decision Making_.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.07.04.11

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This paper aims to introduce GIS, its definition, principle, application in any discipline particularly maritime, its process, data sets and features and its benefits to maritime and universities. Specifically, the paper intends to provide an overview of its wide applications in maritime including but not limited to marine transportation, marine environment, port management and operation, maritime education and training (MET) and maritime research. GIS simplest task is in mapping and visualization. But its most important function is in spatial analysis. Spatial analysis takes into account the location, geometry, topology, and relationships of geographic data, which lend itself to intelligent decision making. GIS is not just for researchers and students. GIS is especially useful for decision makers such as: managers, administrators, and directors of large and small projects. Scenarios are “seen” and analyzed even before events happen. To planners and decision makers, this is very important because they can assess the impact of events or scenario and may save a lot of time, effort, and money before implementing the actual project. An additional skill on GIS when learned or thought would certainly result to a technically competent maritime global workforce. The paper would provide ideas on possible areas for collaborations among TransNav member institutions for data sharing which may be processed and analyzed by a GIS specialist.

Słowa kluczowe

geographic information system (GIS) GIS Technology Maritime Education and Training (MET) TransNav Maritime Applications intelligent decision making Innovative Tool Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS)

Wydawca

Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University

Czasopismo

TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation

Rocznik

2013

Tom

Vol. 7, no. 4

Strony

557--566

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 79 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Baylon A. M.

Maritime Academy of Asia and the Pacific (MAAP), Philippines

autor

Santos E. M. R.

Maritime Academy of Asia and the Pacific (MAAP), Philippines

Bibliografia

1. Aarsather K. G., Moan T. 2010. Computer Vision and Ship Traffic Analysis: Inferring Maneuver Patterns from the Automatic Identification System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 303‐308
2. Aarsather K. G. & Moan T. 2007. Combined Maneuvering Analysis, AIS and Full‐Mission Simulation. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31‐36
3. Aguilar E. D., Jaworski L., Kolodziejczak M. 2008. Accuracy Analysis of the EGNOS System during Mobile Testing. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 37‐41
4. Ambroziak S.J., et. al. 2011. Ground‐based, Hyperbolic Radiolocation System with Spread Spectrum Signal ‐ AEGIR. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 233‐238
5. Arai Y., Pedersen E., Kouguchi N., Yamada K. 2011. Onboard Wave Sensing with Velocity Information GPS. TransNav‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 205‐ 211, 2011
6. Banachowicz A. & Wolejsza P. 2008. The Analysis of Possibilities How the Collision Between m/v ʹGdyniaʹ and m/v ʹFu Shan Haiʹ Could Have Been Avoided. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 377‐ 381
7. Baylon, AM & Santos, EMR 2013. GIS as an Innovative Tool for MET, Research and Campus Management Enhancement: MAAP Initiatives, Weintrit A ; Neumann T ( eds) : STCW, MET , HR and Crew Manning , Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation : A Ballema Book on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation on Transportation , CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton, London‐New York‐ Leiden 2013 pp 13‐ 22.
8. Bober R., Szewczuk T., Wolski A. 2008. An Effect of Urban Development on the Accuracy of the GPS/EGNOS System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 235‐238
9. Bober R., Szewczuk T., Wolski A.2010. Effect of Measurement Duration on the Accuracy of Position Determination in GPS and GPS/EGNOS Systems. TransNav‐International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 295‐ 299
10. Bosy J., Graszka W. & Leonczyk M.2007. ASG‐EUPOS ‐ a Multifunctional Precise Satellite Positioning System in Poland. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 371‐374
11. Boykov A. & Katenin V. 2012. About Effectiveness of Complex Using of Satellite and Geoinformation Technologies on the Ship of Compound ‘River‐Sea’ Type. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 475‐479
12. Bukaty V. M. & Morozova S.U. 2010. Possible Method of Clearing‐up the Close‐quarter Situation of Ships by Means of Automatic Identification System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 309‐313
13. Bukaty V. M. & Morozova S.U. 2010. On Determination of the Head‐on Situation under Rule 14 of Colreg‐72. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 383‐ 388
14. Cimons, M. 2011. Geospatial Technology as a Core Tool Content provided by National Science Foundation. U.S. News & World Report, 11 May 2011. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.usnews.com
15. Crossworld Marine Services. 2011. 400,000 Filipino Seafarer Deployed Overseas while demands continue to grow. 23 September 2011. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://www.crossworldmarine.com
16. Drozd W., Dziewicki M., Waraksa M., Bibik Ł. 2007. Operational Status of Polish AIS Network. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 251‐253
17. Dziedzicki M. 2009. Modernization of Maritime DGPS in Poland. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 39‐42, 2009
18. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 2012. GIS Solutions for Ports and Maritime Transport. Retrieved August 23, 2012 from http://www.esri.com/library/ brochures/pdfs/gis‐sols‐for‐ports.pdf
19. Fellner A., Cwiklak J., et. al., 2008. GNSS for an Aviation Analysis Based on EUPOS and GNSS/EGNOS Collocated Stations in PWSZ CHELM. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 351‐356
20. Fellner A., Banaszek K. & Tróminski P. 2010. Alternative for Kalman Filter – Two Dimension Self‐learning Filter with Memory. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 429‐431
21. Fukuda G. & Hayashi S. 2010. The Basic Research for the New Compass System Using Latest MEMS. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 317‐322, 2010
22. Grzegorzewski M., et. a.l, A. 2008. GNSS for an Aviation. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 345‐350
23. Gucma L. & Marcjan K. 2012. Incidents Analysis on the Basis of Traffic Monitoring Data in Pomeranian Bay. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 377‐ 380
24. Harati‐Mokhtari A., et. al., 2007. AIS Contribution in Navigation Operation‐ Using AIS User Satisfaction Model. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 243‐249
25. Hsu, J. 2010. Robot Balloon Cranes Could Revolutionize World’s Seaports. Live Science, 7 March 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.livescience.com
26. Hu, Q., Yu, L. & Chen, J. 2007. A Method to Build Web Raster Chart System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 171‐174
27. Hu Q., Yong, J., Shi, C. & Chen, G. 2010. Evaluation of Main Traffic Congestion Degree for Restricted Waters with AIS Reports. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 55‐58
28. Ilcev S. D. 2011. Maritime Communication, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS). TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 39‐50
29. Im N. & Seo J.‐H. 2010. Ship Manoeuvring Performance Experiments Using a Free Running Model Ship. TransNav‐International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 29‐33
30. Janota, A. & Koncelík V.2010. GPS‐based Vehicle Localisation. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 289‐294, 2010
31. Januszewski J. 2010. A Look at the Development of GNSS Capabilities over the Next 10 Years. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 73‐78, 2011
32. Januszewski, J. 2007. Modernization of Satellite Navigation Systems and Theirs New Maritime Applications. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 39‐45
33. Krata P., Jachowski J., & Montewka J. 2012. Modeling of Accidental Bunker Oil Spills as a Result of Ship’s Bunker Tanks Rupture – a Case Study. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 495‐500
34. Krol A., Stupak T., et. al. 2011. Fusion of Data Received from AIS and FMCW and Pulse Radar ‐ Results of Performance Tests Conducted Using Hydrographical Vessels “Tukana” and “Zodiak”. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 463‐469
35. Kwiatkowski M., et. al. 2012. Integrated Vessel Traffic Control System. TransNav ‐ International Journal onMarine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 323‐327
36. International Hydrographic Office (IHO) and Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service of the Chilean Navy (SHOA). IHO S‐100: The New IHO Hydrographic Geospatial Standard for Marine Data and Information. (2009). Retrieved August 31, 2012 from http:// icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009
37. International Hydrographic Office (IHO). IHO S‐101: The Next Generation ENC Product Specification. Retrieved August 31, 2012 from http://www.iho.int/mtg_docs
38. GEBCO. 2012. General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans. 25 June 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2012 from http://www.gebco.net
39. Geo Maritime. 2012. Geo Maritime Meeting: 13‐14 June, St. Pauls – Geospatial Information in the Maritime Sector, June 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http:// www.wbresearch.com/geomar/agendadownload.aspx
40. Geo Maritime. Information Sharing and Interoperability in a Digital Era. (2012, June). Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.wbresearch.com/uploadedFiles/Events/UK/ 2012/21090_001/Download_Center_Content/Full%20agenda%20for%20website.pdf
41. Geotech Center. 2012. Geospatial Competency Model. (2012). Retrieved August 24, 2012 from http://www.careeronestop.org/competencymodel/pyramid.aspx?geo=Y
42. Global Administrative Areas. 2012. GADM Database of Administrative Areas, ver. 2. January 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2012 from http://www.gadm.org/
43. Janota A. & Koncelík V. 201. GPS‐based Vehicle Localisation. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 289‐294
44. Goerlandt F., et. al. 2012. Simplified Risk Analysis of Tanker Collisions in the Gulf of Finland. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 381‐387
45. Katdare, A. 2012. Tethered Air’s Robotic Balloon Crane Can Make any Shore a Seaport. Crazy Engineers. (2012, March 9). Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.crazyengineers.com/tethered‐airs‐roboticballoon‐ crane‐can‐make‐any‐shore‐a‐seaport‐1903
46. Kujawa L., Rogowski J. B. & Kopanska K. 2009: Positioning Using GPS and GLONASS Systems. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 283‐286, 2009
47. Lemanczyk M. & Demkowicz J. 2007. Galileo Satellite Navigation System Receiver Concept. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 375‐378, 2007
48. MarineCadastre.gov. MMC Viewer and Data Registry. Retrieved August 29, 2012 from http://marinecadastre.gov
49. MAPWINDOW. Mapwindow GIS version 4.8.6. Retrieved September 1, 2012 from http://www.mapwindow.org
50. Mazaheri A., et. al. 2012. A Decision Support Tool for VTS Centers to Detect Grounding Candidates. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 337‐343, 2012
51. Miyusov M.V., Koshevoy V.M. & Shishkin A.V. 2011. Increasing Maritime Safety: Integration of the Digital Selective Calling VHF Marine Radiocommunication System and ECDIS. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 159‐161
52. Narragansett Bay.org. RI Marine Data Download (Physical). Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.narrbay.org/physical_data.htm
53. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ‐ National Geophysical Data Center. Marine Geology Data. Retrieved August 29, 2012 from http://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/marine_geology
54. Naus K., Makar A., Apanowicz J.: Usage AIS Data for Analyzing Shipʹs Motion Intensity. TransNav International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 237‐242, 2007
55. Ni Ni HlaingYin, Hu Q., Shi Chaojian: Studying Probability of Ship Arrival of Yangshan Port with AIS (Automatic Identification System). TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 291‐294, 2011
56. Ocean Samp. RI Ocean Samp Project. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://www.narrbay.org
57. Park G.K. & Kim Young‐Ki. 2011. On a Data Fusion Model of the Navigation and Communication Systems of a Ship. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 51‐56
58. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration. 2010. Overseas Employment Statistics 2010. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://www.poea.gov.ph/stats/ 2010_Stats.pdf
59. Plata S. & Wawruch R.: 2009. CRM‐203 Type Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FM CW) Radar. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 311‐314
60. Rudolph J. 2007. ECDIS Operator Training. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 77‐81, 2007
61. Shippingedu.com. MSc International Maritime Studies – Marine Spatial Planning | Southampton Solent University. Retrieved August 29, 2012 from http://www.shippingedu.com/ournetwork/ southampton‐solent‐university/msc‐imsmarine‐ spatial‐planning.html
62. Stateczny A. & Kazimierski W. 2009. Target Tracking in RIS. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 385‐ 390
63. Stupak T. & Zurkiewicz S. 2011. Congested Area Detection and Projection – the User’s Requirements. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 285‐290
64. Transnav. 2013, Gdynia Maritime University and Nautical Institute Symposium Conference Main Topics. Retrieved September 2, 2012 from http://transnav2013.am.gdynia.pl/Symposium/conferenc e‐main‐topics.html
65. United Kingdom Hydrographic Office. 2007. REF 026B: A1‐ B1 M&C Functional Competencies. 21 June 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2012 from http://www.ukho.gov.uk/AboutUs/StaffPortal/Documents/Competences/REF026B.doc
66. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. 2010. Geospatial Technologies Introduction. 18 May 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://baegrisk.ddns.uark.edu/kpweb
67. US Embassy‐ Manila.2009. Seafarer Law. Powerpoint presentation. 15 October 2009. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://photos.state.gov/libraries/manila/19452/ pdfs/US%20Embassy%20Seafarer%20Law1.pdf
68. Vejrazka F., et. al. 2007. Software navigation receivers for GNSS and DVB. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 137‐141
69. Vejrazka F., Kovar P., Eska M., Puricer P.: Software navigation receivers for GNSS and DVB. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 137‐141, 2007
70. Wei Z., Liu, R. & Chang, L. 2007. The Research of Integrated Maritime Digital Information System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 193‐196
71. Weintrit, A. 2010. Six in One or One in Six Variants. Electronic Navigational Charts for Open Sea, Coastal, Off‐Shore, Harbour, Sea‐River and Inland Navigation. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 165‐ 177
72. Wikipedia. 2012. Filipino seamen. 18 August 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino_seamen
73. Wikipedia. 2012. Geomatics. 25 August 2012. Retrieved August 30, 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Geomatic
74. Wolejsza, P. 2010. Data Transmission in Inland AIS System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 179‐ 182
75. Xiang Z., et. al. 2012. Applied Research of Route Similarity Analysis Based on Association Rules. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 181‐185
76. Yang C., Hu Q., Tu X., & Geng J. 2012. An Integrated Vessel Tracking System by Using AIS, Inmarsat and China Beidou Navigation Satellite System. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 175‐178
77. Yoo Y., et. al. 2009. Application of 3‐D Velocity Measurement of Vessel by VI‐GPS for STS Lightering. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43‐48
78. Vejrazka F., Kovar P. & Kacmarík P. 2010. Galileo AltBOC E5 Signal Characteristics for Optimal Tracking Algorithms. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 37‐40
79. Yousefi, H. 2007. The Role of Navigational Aids Such as Radar/ARPA, ECDIS, AIS, Autopilot, on Safe Navigation at Sea. TransNav ‐ International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 177‐179

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-f920ac5f-051f-49cf-b05c-4c638a50e366