The Effects of Causation Probability on the Ship Collision Statistics in the Gulf of Finland

• Autorzy: Hanninen M. , Kujala P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland is studied by examining the collision probability estimates in a heavily used crossing area. In a commonly applied approach for estimating the probability of collision accidents, so-called number of collision candidates is multiplied with a so-called cau-sation probability. In this study a Bayesian network model for the causation probability estimation is applied with different parameter values in order to examine the effects of weather and human factors on collision probability in the crossing of Helsinki-Tallinn traffic and vessels navigating east- or westbound. The results show that the probability of collisions is very sensitive to the causation probability value and it should be modelled with great care to obtain reliable results.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Causation Probability; Ship Collision Statistics; Gulf of Finland; geometric probability; probability of collision

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 4, no. 1
• Strony: 79--84
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hanninen M.

• Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland

autor

Kujala P.

• Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland

Bibliografia

• [1] Det Norske Veritas. 2003. Formal Safety Assessment – Large Passenger Ships, ANNEX II.
• [2] Det Norske Veritas. 2006. Formal Safety Assessment of Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS). Technical Report No. 2005-1565, rev. 01.
• [3] Finnish Environment Institute. 2007. Oil transportation in the Gulf of Finland through main oil ports – Oil transportation in years 1995-2005 and estimated development by year 2015.
• [4] Finnish Meteorological Institute. (n.d.) Weather statistics. FMI www pages (online) [cited 8.12.2008] Available in www-format: <URL:http://www.fmi.fi/>.
• [5] Fowler, T. G. & Sørgård, E. 2000. Modeling Ship Transportation Risk. Risk Analysis 20(2): 225-244.
• [6] Friis-Hansen, P. & Simonsen, B.C. 2002. GRACAT: software for grounding and collision risk analysis. Marine Structures 15(4): 383-401.
• [7] Fujii, Y. & Shiobara, R. 1971. The Analysis of Traffic Accidents. Journal of Navigation 24(4): 534-543.
• [8] Fujii, Y., Yamanouchi, H. & Mizuki, N. 1974. Some Factors Affecting the Frequency of Accidents in Marine Traffic. II - The Probability of Stranding and III - The Effect of Darkness on the Probability of Collision and Stranding. Journal of Navigation 27(2): 239-247.
• [9] Fujii, Y. 1983. Integrated Study on Marine Traffic Accidents. IABSE Colloquium on Ship Collision with Bridges and Off-shore Structures, Copenhagen 42: 91-98.
• [10] Grabowski, M., Merrick, J. R. W., Harrald, J. R., Mazzuchi, T. A. & van Dorp, J. R. 2000. Risk Modeling in Distributed, Large-Scale Systems. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans. 30(6): 651-660.
• [11] Hetherington, C., Flin, R. & Mearns, K. 2006. Safety in ship-ping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research 37(4): 401-411.
• [12] Ihaksi, T., Helle, I., Lecklin, T., Ryömä, R., Kokkonen, T. & Kuikka, S. 2007. Using biological knowledge and decisions of society in spatial prioritization of oil combating, ICES CM 2007/C:02.
• [13] IMO. 2005. Revised Guidelines for the Identification and Designation of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs), Resolution A.982(24).
• [14] IMO. 2006. Formal Safety Assessment. Consideration on Utilization of Bayesian Network at Step 3 of FSA, Maritime Safety Committee 81st Session, MSC 81/18/1.
• [15] Jensen, F. V. & Nielsen, T. D. 2007. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd Edition. New York: Springer.
• [16] Klemola, E., Kuronen, J., Kalli, J., Arola, T., Hänninen, M., Lehikoinen, A., Kuikka, S., Kujala, P. & Tapaninen. U. 2008. A cross-disciplinary approach to minimising the risks of maritime transport in the Gulf of Finland. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, in Press.
• [17] Kujala, P., Hänninen, M., Arola, T. & Ylitalo, J. 2009. Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland. Sub-mitted manuscript.
• [18] Macduff, T. 1974. The probability of vessel collisions. Ocean Industry 9(9): 144–148.
• [19] Otto, S., Pedersen, P. T., Samuelides, M. & Sames, P. C. 2002. Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry. Marine Structures 15(4): 461-474.
• [20] Pedersen, P. T. 1995. Collision and Grounding Mechanics. Proceedings of WEMT'95: 125-127. Copenhagen: The Dan-ish Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
• [21] Rambøll. 2006. Navigational safety in the Sound between Denmark and Sweden (Øresund); Risk and cost-benefit analysis. Rambøll Danmark A/S.
• [22] Rosqvist, T., Nyman, T., Sonninen, S. & Tuominen, R. 2002. The implementation of the VTMIS system for the Gulf of Finland - a FSA study. RINA International Conference Formal Safety Assessment, London 18.-19.9.2002. The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (RINA): 151-164.
• [23] Rothblum, A. M. 2006. Human error and marine safety. Volume 4 in U.S. Coast Guard Risk-Based Decision-Making Guidelines. U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center, (online) [cited 8.12.2008]. Available in www-format: <URL:http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/risk/e-guidelines/RBDM/html/vol1/ContV4.htm>