Selection of multi-criteria decision making support systems for evaluation of variants of an integrated urban public transport system

• Autorzy: Solecka K.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Dobór metod wielokryterialnego wspomagania decyzji do oceny wariantów zintegrowanego systemu miejskiego transportu publicznego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Multi-criteria decision-making support methods are frequently used in solving transport-related problems. The most popular MCDM support methods include AHP, ANP, UTA, Electre, Oreste, and Promethee. However, not each of these methods may be applied to all types of problems, some of them are applied o problems of ranking while others to those of classification or choice. The paper presents the method selection methodology. By means of methodology verification, MCDM support methods for the evaluation of an integrated urban public transport system variants were selected where the methods were compared, among others, in terms of the decision-maker preference model, proceeding algorithm, and final ranking.

PL

Metody wielokryterialnego wspomagania decyzji wielokrotnie stosowane są do rozwiązywania problemów transportowych. Do najpopularniejszych metod WWD można zaliczyć AHP, ANP, UTA, Electre, Oreste, Promethee. Jednak nie każda z metod może być zastosowana do wszystkich rodzajów problemów, niektóre z nich stosowane są do problemów szeregowania, inne klasyfikacji czy wyboru. W artykule przedstawiono metodykę doboru metod. Jako weryfikację metodyki, dokonano wyboru metod WWD do oceny wariantów zintegrowanego miejskiego transportu publicznego, gdzie metody porównano ze sobą m.in. ze względu na model preferencji decydenta, algorytm postępowania oraz ranking końcowy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

decision support; integrated urban; public transport

PL

wspomaganie decyzji; zintegrowany system miejski; transport publiczny

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Logistyka
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 3299--3311
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab., pełen tekst na CD

Twórcy

autor

Solecka K.

• Politechnika Krakowska

Bibliografia

• [1] Benayoun R., de Montgolfier J., Tergny J., Laritchev O.: Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (STEM). Mathematical Programming, vol. 1, 3/1971, pp. 366-375.
• [2] Bouyssou D.: Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Springer Verlag. 2011.
• [3] Branke J., Deb K., Miettinen K., Słowiński R (ed.): Multiobjective optimization: interactive and evolutionary approaches. State of the Art Survey Series of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 5252/2008.
• [4] Brans J., Mareschal B, Vincke P.: Promethee: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. W: Brans J. (ed)/: Operational Research’84. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam 1984, pp. 408-421.
• [5] Choo E.U., Atkins D.R.: An interactive algorithm for multicriteria programming. Computers and Operations Research, 7/1980, pp. 81-87.
• [6] Edwards W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurements., Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60/1994, pp. 306-325.
• [7] Ehrgott M.: Multicriteria optymization. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
• [8] Figueira J., Greco p., Ehrgott M. (ed): Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer Science+ Bussines Media, Boston, 2005.
• [9] Geoffrion A., Dyer J., Feinberg A.: An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science, vol. 19, 1972, pp. 357- 368.
• [10] Giorgi L., Tandon A.: The Theory and Practice of Evaluation. TRANS-TALK CONTRACT NO. 1999-TN.10869, Vienna, 2000.
• [11] Jacquet-Lagreze E., Siskos J.: Assessing a Set of Additive Utility Functions for Multicriteria Decision Making, the UTA Method. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 10, 2/1982, pp.151–164.
• [12] Keeney R., Raiffa H.: Decisions with multiple objectives. Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
• [13] Kilgour D.M.: Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer Verlag, 2010.
• [14] Koksalan M.: Multiple criteria decision making. World Scientific Publishing Co Ltd., 2011.
• [15] Kopaliński W.: Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych. 1st Internet Edition. http://www.slownikonline.pl/kopalinski/9166D6B09B9554CFC12565ED00458E4F.php
• [16] Korhonen P., Wallenius J.: A modification of the Zionts-Wallenius multiple criteria methods for nonlinear utility functions, Helsinki School of Economics Press, Helsinki, 1985.
• [17] Lee D.B. : Methods for evaluation of transportation projects in the USA. Transport Policy, 7/2000, pp. 41-50.
• [18] Morisugi H.: Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in Japan. Transport Policy, vol. 7, 1/ 2000, pp. 35-40.
• [19] Niebieska Księga, Infrastruktura drogowa, Warszawa, Jaspers, 30 September 2008.
• [20] Solecka, K.: Wielokryterialna ocena wariantów zintegrowanego systemu miejskiego transportu publicznego. Praca doktorska, Politechnika Krakowska, 2013.
• [21] QUATRO - project of the European Union (Working Papers), D2: Definition and evaluation of quality in urban passenger transportation, D3: tendering and contracting of urban passenger transportation services, D4: Link between customer satisfaction and quality indices, Brussels, 1997.
• [22] Roubens M.: Preference relations on actions and criteria in multiple decision making. European Journal of Operation Research. vol.10., 1982, pp.51-55.
• [23] Roy B.: Decision aid and decision making. European Journal of Operational Research. vol.45/1990, pp. 324-331.
• [24] Roy B.: Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. WNT, Warszawa, 1990.
• [25] Saaty T.: Decision Making – The analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP), Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, published at Tsinghua University, Beijing Vol. 13, 1/2004, pp. 1-34.
• [26] Steuer R., Choo E.: An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Mathematical Programming, vol. 26, 1983, pp. 326-344.
• [27] Steuer R., Wood E.: A multiple objective markov reservoir release policy model. University of Georgia Press, Athens, 1986.
• [28] Steuer R.: An interactive multiple objective linear programming procedure. TIMS studies in the Management Science, vol. 6, 1977, pp. 225-239.
• [29] Vickerman, R.: Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom, Transport Policy, 7/2000, pp. 7-16.
• [30] Vincke P.: Multicriteria decision-aid. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1992.
• [31] Wierzbicki A.: The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. W: MCDM Theory and Application. Fandel G., Gal T. (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, pp. 468-486.
• [32] Zeleny M.: Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982.