Safety culture model in military aviation organisation

• Autorzy: Ciuică Oliver , Dragomir Cristian , Pușcă Bogdan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/sjsutst.2020.108.2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The list of organisational factors that may constitute accident premises represents a good analysis instrument, equally preventive, but also retrospective, in investigation situations. Forming an effective safety culture is a vital element of acquiring and maintaining an appropriate level of safety and implicitly limiting aviation events. The safety culture “growth” process starts by successfully choosing the right model for the organisation, evaluating the safety culture with the help of the right tools and capitalising the results by taking improvement measures. Once acquired, the safety culture gives the organisation an increased level of security and confidence, thus: low accident rate, active involvement and responsibility from all members, initiative in operations, safety procedures, direct and effective feedback, careful and constant research of procedures, continuous and intense training, setting performance standards both indoors and outdoors, planning several scenarios to create the required variety, the desire to try new ideas, accepting the risk, the failure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

safety culture; leadership; aviation; Air Force; military; training

PL

kultura bezpieczeństwa; przywództwo; lotnictwo; siły powietrzne; wojsko; szkolenie

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 108
• Strony: 15--25
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Ciuică Oliver

• Henri Coandă” Air Force Academy, Mihai Viteazul 160 Street, Brasov, Romania

autor

Dragomir Cristian

• Aurel Vlaicu” Air Force Training School, Boboc, Buzău county, Romania

autor

Pușcă Bogdan

• Romanian Air Force Headquarter, București-Ploiești Street, 10,5 Km, Bucharest, Romania

Bibliografia

• 1. Prentiss L., B.J. Brownfield. ”Aeronautical Decision Making”. Available at: http://www.avhf.com/html/Library/Aeronautical_Decision_Making.ppt.
• 2. AFI91-204 12 FEB 2014 - Air Force Instruction , Department of the Air Force Headquarters Air Force Safety Center, Washington, 2016.
• 3. AOPA. Available at: http://flighttraining.aopa.org/magazine/1999/September/199909_Features_Hazardous_Attitudes.html.
• 4. Reason J. 1997. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accident. Ashgate, England: Aldershot.
• 5. Reason J. 1990. Human Error, Cambridge. University Press, New York.
• 6. Williamson A., A. Feyer, D. Cairns, D. Biancotti. 1997. „The development of a measure of safety climate: the role of safety perceptions and attitudes”. Safety Science 25.
• 7. JAR-OPS 1 Subpart N Section 2 AMC OPS 1.943/1.945(a)(9)/1.965(b) (6)/1.965(e) -Crew Resource Management (CRM).
• 8. CANSO The Civil Air Navigation Services Organization. Safety Culture Definition and Enhancement Process. 11April 2013.
• 9. ICAO Doc 9856. „Safety Management Manual”. 2006.
• 10. Instructions on the technical investigation of aviation events produced with military aircraft. Bucharestt, General Staff of the Air Force. 2007.
• 11. Air Force Safety Center. Available at: http://www.afsec.af.mil/proactiveaviationsafety/asap/index.asp.