PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Ground-Active Arthropod Recovery in Response to Size of Shrub Plantations in a Desertified Grassland Ecosystem

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The ground-active arthropod diversity response to size of shrub plantations in desertified grassland ecosystems is largely unknown. In the study ground-active arthropods were collected by pitfall trapping beneath shrub canopy of very low, low, medium and high size, with adjacent mobile sandy land as a control. It was found that arthropod dominant taxa from mobile sandy land were significantly distinctive from those from plantations of different shrub size. A considerably lower Sørensen index (i.e., 0.25-0.48) was found between the arthropod communities from mobile sandy land and the canopy of either shrub size, than between those under low and medium/high shrub size (i.e., 0.62 to 0.69). The arthropod total abundance was significantly greater under the shrub canopy of very low size in comparison to that of low and medium shrub size and mobile sandy land, with the intermediate values under shrub canopy of high shrub size. Taxon richness and diversity of arthropod communities were distinctly lower under the shrub canopy of low size in comparison to very low, medium and high shrub size. The shrub size was found to have different effects on the density and richness distribution of arthropod trophic groups (i.e., predators, phytophagous, saprophagous, and omnivorous). It was concluded that shrub plantations could facilitate ground-active arthropod diversity recovery when they were afforested in mobile sandy land. There was a contrasting effect of shrub size on ground-active arthropod diversity recovery versus arthropod abundance when grazing was excluded.
Rocznik
Strony
410--422
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 44 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwestern China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
autor
  • Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwestern China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
autor
  • Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwestern China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
autor
  • School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China
autor
  • School of Life Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Huhht 010000, China
Bibliografia
  • [1] Alan B. C., Kwok A. B., Eldridge A. D. J. 2016 — The influence of shrub species and finescale plant density on arthropods in a semiarid shrubland — Rangeland. J. 38: 381-389.
  • [2] Andersen A. N., Sparling G. P. 1997 — Ants as indicators of restoration success: relationship with soil microbial biomass in the Australian seasonal tropics — Restor. Ecol. 5: 109-112.
  • [3] Burger J. C., Redak R. A., Allen E. B., Rotenberry J. T., Allen M. F. 2003 — Restoring arthropod communities in coastal sage scrub — Conserv. Biol. 17: 460-467.
  • [4] Callaway R. M., Walker L. R. 1997 — Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities — Ecology, 78: 1958-1965.
  • [5] Doblas-Miranda E., Sánchez-Piñero F., González-Megías A. 2009 — Different microhabitats affect soil macroinvertebrate assemblages in a Mediterranean arid ecosystem — Appl. Soil Ecol. 41: 329-335.
  • [6] Eldridge D. J., Soliveres S., Bowker M. A., Val J. 2013 — Grazing dampens the positive effects of shrub encroachment on ecosystem functions in a semi-arid woodland — J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 1028-1038.
  • [7] Johnson M. T. J., Agrawal A. A. 2005 — Plant genotype and environment interact to shape a diverse arthropod community on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) — Ecology, 86: 874-885.
  • [8] Kruess A., Tscharntke T. 2002 — Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity — Biodivers. Conserv. 106: 293-302.
  • [9] Lalley J. S., Viles H. A., Henschel J. R., Lalley V. 2006 — Lichen-dominated soil crusts as arthropod habitat in warm deserts — J. Arid Environ. 67: 579-593.
  • [10] Lenoir L., Lennartsson T. 2010 — Effects of timing of grazing on arthropod communities in semi-natural grasslands — J. Insect Sci. 10:1-24.
  • [11] Lightfoot D. C., Whitford W. G. 1989 — Interplant variation in creosotebush foliage characteristics and canopy arthropods — Oecologia, 81: 166-175.
  • [12] Liu J. L., Li F. R., Liu C. A, Liu Q. J. 2012 — Influences of shrub vegetation on distribution and diversity of a ground beetle community in a Gobi desert ecosystem — Biodiver. Conserv. 21: 2601-2619.
  • [13] Liu R. T, Zhao H. L, Zhao X. Y., Drake S. 2009 — Soil macrofaunal response to sand dune conversion from mobile dune to fixed dune in Horqin Sandy Land, North China — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 45: 417-422.
  • [14] Liu R. T., Chai Y. Q., Xu K. 2012 — Changes of soil and herbaceous properties during the growth of afforested Caragana plantation in desertified steppe — Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 2937-2942.
  • [15] Liu R. T., Chai Y. Q., Yang X. G. 2013a — Effect of shrub-cutting and grass-reseeding on the ground-active arthropod community in desertified steppe — Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 211-217.
  • [16] Liu R. T., Zhao H. L., Zhao X. Y., Drake S. 2011 — Facilitative effects of shrubs in shifting sand on soil macro-faunal community in Horqin Sand Land of Inner Mongolia, Northern China — Eur. J. Soil Biol. 47: 316-321.
  • [17] Liu R. T., Zhu F., Song N. P., Yang X. G., Chai Y. Q. 2013b — Seasonal distribution and diversity of ground arthropods in microhabitats following a shrub age sequence in desertified steppe — PLoS ONE, 8(10):e77962.
  • [18] Liu R. T., Zhu F., Steinberger Y. 2015 — Effect of shrub microhabitats on aboveground and belowground arthropod distribution in a desertified steppe ecosystem — Pol. J. Ecol. 63: 534-348.
  • [19] Lynam C. P., Llope M., Möllmannd C., Helaouët P., Bayliss-Brown G. A., Stenseth N. C. 2017 — Interaction between top-down and bottom-up control in marine food webs — PNAS USA, 114: 1952-1957.
  • [20] Mazía C. N., Chaneton E. J., Kitzberger T. 2006 — Small-scale habitat use and assemblage structure of 6 ground dwelling beetles in a Patagonian shrub steppe — J. Arid Environ. 67: 177-194.
  • [21] Moro M. J., Pugnaire F. I., Haase P, Puigdefábregas J. 1997 — Effect of the canopy of Retama sphaerocarpa on its understorey in a semiarid environment — Funct. Ecol. 11: 425-431.
  • [22] Pugnaire F. I., Lázaro R. 2000 — Seed bank and understorey species composition in a semi-arid environment: the effect of shrub age and rainfall — Annu. Bot. 86: 807-813.
  • [23] Ren G. D., Yu Y. Z. 1999 — The darkling beetles of Chinese desert and semidesert (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) — Hebei University Publishing House, Baoding.
  • [24] Rhoades D. F. 1983 — Herbivore population dynamics and plant chemistry (In: Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems, Eds: R. F. Denno, M. S. McClure) — Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 155-220.
  • [25] Riihimaeki J., Vehvilaeinen H., Kaitaniemi P., Koricheva J. 2006 — Host tree architecture mediums the effect of predators on herbivore survival — Ecol. Entomol. 31: 227-235.
  • [26] Samways M. J. 1992 — Some comparative insect conservation issues of north temperate, tropical, and south temperate landscape — Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40: 137-154.
  • [27] Schlinkert H., Westphal C., Clough Y., László Z., Ludwig M., Tscharntke T. 2015 — Plant size as determinant of species richness of herbivores, natural enemies and pollinators across 21 Brassicaceae species — PLoS ONE, 10 (8): e0135928.
  • [28] Schlinkert H. 2014 — Plant size gradient in Brassicaceae. figshare, http://figshare.com; 10.6084/m9. figshare.1246843.
  • [29] Schultz J. C. 1978 — Competition, predation, and the structure of phytophilous insect communities: A study of convergent evolution — Dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • [30] Schultz J. C. 1981 — Adaptive changes in antipredator behavior of a grasshopper during development — Evolution, 35: 175-179.
  • [31] Schultz J. C., Otte D., Enders F. 1977 — Larrea as a habitat component for desert arthropods (In: Creosote Bush: Biology and Chemistry of Larrea in New World Deserts, Eds: T. J. Mabry, J. H. Hunziker, D. R. Jr. Defeo) — US/IBP Synthesis Series 6. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA.
  • [32] Siemann E., Haarstad J., Tilman D. 1999 — Dynamics of plant and arthropod diversity during old field succession — Ecography, 22: 406-414.
  • [33] Southwood T. R. E, Brown V. K., Reader P. M. 1979 — The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession — Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12: 327-348.
  • [34] Takeda H., Abe T. 2001 — Templates of food—habitat resources for the organization of soil animals in temperate and tropical forests — Ecol. Res. 16: 961-973.
  • [35] Wang X. Y. 2013 — Biomass model of Caragana shrubs of different ages in desertified steppe — J. Biomath. 28: 377-383.
  • [36] Wardhaugh C. W., Stork N. E., Edwards W. 2012 — Feeding guild structure of beetles on Australian tropical rainforest trees reflects microhabitat resource availability — J. Anim. Ecol. 8: 1086-1094.
  • [37] Wardle D. A., Bardgett R. D., Klironomos J. N. et al. 2004. — Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota — Science, 304: 1629-1633.
  • [38] Wezel A., Rajot J. L., Herbrig C. 2000 — Influence of shrubs on soil characteristics and their function in Sahelian agro-ecosystems in semi-arid Niger — J. Arid Environ. 44: 383-398.
  • [39] Whitford W. G. 2000 — Keystone arthropods as webmasters in desert ecosystems (In: Invertebrates as webmasters in ecosystems, Eds: D. C. Coleman, P. F. Hendrix ) — CABI Publishing, London, pp. 25-42.
  • [40] Williams K. S. 1993 — Use of terrestrial arthropods to evaluate restored riparian woodlands — Restor. Ecol. 1: 107-116.
  • [41] Yin W. Y. 2001 — Pictorial Keys to Soil Faunas of China — Science Press, Beijing.
  • [42] Zhao H. L., Liu R. T. 2013 — The” “bug island” effect of shrubs and its formation mechanism in Horqin Sand Land, Inner Mongolia — Catena, 105: 69-74.
  • [43] Zhao X. Y., Luo Y. Y., Wang S. K., Huang W. D, Lian J. 2010 — Is desertification reversion sustainable in northern China? A case study in Naiman county, part of a typical agro-pastoral transitional zone in Inner-Mongolia, China — Global Environ. Res. 14: 63-70.
  • [44] Zheng L. Y., Gui H. 2004 — Insect Classification — Nanjing Normal University Press, Nanjing.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f7bffef8-4fff-462b-8924-b7ae26f3f980
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.