Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: This paper aims to assess the impact of entrepreneurial determinants on the sustainable development of enterprises in emerging EU economies from 2008 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is empirical, and it consists of conceptual background, research methodology, research results, discussions, and conclusions. The survey covers the enterprise sector in Bulgaria, Croatia, Poland, Romania, and Hungary (emerging and developing economies in the EU). I used the correlations coefficients and the Ordinary Least Square Method to verify the strength and direction of influence of entrepreneurial determinants on the sustainable development of enterprises. Findings: In the analyzed countries, there is a diversified influence of individual entrepreneurial determinants on the sustainable development of enterprises, both in terms of direction and strength of influence. Research limitations/implications: The paper has serious limitations in selecting and integrating indicators for the research. Further research requires considering a larger group of determinants, not only strictly entrepreneurial factors. Practical implications: The analysis results indicate that entrepreneurial factors influence the sustainable development of the enterprise sector; therefore, the authorities should coordinate activities and initiatives related to sustainable development and entrepreneurship. Creating financial and non-financial incentives is necessary to run a sustainable business. Social implications: Sustainable development is crucial for the conditions and quality of life. Separating entrepreneurial factors and creating effective institutional support for business initiatives is crucial for sustainable development. Originality/value: A novelty in the paper is an attempt to isolate entrepreneurial determinants of the sustainable development of enterprises. The article is intended for a wide audience, theoreticians and practitioners interested in sustainable development.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
375--391
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 43 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, Lodz
Bibliografia
- 1. Abdelkafi, N., Täuscher, K. (2016). Business models for sustainability. From a system dynamics perspective. Organization & Environment, 29(1).
- 2. Amodu, N. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Globalization: Mainstreaming Sustainable Development Goals into the AfCFTA Discourse', 47. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, retrieved from https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Legal+Issues+of+Economic+Integration/47.1/LEIE2020004.
- 3. Baker, S. (2015). Sustainable development. Introductions to Environment: Environment and Society Texts. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203121177.
- 4. Blinova, N.V., Kirka, A.V., Filimonov, D.A. (2021). Rational Bureaucracy 2.0: Public Administration in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. In: E.G. Popkova, V.N. Ostrovskaya, A.V. Bogoviz (eds.), Socio-economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 314. Cham.: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-56433-9_174.
- 5. Bocken, N.M. P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
- 6. Borys, T. (2011). Zrównoważony rozwój – jak rozpoznać ład zintegrowany. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 6.
- 7. Bryant, J., Thomson, G. (2021). Learning as a key leverage point for sustainability transformations: a case study of a local government in Perth, Western Australia. Sustain Sci., 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00808-8.
- 8. Ciambotti, G., Sottini, A., Littlewood, D., Meru, A.K. (2021). Business Models for Sustainable Development: The Case of a Kenyan Sustainable Enterprise. In: E.K. Adae, J.P.B. Kosiba, R.E. Hinson, K.K. Twum, N. Newman, F.F. Nutsugah (eds.), Responsible Management in Emerging Markets. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Cham.: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76563-7_9.
- 9. Comporek, M., Kowalska, M., & Misztal, A. (2022). Macroeconomic stability and transport companies’ sustainable development in the Eastern European Union. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15913.
- 10. Dantas, T.E.T., de-Souza E.D., Destro, I.R., Hammes, G., Rodriguez, C.M.T., Soares, S.R. (2021). How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.005.
- 11. Dissanayake, D., Tilt, C., Xydias-Lobo, M. (2016). Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.086.
- 12. Goralski, M.A., Tan, T.K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 100330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330.
- 13. Hahn, R., Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.
- 14. Hess, P.N. (2016). Economic Growth and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722467.
- 15. Hind, P., Wilson, A. and Lenssen, G. (2009). Developing leaders for sustainable business. Corporate Governance, 9, 1, pp. 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910936029.
- 16. https://www.oecd.org/sdd/business-stats/indicatorsofentrepreneurialdeterminants.htm.
- 17. Hummels, H., Argyrou, A. (2021). Planetary demands: Redefining sustainable development and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123804.
- 18. Ismail, N.B., Alcouffe, S., Galy, N., Ceulemans, K. (2021). The impact of international sustainability initiatives on Life Cycle Assessment voluntary disclosures: The case of France’s CAC40 listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 282, 124456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124456.
- 19. Khan, M.K., Trinh, H.H., Khan I.U., Ullah, S. (2021). Sustainable economic activities, climate change, and carbon risk: an international evidence. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10.1007/s10668-021-01842-x.
- 20. Kihombo, S., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S. et al. (2021). Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1.
- 21. Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2020). Financing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(7), 2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072775.
- 22. Lang, A., Murphy, H. (eds.) (2014). Business and sustainability. Cham.: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07239-5.
- 23. Latysheva, O., Rovenska, V., Smyrnova, I., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T. and Streimikiene, D. (2021). Management of the sustainable development of machine-building enterprises: a sustainable development space approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34, 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2019-0419.
- 24. Loh, L., Thomas, T., Wang, Y. (2017). Sustainability Reporting and Firm Value: Evidence from Singapore-Listed Companies. Sustainability, 9(11), 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su9112112.
- 25. Misztal, A. (2019). Zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw a stopień rozwoju społeczno- gospodarczego. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, 174. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2019.174.2.
- 26. Misztal, A. (2020). Podatki środowiskowe a zrównoważony rozwój polskich przedsiębiorstw transportowych. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, 1. https://doi.org/10.33226/1231-2037.2020.1.5
- 27. Misztal, A. (2021). Assessing the impact of the financial condition on the components of sustainable development of transport enterprises in Poland in 2008-2019. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 65,1.
- 28. Misztal, A., Kowalska, M. (2020). The impact of globalization on the sustainable development of enterprises – the case of Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64,3.
- 29. Newell, P. (2022). Finance for the Common Good: Re-Thinking the Relationship between Finance, Poverty and Sustainability. In: A. Antoniades, A.S. Antonarakis, I. Kempf (eds.), Financial Crises, Poverty and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges in the Context of the SDGs and Covid-19 Recovery. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Cham.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87417-9_2.
- 30. O’Shea, G., Farny, S. & Hakala, H. (2021). The buzz before business: a design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small. Bus. Econ., 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00256-4.
- 31. Orzeszyna, K., Tabaszewski, R. (2021). The Legal Aspects of Activities Taken by Local Authorities to Promote Sustainable Development Goals: Between Global and Regional Regulations in Poland. Lex Localis; Maribor, Tom 19. https://doi.org/10.4335/19.3.1043-1063.
- 32. Pawłowski, A. (2013). Sustainable Development and Globalization. Problemy Ekorozwoju, t. 8, 2. Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Człowiek i Środowisko PAN.
- 33. Pieloch-Babiarz, A., Misztal, A. & Kowalska, M. (2021). An impact of macroeconomic stabilization on the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises: the case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23, 8669-8698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00988-4.
- 34. Rodenburg, K., MacDonald, K. (2021). Enhancing Business Schools’ Pedagogy on Sustainable Business Practices and Ethical Decision-Making. Sustainability, 13(10), 5527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105527.
- 35. Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M. et al. (2019). Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Sustain, 2, 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.
- 36. Śleszyński, J. (2014). Podatki środowiskowe i podział na grupy podatków według metodyki Eurostatu. Optimum. Economic Studies.
- 37. Teng, X., Chang, B.-G., Wu, K.-S. (2021). The Role of Financial Flexibility on Enterprise Sustainable Development during the COVID-19 Crisis-A Consideration of Tangible Assets. Sustainability, 13(3), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031245.
- 38. Thacker, S., Adshead, D., Fay, M. et al. (2019). Infrastructure for sustainable development. Nat. Sustain., 2, 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8.
- 39. Tutaj, J., Rutkowska, M., Bartoszczuk, P. (2021). Enterprise Business Architecture as a Tool for Sustainable Development in an Enterprise – case study. Procedia Computer Science, 192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.283.
- 40. Valaskova, K., Kliestik, T., Svabova, L., Adamko, P. (2018). Financial Risk Measurement and Prediction Modelling for Sustainable Development of Business Entities Using Regression Analysis. Sustainability, 10(7), 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072144.
- 41. Weber, O. (2014). The financial sector's impact on sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 4:1, 1-8, DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2014.887345.
- 42. Zakari, A., Khan, I., Tan, D., Alvarado, R., Dagar, V. (2022). Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy, 239, Part E, ,122365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122365.
- 43. Ziolo, M., Sergi, B.S. (2019). Financing Sustainable Development Key Challenges and Prospects. Cham.: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16522-2.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f7bac662-f4fc-43dd-81f2-7735a5b8d5b2