Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Struktura własności i unikanie podatków od korporacji: przykłady z wymiennych spółek z Bangladeszu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of ownership structure on corporate tax avoidance. In the emerging economy context, the role of ownership structure on a corporate tendency to avoid the tax has become a burning issue over the years. This study is conducted on the basis of public limited companies listed on Dhaka Stock Exchange. A purposive sampling of 77 companies is considered to explore the impact of ownership structure on corporate tax avoidance. In this cross-sectional study, four proxy variables of ownership structure namely, institutional ownership, board ownership, foreign ownership and public ownership have been used. The regression model has been used to examine the association between corporate ownership structure and tax avoidance. Based on empirical study, it is found that board ownership and public ownership have significant influence on corporate tax avoidance, and no significant relationship can be found between foreign ownership and institutional ownership. These findings imply that companies with more board ownership and public (general) ownership tend to avoid tax in the context of Bangladesh. This study extends the existing literature by examining the impact of a diversified ownership structure on corporate tax avoidance in Bangladeshi companies. The findings of the study will help the government to shape their tax strategies in order to ensure optimum tax collection from the business.
Celem badania jest zbadanie wpływu struktury własności na unikanie opodatkowania przedsiębiorstw. W kontekście gospodarki wschodzącej, rola struktury własności w skłonności przedsiębiorstw do unikania podatku stała się palącą kwestią na przestrzeni lat. Niniejsze badanie jest przeprowadzane na podstawie spółek akcyjnych notowanych na giełdzie w Dhaka. Rozważa się celową próbę 77 firm w celu zbadania wpływu struktury własności na unikanie opodatkowania przez przedsiębiorstwa. W niniejszym badaniu przekrojowym wykorzystano cztery zmienne zastępcze struktury własności, a mianowicie własność instytucjonalną, własność zarządu, własność zagraniczną i własność publiczną. Model regresji został wykorzystany do zbadania związku między strukturą własności korporacyjnej a unikaniem opodatkowania. Na podstawie badania empirycznego stwierdzono, że własność zarządu i własność publiczna mają znaczący wpływ na unikanie opodatkowania przedsiębiorstw i nie można znaleźć żadnego istotnego związku między własnością zagraniczną a własnością instytucjonalną. Wyniki te sugerują, że firmy z większą liczbą członków zarządu i własnością publiczną (ogólną) mają tendencję do unikania podatków w kontekście Bangladeszu. Niniejsze badanie rozszerza istniejącą literaturę, badając wpływ zróżnicowanej struktury własności na unikanie opodatkowania przez firmy w Bangladeszu. Wyniki badania pomogą rządowi w kształtowaniu strategii podatkowych w celu zapewnienia optymalnego poboru podatków od biznesu.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
147--161
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 38 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Business Administration, East West University, Dhaka1212, Bangladesh
autor
- School of Business and Economics, United International University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh
autor
- School of Business and Economics, United International University, Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh
Bibliografia
- 1.Alkurdi, A., Mardini, G. H., (2020). The impact of ownership structure and the board of directors’ composition on tax avoidance strategies: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(4), 795-812.
- 2.Androniceanu, A., Gherghina, R. and Ciobănaşu, M., (2019). The interdependence between fiscal public policies and tax evasion. Administratie Si Management Public, 32, 32-41.
- 3.Austin, C. R., Wilson, R. J., (2017). An Examination of Reputational Costs and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Firms with Valuable Consumer Brands. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 39(1), 67-93.
- 4.Badertscher, B. A., Katz, S. P. and Rego, S. O., (2013). The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2), 228-250.
- 5.Barros, V., Sarmento, J. M., (2020). Board Meeting Attendance and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from the UK. Business Perspectives and Research, 8(1), 51-66.
- 6.Boussaidi, A., Hamed-Sidhom, M., (2021). Board’s characteristics, ownership’s nature and corporate tax aggressiveness: New evidence from the Tunisian context. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(4), 487-511.
- 7.Chen, J., (2001). Ownership Structure as Corporate Governance Mechanism: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Economics of Planning, 34(1), 53-72.
- 8.Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q. and Shevlin, T., (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61.
- 9.Cheng, C. S. A., Huang, H. H., Li, Y. and Stanfield, J., (2012). The Effect of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1493-1526.
- 10.Christensen, J., Murphy, R., (2004). The Social Irresponsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line. Development, 47(3), 37-44.
- 11.Chung, R., Firth, M. and Kim, J.-B., (2002). Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 29-48.
- 12.Desai, M. A., Dharmapala, D., (2008). Tax and Corporate Governance: An Economic Approach. In W. Schön (Ed.), Tax and Corporate Governance (pp. 13-30).
- 13.Desai, M. A., Dharmapala, D., (2009). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546.
- 14.Drake, K. D., Lusch, S. J. and Stekelberg, J., (2019). Does Tax Risk Affect Investor Valuation of Tax Avoidance? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(1), 151-176.
- 15.Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M. and Maydew, E. L., (2008). Long‐Run Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
- 16.Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. L. and Thornock, J. R., (2017). Changes in corporate effective tax rates over the past 25 years. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 441-463.
- 17.Frey, L., (2018). Tax certified individual auditors and effective tax rates. Business Research, 11(1), 77-114.
- 18.Hanlon, M., (2003). What can we infer about a firm’s taxable income from its financial statements? National Tax Journal, 56(4), 831-863.
- 19.Hanlon, M., Heitzman, S., (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127-178.
- 20.Hanlon, M., Slemrod, J., (2009). What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 126-141.
- 21.Hasan, I., Kim, I., Teng, H. and Wu, Q., (2022). The effect of foreign institutional ownership on corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100440.
- 22.Iswari, P., Sudaryono, E. A. and Widarjo, W., (2019). Political connection and tax aggressiveness: A study on the state-owned enterprises registered in Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of International Studies, 12(1).
- 23.Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H., (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- 24.Khan, M., Srinivasan, S. and Tan, L., (2016). Institutional Ownership and Corporate Tax Avoidance: New Evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 101-122.
- 25.Khurana, I. K., Moser, W. J., (2012). Institutional Shareholders’ Investment Horizons and Tax Avoidance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 35(1), 111-134.
- 26.Lanis, R., Richardson, G., (2015). Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 439-457.
- 27.Masum, M. H., Hena, S., (2017). Factors Influencing the Tax Payment in Developing Countries: A Comprehensive Study from the Listed Companies in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(15), 166-174.
- 28.Masum, M. H., Latiff, A. R. A. and Osman, M. N. H., (2020). Ownership Structure and Corporate Voluntary Disclosures in Transition Economy. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 601-611.
- 29.Phillips, J. D., (2003). Corporate Tax-Planning Effectiveness: The Role of CompensationBased Incentives. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 847-874.
- 30.Rahman, M. M., Masum, M. H., (2021). Extent of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Bangladesh. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 563-570.
- 31.Rego, S. O., (2003). Tax-Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805-833.
- 32.Rego, S. O., Wilson, R., (2012). Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775-810.
- 33.Richardson, G., Taylor, G. and Lanis, R., (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68-88.
- 34.Salihu, I. A., Annuar, H. A. and Sheikh Obid, S. N., (2015). Foreign investors’ interests and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(2), 138-147.
- 35.Ślusarczyk, B., (2018). Tax incentives as a main factor to attract foreign direct investments in Poland. Administratie Si Management Public, 30, 67-81.
- 36.Wang, F., Xu, S., Sun, J. and Cullinan, C. P., (2020). Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 793-811.
- 37.Wilson, R. J., (2009). An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999.
- 38.Ying, T., Wright, B. and Huang, W., (2017). Ownership structure and tax aggressiveness of Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(3), 313-332.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f7758ad6-0cd1-4470-af11-f732d9b04978