Effect of Soil Biostimulant Application on Protein and Carbohydrate Content in Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne L.)

• Autorzy: Zielewicz Waldemar , Wróbel Barbara , Stopa Wojciech , Paszkiewicz-Jasińska Anna , Szulc Piotr , Klarzyńska Agnieszka

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.53502/ORNK7518

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

One of the elements of modern plant fertilization systems is soil biostimulants. Like fertilizers, they provide plants with nutrients, and thanks to the content of additional substances (e.g. seaweed extracts, amino acids), plant development is affected. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of selected soil biostimulants and traditional P+K+Ca fertilization on changes in the content of crude protein (CP) and water soluble sugars (WSC) in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cv. Anna. The research was conducted over a two-year period at the Experimental Station of the Department of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences at the Agricultural Experimental Station of Poznan University of Life Sciences. The two-factor experiment was set up in a randomized block design with three replications. The first factor was fertilization with biostimulants (Physio-Mescal G18, PRP-SOL, EM-1 (Effective Microorganisms), EM-1+Ca) and standard mineral fertilizers (P+K+Ca). Nitrogen fertilization (0 and 200 kg·ha^-1) was applied as a second factor. The biomass of perennial ryegrass was evaluated for CP and WSC. The experiment showed that the application of Physio-Mescal G 18 and PRP-SOL, as well as EM-1+Ca, resulted in a significant increase in the CP and WSC content in perennial ryegrass compared to the control and the object fertilized with standard P+K+Ca fertilizers. Positive effects on the growth of the plant CP content were noted for two biostimulants: PRP-SOL and Physio Mescal G18. The ryegrass sward from the PRP-SOL-applied object contained 7% more CP compared to the control object, while that from the Physio Mescal G18 object contained 6% more. A very good effect of WSC accumulation was also obtained in the case of the sward from the PRP-SOL and Physio Mescal G18 treatments. In both cases, the determined WSC content was above 141 g⋅kg^-1 DM, a difference in content from the control of as much as 6%. In addition, nitrogen fertilization applied at the annual rate of 200 kg·ha^-1 significantly increased the CP content and decreased the WSC content, which worsened the CP/WSC ratio. The results of the two-year study showed that the incorporation of soil biostimulants, i.e. Physio-Mescal G 18 and PRP-SOL, into fertilizer practice makes it possible to obtain high-quality roughage for livestock.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

effective microorganisms; PRP SOL; Physio-Mescal G18; CP content; WSC content; CP/WSC ratio; mineral fertilization

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 68, nr 2
• Strony: 36--48
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Zielewicz Waldemar

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences, Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-8826

autor

Wróbel Barbara

• Institute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, Raszyn, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-5968

autor

Stopa Wojciech

• Institute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, Raszyn, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-387X

autor

Paszkiewicz-Jasińska Anna

• Institute of Technology and Life Sciences-National Research Institute, Falenty, Raszyn, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0650-3093

autor

Szulc Piotr

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-3231

autor

Klarzyńska Agnieszka

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences, Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-4721

Bibliografia

• [1] Purwin C., Stanek M., Lipiński K., Wierzbowska J., Nogalska A., Fijalkowska M.: Effect of a harvest time and cultivar on the chemical composition and in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Journal of Elementology, 2016, 21(3): 811-822. doi:10.5601/jelem.2015.20.4.1039.
• [2] Wróbel B., Zielewicz W., Paszkiewicz-Jasińska A., Spychalski B., Jakubowska Z.: Effect of harvest date on structural carbohydrates and lignin content in meadow sward in different pluvio-thermal conditions. Journal of Water and Land Development, 2022, 55: 1-7. doi: 10.24425/jwld.2022.142305.
• [3] Zielewicz W., Swędrzyński A., Dobrzyński J., Swędrzyńska D., Kulkova I., Wierzchowski P.S., Wróbel B.: Effect of Forage Plant Mixture and Biostimulants Application on the Yield. Changes of Botanical Composition, and Microbiological Soil Activity. Agronomy, 2021, 11(9): 1786. doi:10.3390/agronomy11091786.
• [4] Olszewska M. : Effects of cultivar, nitrogen rate and harvest time on the content of carbohydrates and protein in the biomass of perennial ryegrass. Agronomy, 2021, 11: 468. Doi: 10.3390/agronomy11030468.
• [5] Grzebisz W., Łukowiak R., Kotnis K. : Evaluation of nitrogen fertilization systems based on the in-season variability in the nitrogenous growth factor and soil fertility factors - a case of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), Agronomy, 2020, 10(11): 1701. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10111701.
• [6] Du Jardin P. : Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic, 2015, 196: 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
• [7] Abutova, R.J., Kozhakhmetov, M.K. : Humic preparation and plant activity. Journal of Water and Land Development, 2022, 55: 104–108. doi:10.24425/jwld.2022.142311.
• [8] Timac Agro Polska [online]. [Access 14.12.2022]. Available at: https://pl.timacagro.com/
• [9] Jakubus M. : Are Effective Microorganisms (EMTM) effective in enhancement of soil fertility? Zeszyty Naukowe. Inżynieria Środowiska/Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, 2015, 157(37): 80-93.
• [10] Zielewicz W., Swędrzyńska D., Swędrzyński A.: Wpływ zróżnicowanych dawek polepszacza glebowego Soleflor i nawozów mineralnych na skład botaniczny i plonowanie runi motylkowato-trawiastej (The effect of different doses of Soleflor soil improver and mineral fertilizers on botanical composition and yielding of grass-legume sward). Łąkarstwo w Polsce, 2015, 18: 267-279.
• [11] Olszewska M.: Effects of cultivar, nitrogen rate and biostimulant application on the chemical composition of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Biomass. Agronomy, 2022, 12(4): 826. doi:10.3390/agronomy12040826.
• [12] Truba M., Jankowski K., Wiśniewska-Kadżajan B., Malinowska E.: The effect of soil conditioners on the content of soluble carbohydrates, digestible protein and the carbohydrate-protein ratio in Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata. Environmental Protection and Natural Resources, 2018, 29: 1-8. doi: 10.2478/oszn-2018-0007.
• [13] Taweel H.Z., Tas T.B.M., Smit H.J., Elgersma A., Dijkstra J., Tamminga S. :Improving the quality of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) for dairy cows by selecting for fast clearing and/or degradable neutral detergent fiber. Livestock Production Science, 2005, 96: 239-248. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.02.002.
• [14] Dineen M., McCarthy B., Ross D., Ortega A., Dillon P., Van Amburgh M.E.: Characterization of the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) dominated pastures using updated chemical methods with application for the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2021, 272: 114752. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114752.
• [15] Nair R.: Developing tetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) populations. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2004, 47: 45-49.
• [16] Domański P.J.: Odmiany uprawne traw pastewnych i motylkowatych drobnonasiennych. W: Trawy i Rośliny Motylkowate (Cultivated varieties of forage grasses and legumes. In: Grasses and leguminous plants). Biznes-Press sp. z o.o. Specjalny dodatek Agro Serwis, 2005, 27-45.
• [17] Marcinek J., Komisarek J., Bednarek R., Mocek A., Skiba S., Wiatrowska K. : Polish soil classification. Soil Science Annual, 2011, 62(3): 1-193.
• [18] Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Robers P.A., Smith F.:. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytic Chemistry, 1956, 28(3): 350-356.
• [19] Brzóska F.: Systemy produkcji pasz dla bydła mlecznego, zbiór, konserwacja i żywienie krów (Dairy cattle feed production systems, harvesting, conservation and feeding of cows). Wieś Jutra, 2003, 4: 47–53.
• [20] Kucharski J., Jastrzębska E.: The role of soil land effective microorganisms (EM) in the management of microbiological properties of soil. Advances of Agricultural Sciences Problem Issues, 2005, 507: 22-315.
• [21] Okorski A., Majchrzak B.: Grzyby zasiedlające nasiona grochu siewnego po zastosowaniu preparatu mikrobiologicznego EM 1 (Fungi colonizing pea seeds after using of microbiological control product EM 1). Progress in Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, 2008, 48(4): 1314-1318.
• [22] Dos Santos L.F., Silva M.D.C.S., de Paula Lana R., Diogo N.V., Kasuya M.C.M., Ribeiro K.G.: Effective microorganisms: Microbial diversity and its effect on the growth of palisade grass. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 2020, 8(3): 177-186. doi: 10.17138/tgft(8)177-186.
• [23] Mayer J., Scheid S., Widmer F., Fließbach A., Oberholzer H. R. 2010. How effective are 'Effective microorganisms® (EM)'? Results from a field study in temperate climate. Applied Soil Ecology 46 (2): 230-239. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.08.007.
• [24] Krzywy E.: Ocena wpływu substancji czynnej PRP na kształtowanie żyzności i urodzajności gleb. W: Dla rolnictwa czystego i produktywnego (Evaluation of the effect of the PRP active substance on soil fertility and productivity. In: For pure and productive agriculture). PRP Polska, Warszawa, 2008, 31-32.
• [25] Sulewska H., Szymańska G., Pecio A.: Ocena efektów stosowania użyźniacza glebowego UGmax w uprawie kukurydzy na ziarno i kiszonkę (Evaluation of UGmax soil additive applied in maize grown for grain and silage). Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 54(4): 120-125.
• [26] Zielewicz W., Goliński P., Wróbel B., Swędrzyński A.: Wpływ stosowania nawozów mineralnych zawierających dodatki biologiczne na skład botaniczny, odżywienie azotem i plonowanie runi trawiastej (Effect of application of mineral fertilizers containing biological additives on botanical composition, nitrogen status and yield of grass sward). Fragmenta Agronomica, 2019, 36(1): 100-113.
• [27] Ihtisham M., Fahad S., Luo T., Larkin R.M., Yin S., Chen L.: Optimization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization rates for overseeded perennial ryegrass turfon dormant bermudagrass in a transitional climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 487. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00487.
• [28] Jankowska J.: Wpływ nawożenia azotem i fluroksypyru (Starane 250 EC) na zawartość białka ogólnego i węglowodanów rozpuszczalnych w sianie łąkowym (Effect of nitrogen fertilization and fluroxypyr (Starane 250 EC) on the total protein and soluble carbohydrates in hay meadow). Fragmenta Agronomica, 2014, 31(2): 18-25.
• [29] Schlegel P., Wyss U., Arrigo Y., Hess H.D.: Mineral concentrations of fresh herbage from mixed grassland as influenced by botanical composition, harvest time and growth stage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 219: 226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.022.
• [30] Chesney L., Scollan N., Gordon, A, McConnell, D.A., Lively, F.O.: Investigating the effect of nitrogen application level on grass production and quality under simulated grazing. Grassland Science in Europe 25: 55-57.
• [31] Edwards G.R., Parsons A.J., Rasmussen S., Bryant R.H. 2007. High sugar ryegrasses for livestock systems in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 2020, 69: 161-171.
• [32] Sosnowski J., Malinowska E., Jankowski K., Redzik P.: Morpho-chemical diversity in Festuca pratensis and Lolium perenne depending on concentrations of Ecklonia maxima extract. Appl. Ecol. Env. Res., 2016, 14: 369-379.
• [33] Trawczyński C., Bogdanowicz P.: Wykorzystanie użyźniacza glebowego w aspekcie ekologicznej uprawy ziemniaka. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 52(4): 9-97.
• [34] Sosnowski J., Jankowski K.: Wpływ użyźniacza glebowego na skład florystyczny i plonowanie mieszanek kostrzycy Brauna z koniczyną łąkową i lucerną mieszańcową. Łąkarstwo w Polsce, 2010, 13: 157-166.
• [35] Martyniuk S., Księżak J.: Ocena pseudomikrobiologicznych biopreparatów stosowanych w uprawie roślin. Polish Journal of Agronomy, 2011, 6: 27-33.
• [36] Sosnowski J.: Reaction of Dactylis glomerata L., Festuca pratensis Huds. and Lolium perenne L. to microbiological fertilizer and mineral fertilization. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric., 2012, 1(1): 8-91.
• [37] Dobrzyński J., Kulkova I., Wierzchowski P.S., Wróbel B.: Response of Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties to the Application of Effective Microorganisms in the Water of the Turawa Reservoir. Water, 2022, 14: 12. doi:10.3390/w14010012
• [38] Tomczyk P., Wierzchowski P.S., Dobrzyński J., Kulkova I., Wróbel B., Wiatkowski M., Kuriqi A., Skorulski W., Kabat T., Prycik M., Gruss Ł., Drobnik J.: Effective microorganism water treatment method for rapid eutrophic reservoir restoration. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2023, Dec 8. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-31354-2.
• [39] Ciszewski A., Jarosz Ł.S.; Kalinowski M., Marek A., Grądzki Z., Grabowski S., Hejdysz, M., Nowaczewski S., Rysiak A.: Influence of Effective Microorganisms and Clinoptilolite on Gut Barrier Function, Intestinal Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens during Induced Eimeria tenella Infection. Agriculture, 2022, 12: 2176. doi:10.3390/agriculture12122176
• [40] Reszka P., Cygan-Szczegielniak D., Jankowiak H., Cebulska A., Mikołajczak B., Bogucka J.: Effects of Effective Microorganisms on Meat Quality, Microstructure of the Longissimus Lumborum Muscle, and Electrophoretic Protein Separation in Pigs Fed on Different Diets. Animals, 2020, 10: 1755. doi:10.3390/ani10101755.