PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Pollution, Happiness and Willingness to Pay Taxes:The Value Effect of Public Environmental Policies

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Zanieczyszczenie, szczęście i chęć płacenia podatków: efekt wartości w ramach publicznych polityk ekologicznych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
As China’s economic development pattern is marked by an excessive consumption of fossil fuels, environmental pollution problems in China are getting increasingly serious and threatening residents’ fundamental demands for a high quality of life. It has become a handicap to sustainable economic development and social well-being. In this paper, the happiness index method were used, and models depicting the relationship between residents’ sense of happiness and environmental pollution factors and between the willingness to pay taxes and environmental pollution factors have been established. The results show that environmental pollution, especially air pollution, significantly affects the residents’ sense of happiness. To improve residential environment quality and reduce pollution, residents are willing to pay the relevant taxes. If pollution control is considered a public policy, there exists a substantive weight of government between residents’ income and environmental quality. This will influence the choice of environmental public policy.
PL
Rozwój ekonomiczny Chin powiązany jest z nadmiernym zużywaniem paliw kopalnych, a zanieczyszczenia środowiska osiągają poziom, który stanowi zagrożenie dla oczekiwanego przez obywateli wysokiego poziomu życia. Stało się to przeszkodą dla zrównoważonego rozwoju gospodarczego i dobrobytu społecznego. W niniejszym opracowaniu wykorzystano metodę wskaźnika szczęścia. Opracowano modele obrazujące związek między poczuciem szczęścia mieszkańców a zanieczyszczeniami środowiska oraz między chęcią płacenia podatków a czynnikami zanieczyszczenia środowiska. Wyniki pokazują, że zanieczyszczenie środowiska, w szczególności zanieczyszczenie powietrza, znacząco wpływa na poczucie szczęścia mieszkańców. Aby poprawić jakość środowiska mieszkańców i zmniejszyć zanieczyszczenie, obywatele są skłonni zapłacić odpowiednie podatki. Jeżeli kontrola zanieczyszczeń jest uważana za politykę publiczną, rząd odgrywa istotną rolę w kształtowaniu relacji między dochodami mieszkańców a jakością środowiska. Wpłynie to bowiem na wybór polityki publicznej dotyczącej środowiska.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
75--86
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 34 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 611130, Chengdu, China
autor
  • School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 611130,Chengdu, China
autor
  • School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 611130,Chengdu, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. ABEYGUNAWARDENA P., BARBA R., 2000, Emission tradable as a tool for environmental management, in: Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 3, p. 71-92.
  • 2. COASE R., 1960, The problem of social cost, in: Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, p. 1-44.
  • 3. EASTERLIN R.A., 1974, Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence, in: Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz, ed. David P. and Reder M., Academic Press, New York.
  • 4. FU M., HUANG Z.M., 2008, The kuznets relationship between economic development stages and environmental pollution in China, in: China Industrial Economics, vol. 6, p. 869-881.
  • 5. HONG L., ZHENXING X., 2017, The impact of ecological deficit tax and income tax cuts on economic growth: a CGE analysis in China, in: Economic Research Journal, vol. 7, p. 124-138.
  • 6. HONGYOU L., FEI T., WENLI X., 2017, Can tax policies enhance corporate’s environmental responsibility? Evidence from Chinese listed companies, in: Finance and Trade Research, vol.1, p. 85-91.
  • 7. HONGYOU L., YUNCHAN Z., 2017, Analysis on effects of China’s environmental tax and fee policies: a test based on three-dividend hypothesis, in: Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 17(4), p. 9-26.
  • 8. LEVINSON A., 2012, Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality, in: Journal of Public Economics vol. 96 (9-10), p. 869-881.
  • 9. LI Z.T., FOLMER H., XUE J.H., 2014, To what extent does air pollution affect happiness? The case of the Jinchuan mining area, China, in: Ecological Economics vol. 99, p. 88-99.
  • 10. LUECHINGER S., 2009, Valuing air quality using the life satisfaction approach, in: The Economic Journal, vol. 119 (536), p. 482-515.
  • 11. MACKERRON G., MOURATO S., 2009, Life satisfaction and air quality in London, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68 (5), p. 1441-1453.
  • 12. MENZ T., 2011, Do people habituate to air pollution? Evidence from international life satisfaction data, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 7(1), p. 211-219.
  • 13. MING S., LI X., WEN W., WENPO S., 2016, Some thoughts and policy recommendations on promoting the legislation of environmental protection tax, in: Public Finance Research, vol.1, p. 38-45.
  • 14. NEW ECONOMIC FOUNDATION, http:// www.neweconomics.org/gen/well-beingpower aspaspx. (1.01.2017).
  • 15. PIGOU A., 1932, The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan, London.
  • 16. PRAAG B.M.S., BAARSMA E.B., 2005, Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: the case of airport noise, in: The Economic Journal, vol. 115 (500), p. 224-246.
  • 17. PU L., SUJIN Z., 2016, Environment, life expectancy and economic development: the optimal environmental tax, in: Management Review, vol. 28(10), p. 39-49.
  • 18. REHDANZ K., MADDISON D., 2005, Climate and happiness, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 52 (1), p. 111125.
  • 19. REHDANZ K., MADDISON D., 2008, Local environmental quality and life satisfaction in Germany, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 64 (4), p. 787-789.
  • 20. RONG T.T., ZHAO Z., 2015, Research on urban residents’ green happiness and its influencing factors in Yangtze River Delta of China, in: International Journal of Business Manage-ment and Economics Research, vol. 2, p. 1-10.
  • 21. SHAN Y., 2016, Benefit measurement in the design of the design of the environmental protection tax law, in: Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Science), vol.235(3), p. 46-55.
  • 22. SHEN N., 2012, Environmental efficiency, industrial heterogeneity and intensity of optimal regulation-nonlinear test based on industrial panel-data, in: China Industrial Economics, vol. 3, p. 56-68.
  • 23. SMYTH R., MISHRA V., QIAN X., 2008, The environment and well-being in urban China, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68 (1-2), p. 547-555.
  • 24. SONG M.L., WANG S.H., 2013, Analysis of environmental regulation, technological pro-ression and economic growth from the perspective of statistical tests, in: Economic Research Journal, vol. 3, p. 122-134.
  • 25. STAVINS R.N., 1995, Transaction costs and tradable permits, in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 29, p. 133-148.
  • 26. TU Z.G., XIAO G., 2009, Research on China’s industrial development model under environmental strains, in: The Journal of World Economy, vol. 11, p. 41-54.
  • 27. QINGQUAN F., XIANHUA Z., TONGBIN Z., 2016, Externalities of dynamic environmental taxation, paths of accumulative pollution and long-term economic growth, in: Economic Research Journal, vol. 8, p. 116-128.
  • 28. WELSCH H., 2002, Preferences over prosperity and pollution: environmental valuation based on happiness surveys, in: Kyklos, vol. 55 (4), p. 473-494.
  • 29. WELSCH H., 2006, Environment and happiness: valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 58 (4), p. 801-813.
  • 30. WELSCH H., KUHLING J., 2009, Using happiness data for environmental valuation: issues and applications, in: Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 23 (2), p. 385-406.
  • 31. XIANGJU L., NA H., 2017, Analysis of influence of tax on environmental pollution based on fiscal decentralization, in: Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 17(6), p. 54-66.
  • 32. YE J., HUSEN A., 2017, Can environmental taxes effectively control air pollution, in: China Industrial Economics, vol. 5, p. 54-74.
  • 33. ZHANG H.F., ZHOU F., YANG H., GUO Q., 2009, Regulation performance of the win-win of environmental protection and economic development, in: Economic Research Journal, vol. 3, p. 14-26.
  • 34. ZHANG X.Y., ZHONG J.W., 2011, The conception of China’s carbon tax: connotation, effect and framework, in: Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), vol. 4, p. 92-101.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f607521f-67f2-4969-a598-4d1e75666bac
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.