Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The following research seeks to classify, analyze, and determine the barriers that affect the implementation of lean manufacturing from a socio-technical approach that allows organizations to understand how different socio-technical actors influence the results that could be obtained. The article contributes to the literature because it emphasizes the need to address a holistic social and technical approach to address barriers to implementing lean manufacturing. The research methodology is a critical literature review of the barriers to implementing lean manufacturing projects from a socio-technical perspective. The articles selected from the Scopus database were analyzed to understand the different relationships and interactions from a socio-technical perspective. The research emphasizes the importance of considering a sociotechnical vision in implementing lean manufacturing projects because it is a production system that integrates an organization's social and technical actors. The article contributes theoretically and practically by proposing a vision to address the barriers in the implementation process.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
155--162
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 65 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
autor
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Facultad de Ciencias y Ingeniería - Lima, Perú
Bibliografia
- 1.Aadithya, Asokan, Vinodh., 2021. Application of interpretive structural modelling for analysis of lean adoption barriers in heavy industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(2), 450-475. DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-07-2019-0083
- 2.Abu, F., Gholami, H., Saman, M. Z. M., Zakuan, N., Streimikiene, D., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., 2021a. An sem approach for the barrier analysis in lean implementation in manufacturing industries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su13041978
- 3.Abu, F., Gholami, H., Saman, M. Z. M., Zakuan, N., Streimikiene, D., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., 2021b. An sem approach for the barrier analysis in lean implementation in manufacturing industries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su13041978
- 4.Abu, F., Saman, M. Z. M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Gholami, H., Zakuan, N., 2022. Challenges in the implementation of lean manufacturing in the wood and furniture industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(1), 103-123. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-01-2021-0029
- 5.Arumugam, V., Kannabiran, G., Vinodh, S., 2020. Impact of technical and social lean practices on SMEs’ performance in automobile industry: a structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 1-27. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2020.1791067
- 6.Bashar, A., Hasin, A. A., Sakib, M. N., Bashar, N. B., 2024. Lean implementation barriers in the apparel industry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2022-0249
- 7.Baxter, G., Sommerville, I., 2011. Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
- 8.Ben Ruben, R., Nagapandi, P., Nachiappan, S., 2020. Modelling and analysis of barriers of lean sustainability in metal manufacturing organizations. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 6807-6812. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.980
- 9.Bhadu, J., Singh, D., Bhamu, J., 2022. Analysis of lean implementation barriers in Indian ceramic industries: modeling through an interpretive ranking process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3606-3635. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2020-0540
- 10.Bodin Danielsson, C., 2013. An explorative review of the Lean office concept. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(3-4), 167-180. DOI: 10.1108/JCRE-02-2013-0007
- 11.Bueno, A., Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, R., Guedes de Oliveira, T. L., Scavarda, L. F., Filho, M. G., Tortorella, G. L., 2023. Lean 4.0 implementation framework: Proposition using a multi-method research approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 264(July). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108988
- 12.Carayon, P., Hancock, P., Leveson, N., Noy, I., Sznelwar, L., van Hootegem, G., 2015. Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety - developing the conceptual framework. Ergonomics, 58(4), 548-564. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1015623
- 13.Carnwell, R., Daly, W., 2001. Strategies for the construction of a critical review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 1(2), 57-63. DOI: 10.1054/nepr.2001.0008
- 14.Chaudhuri, A., Jayaram, J., 2019. A socio-technical view of performance impact of integrated quality and sustainability strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 57(5), 1478-1496. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1492162
- 15.Chavez, R., Yu, W., Jacobs, M., Wong, C. Y., 2024. Does digitalization enhance the effects of lean production on social performance? International Journal of Operations and Production Management. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-05-2023-0332
- 16.Cherns, A., 1976. Principles of Socio-Technical Design. 1-16.
- 17.Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., Pinto, R., 2021. How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(3), 695-721. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135
- 18.Costa, F., Lispi, L., Staudacher, A. P., Rossini, M., Kundu, K., Cifone, F. D., 2019. How to foster Sustainable Continuous Improvement: A causeeffect relations map of Lean soft practices. Operations Research Perspectives, 6(December 2018), 100091. DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2018. 100091
- 19.Davies, R., Coole, T., Smith, A., 2017. Review of Socio-technical Considerations to Ensure Successful Implementation of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), 1288-1295. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg. 2017.07.256
- 20.EL-Khalil, R., Leffakis, Z. M., Hong, P. C., 2020. Impact of improvement tools on standardization and stability goal practices : An empirical examination of US automotive firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4), 705-723. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0289
- 21.Ferreira, D. M. C., Saurin, T. A., 2019. A complexity theory perspective of kaizen: a study in healthcare. Production Planning and Control, 30(16), 1337-1353. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1615649
- 22.Freitas, R. de C., Freitas, M. do C. D., Gomes de Menezes, G., Odorczyk, R. S., 2018. Lean Office contributions for organizational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(5), 1027-1039. DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-06-2017-0221
- 23.Gaikwad, S. K., Paul, A., Moktadir, M. A., Paul, S. K., Chowdhury, P., 2020. Analyzing barriers and strategies for implementing Lean Six Sigma in the context of Indian SMEs. Benchmarking, 27(8), 2365-2399. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0484
- 24.Gelaw, M. T., Azene, D. K., Berhan, E., 2024. Assessment of critical success factors, barriers and initiatives of total productive maintenance (TPM) in selected Ethiopian manufacturing industries. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 30(1), 51-80. DOI: 10.1108/JQME-11-2022-0073
- 25.Hariyani, D., Mishra, S., 2023. Barriers to the adoption of integrated sustainable-green-lean-six sigma-agile manufacturing system (ISGLSAMS): a literature review. Benchmarking, 30(9), 3590-3636. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0585
- 26.Jesson, J., Lacey, F., 2006. How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 139-148. DOI: 10.1080/15602210600616218
- 27.Kumar, K., Zindani, D., Davim, J. P., 2019. Socio-technical Considerations. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 43-51, Springer Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8165-2_5
- 28.Kunnen, Y. S., Roemeling, O. P., Smailhodzic, E., 2023. What are barriers and facilitators in sustaining lean management in healthcare? A qualitative literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09978-4
- 29.Liker, J. K., 2004. The 14 principles of the Toyota way: An executive summary of the culture behind TPS. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 290007864
- 30.Malik, M., Abdallah, S., 2020. The relationship between organizational attitude and lean practices: an organizational sense-making perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(9), 1715-1731. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0460
- 31.Minshull, L. K., Dehe, B., Kotcharin, S., 2022a. Exploring the impact of a sequential lean implementation within a micro-firm - A socio-technical perspective. Journal of Business Research, 151(June), 156-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.052
- 32.Minshull, L. K., Dehe, B., Kotcharin, S., 2022b. Exploring the impact of a sequential lean implementation within a micro-firm - A socio-technical perspective. Journal of Business Research, 151(July), 156-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.052
- 33.Nakano, D., Muniz, J., 2018. Writing the literature review for empirical papers. Production, 28. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6513.20170086
- 34.Oborski, P., 2003. Social-technical aspects in modern manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 22(11- 12), 848-854. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1573-6
- 35.Patnayakuni, R., Ruppel, C. P., 2010. A socio-technical approach to improving the systems development process. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(2), 219-234. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-008-9093-4
- 36.Prida, B., Grijalvo, M., 2008. The socio-technical approach to work organisation. An essential element in Quality Management Systems. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 19(4), 343-352. DOI: 10.1080/14783360701594568
- 37.Qureshi, K. M., Mewada, B. G., Alghamdi, S. Y., Almakayeel, N., Mansour, M., Qureshi, M. R. N., 2022. Exploring the Lean Implementation Barriers in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Interpretive Structure Modeling and Interpretive Ranking Process. Applied System Innovation, 5(4), 1-20. DOI: 10.3390/asi5040084
- 38.Raja, M. I., 2011. Lean manufacturing---an integrated socio-technical systems approach to work design. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, May, 253. http://search.proquest.com/docview/871192904?accountid=14549%5Cn http://hl5yy6xn2p.search.serialssolutions.com/?genre=article&sid=ProQ :&atitle=Lean+manufacturing--an+integrated+sociotechnical+systems+approach+to+work+design&title=Lean+manufacturi ng---an+
- 39.Righi, A. W., Saurin, T. A., 2015. Complex socio-technical systems: Characterization and management guidelines. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.003
- 40.Saini, S., Singh, D., 2022. Reckoning with the barriers to Lean implementation in d. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(3), 683-712. DOI: 10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0032
- 41.Sakthi Nagaraj, T., Jeyapaul, R., 2021. An empirical investigation on association between human factors, ergonomics and lean manufacturing. Production Planning and Control, 32(16), 1337-1351. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1810815
- 42.Salonitis, K., Tsinopoulos, C., 2016. Drivers and Barriers of Lean Implementation in the Greek Manufacturing Sector. Procedia CIRP, 57, 189-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.033
- 43.Sangwan, K. S., Bhamu, J., Mehta, D., 2014. Development of lean manufacturing implementation drivers for Indian ceramic industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(5), 569-587. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0105
- 44.Saurin, T. A., Gonzalez, S. S., 2013. Assessing the compatibility of the management of standardized procedures with the complexity of a sociotechnical system: Case study of a control room in an oil refinery. Applied Ergonomics, 44(5), 811-823. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo. 2013.02.003
- 45.Saurin, T. A., Luz Tortorella, G., Soliman, M., Garza-Reyes, J. A., 2021. Lean production myths: an exploratory study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-08-2020-0302
- 46.Saurin, T. A., Rooke, J., Koskela, L., 2013a. A complex systems theory perspective of lean production. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5824-5838. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.796420
- 47.Saurin, T. A., Rooke, J., Koskela, L., 2013b. A complex systems theory perspective of lean production. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5824-5838. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.796420
- 48.Schöttl, F., Lindemann, U., 2015. Quantifying the complexity of sociotechnical systems-A generic, interdisciplinary approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44(C), 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.019
- 49.Sindhwani, R., Mittal, V. K., Singh, P. L., Aggarwal, A., Gautam, N., 2019. Modelling and analysis of barriers affecting the implementation of lean green agile manufacturing system (LGAMS). Benchmarking, 26(2), 498-529. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2017-0245
- 50.Singh, R. K., Kumar Mangla, S., Bhatia, M. S., Luthra, S., 2022. Integration of green and lean practices for sustainable business management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 353-370. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2897
- 51.Soliman, M., Saurin, T. A., 2022. Lean-as-imagined differs from lean-asdone: the influence of complexity. Production Planning and Control, 33(11), 1097-1114. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1843729
- 52.Soliman, M., Saurin, T. A., Anzanello, M. J., 2018. The impacts of lean production on the complexity of socio-technical systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 197(August 2017), 342-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.024
- 53.Sony, M., Naik, S., 2020. Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model. Technology in Society, 61(March), 101248. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc. 2020.101248
- 54.Tortorella, G. L., Fettermann, D. C., Piñeres, A., Gaiardelli, P., 2019. The moderating role of just-in-time on sociotechnical practices’ effect over quality and workers’ health. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 29(3), 210-223. DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20776
- 55.Tortorella, G. L., Vergara, L. G. L., Ferreira, E. P., 2017. Lean manufacturing implementation: an assessment method with regards to socio-technical and ergonomics practices adoption. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 89(9-12), 3407-3418. DOI: 10.1007/s 00170-016-9227-7
- 56.Trist, E., 1981. The Evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and action research program. In Toronto, 2, 1-67. DOI: 0- 7743-6286-3
- 57.Vanichchinchai, A., 2022. The effects of the Toyota Way on agile manufacturing: an empirical analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(8), 1450-1472. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2022-0053
- 58.Vinodh, S., Shimray, S. A., 2023. Analysis of barriers for implementation of integrated Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 using interpretive ranking process. TQM Journal, 35(7), 1761-1776. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-04-2022-0121
- 59.Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Huisingh, D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., Liu, Y., 2020. Development of a lean manufacturing framework to enhance its adoption within manufacturing companies in developing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118726. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118726
- 60.Yadav, G., Seth, D., Desai, T. N., 2018. Prioritising solutions for Lean Six Sigma adoption barriers through fuzzy AHP-modified TOPSIS framework. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(3), 270-300. DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2016-0023
- 61.Yadav, O. P., Nepal, B. P., Rahaman, M. M., Lal, V., 2017a. Lean Implementation and Organizational Transformation: A Literature Review. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 29(1), 2-16. DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2016.1263914
- 62.Yadav, O. P., Nepal, B. P., Rahaman, M. M., Lal, V., 2017b. Lean Implementation and Organizational Transformation: A Literature Review. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 29(1), 2-16. DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2016.1263914
- 63.Yadav, V., Jain, R., Mittal, M. L., Panwar, A., Sharma, M. K., 2019. An appraisal on barriers to implement lean in SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 195-212. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2017-0262
- 64.Zhang, L., Narkhede, B. E., Chaple, A. P., 2017. Evaluating lean manufacturing barriers: An interpretive process. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1086-1114. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-04-2017-0071
- 65.Zulfiqar, M., Sony, M., Bhat, S., Antony, J., Salentijn, W., McDermott, O., 2023. Unlocking the potential: empirical analysis of enablers, barriers, benefits and technologies for integrating Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma in manufacturing organisations. TQM Journal. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-05-2023-0130
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f5e4bcd9-5aa9-4bf3-9d53-7b4054d0d679
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.