A participatory approach to public space design as informative for place-making

• Autorzy: Strydom W. , Puren K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Place-making is an empowering process that takes community involvement as point of departure. In South Africa, the planning and design of urban space was previously based on top-down, bureaucratic planning practices that excluded communities from decisionmaking about their neighbourhoods. Together with this, Apartheid policy enforced separate development based on racial grounds, which resulted in communities being relocated to characterless landscapes with limited open spaces. Open spaces are important in low-income high density residential environments as they are prominent public places that form the heart of communities’ social lives. This article reports on the first phase of an on-going research project initiated by Urban and Regional planning at the North-West University, South Africa, that seeks to empower communities to transform local open spaces to vibrant public places. This particular study’s aim was to explore how community involvement can inform the process of place-making. The research was conducted in Ikageng, Potchefstroom, South Africa where the community identified a lack of quality open spaces as a major concern. A qualitative participatory research approach was followed, which included on-site focus group discussions with participants living around an existing open space. Community participation informed place-making in at least two ways: by creating an understanding of the sociospatial dimensions that underlie space and by formulating suggested intervention strategies to address the needs and desires of the community. Suggested interventions include (i) physical interventions (upgrade and beautification of the space), (ii) social interventions (ongoing community involvement) and (iii) economic interventions (creating employment opportunities).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

open spaces; placemaking; public place; participatory approach

• Wydawca: Foundation for Young Scientists
• Czasopismo: Challenges of Modern Technology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 4, no. 4
• Strony: 33--40
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab., fot.

Twórcy

autor

Strydom W.

• Urban and Regional Planning, School for Geo and Spatial Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

autor

Puren K.

• Urban and Regional Planning, School for Geo and Spatial Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Bibliografia

• [1] Ababio, E. (2007). Marriage for development: ward committees as partners in participatory democracy. Journal of Public Administration, 42(7):614-621.
• [2] Al-Bishawi, M. & Ghadban, S.S. (2011). A methodological approach for reading urban open space. ArchNet-IJAR, 5(1):73-85.
• [3] Alexander, E. (2008). Public participation in planning – a multidimensional model: the case of Israel. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(1):57-80.
• [4] Allwood, C. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1417-1429
• [5] Andrews, J.O., Newman, S.D., Meadows, O., Cox, M.J. & Bunting, S. (2012). Partnership readiness for community-based participatory research. Health education research, 27 (4): 555-571.
• [6] Bank, L.J. (2011). Home Spaces, Street Styles: Contesting Power and Identity in a South African City. Pluto Press and Wits University Press.
• [7] Basheka, B.C. & Mubangizi, B.C. 2012. Citizen-driven approaches in fighting corruption: A comparative analysis of Uganda’s and South Africa’s local government systems. Journal of Public Administration, 47(3):636 -655.
• [8] Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for social sciences, 6th edition. Pearson Education, Inc. pp. 19-49
• [9] Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching.
• [10] Butin, D. W. (2006). The limits of service learning in higher education. The review of higher education, 29(4): 473-498.
• [11] Cash, C. & Swatuk, L. (2011). Integrated development planning in South Africa: Lessons from the Dwars River Valley. Urban forum, 22(1):53-73.
• [12] Cho, S., Lambert, D., Kim, S., Roberts, R. & Park, W. (2011). Relationship between value of open space and distance from housing locations within a community. Journal of geographical systems, 13(4):393-414.
• [13] Chinn, P. & Kramer, M. (1999). Theory and Nursing a Systematic Approach. St Louis: Mosby.
• [14] CSIR. (2005). Guidelines for Human Settlement Planning and Design (The Red Book). Pretoria: CSIR
• [15] Dewar, D. & Uytenbogaardt, R.S. (1991). South African Cities: A manifesto for change. Urban problems research unit, University of Cape Town. pp. 1-133
• [16] Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: Considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public understand. sci., 5, pp. 183-204.
• [17] Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• [18] Gomm, R. (2004). Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction. London: Palgrave.
• [19] Grønkjær, M., Curtis, T., de Crespigny, C. & Delmar, C. (2011). Analysing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator. Qualitative Studies, 2(1):16-30.
• [20] Heald, S. (2008). Embracing marginality: place-making vs development in Gardenton, Manitoba. Development in Practice, 18(1), 17-29.
• [21] Holmes, B. (2011). Citizens' engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Department of parliamentary services, australia, 1.
• [22] Jordaan, T., Puren, K. & Roos, V. (2008). The Meaning of Place-Making in Planning: Historical Overview and Implications for Urban and Regional Planning: Review Article. Acta Structilia: Journal for the Physical and Development Sciences, 15 (1) 91-117.
• [23] Lipietz, B. (2008). Building a vision for the post-apartheid city: What role for participation in Johannesburg’s city development strategy? International journal of urban & regional research, 32(1):135-163.
• [24] Maharaj, B. (1997). Apartheid, urban segregation, and the local state: Durban and the Group Areas Act in South Africa. Urban Geography, 18(2), 135-154.
• [25] Moor, M. & Rowland, J. (2006). Urban Design Futures. New York: Routledge.
• [26] Mzimakwe, T. (2010). Public participation and engagement in local governance: a South African perspective. Journal of Public Administration, 45(4):501-519.
• [27] Neuman, W.L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• [28] Nzimakwe, T.I. & Reddy, P.S. (2008).Community participation in eThekwini municipality with particular reference to ward committees. Journal of Public Administration, 43(4):667-679.
• [29] Raper, P.E. (1989). Dictionary of South African place names .2nd edition ed. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.
• [30] Reason, P. & Bradbury, H., eds. (2006). Handbook of action research. 1st edition ed. London: Sage publications.
• [31] Reuther, S. & Dewar, N.(2006). Competition for the use of public open space in low-income urban areas: The economic potential of urban gardening in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. Development Southern Africa, 23(1) p-p.
• [32] Robinson, D. (2011). Modernism at a crossroad: The Spadina expressway controversy in Toronto, Ontario ca. 1960-1971. Canadian historical review, 92(2):295-322.
• [33] Rodriguez K.L., Schwartz J.L., Lahman M.K.E. and Geist, M.R. (2011). Culturally responsive focus groups: Reframing the research experience to focus on participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (4):400-417.
• [34] Schneekloth, L.H. & Shibley, R.G. (1995). Place-making: The art and practice of building communities. 1st ed. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• [35] Schofield, J. & Szymanski, R. (2011). Sense of place in a chan ging world. In Schofield, J. & Szymanski, R. (eds.). Local heritage, global context: cultural perspectives on sense of place. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. pp. 1-11.
• [36] Shulman, L. (2004). Teaching as community property. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass..
• [37] Sinwell, L. (2011). Rethinking South Africa’s transition: From transformative to mainstream approaches to participatory development. African studies, 70(3):359-375.
• [38] Siyongwana, P. & Mayekiso, T. (2011). Local community and stakeholder participation in post-apartheid urban renewal development projects in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Africa insight, 41(3):142-156.
• [39] South Africa. (1998). Local Government: Municipal Structures Act No. 117 of 1998. Pretoria: Government Press.
• [40] South African Presidency.n.a. Growth and Development Summits: guidelines for district and metropolitan municipalities. http://www.thepresidency.gov.za/docs/pcsa/planning/gdsguidelines.pdf. Date of access: 31 May 2013.
• [41] Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11):2259-2275.
• [42] Theron, F. & Muyonjo, F. (2002). Addressing social exclusion: The Bloekombos case. Journal of Public Administration, 37(4), pp. 492-506.
• [43] Tuan, Y. (1979). Space and place: A humanistic perspective. Springer publications. 40