Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Introduction. The majority of industrial accidents occur because of human errors. Human error has different causes, however, in all cases cognitive abilities and limitations of human play an important role. Occupational cognitive failures are cognitively-based human errors that occur at work. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between occupational cognitive failures and safety consequences. Method. Personnel of a large industrial company in Iran filled out an occupational cognitive failure questionnaire (OCFQ) and answered questions on accidents. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to determine the relationship between cognitive failures and safety consequences. Results. According to developed regression models, personnel with a high rate of cognitive failure, in comparison to low rate, have a high risk of minor injury involvement (OR 5.1, 95% CI [2.62, 10.3]); similar results were for major injury and near miss. Discussion. The results of this study revealed usefulness of the OCFQ as a tool of predicting safetyrelated consequences and planning preventive actions.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
175--180
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Department of Occupational Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
autor
- Department of Occupational Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
autor
- Department of Occupational Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
autor
- Department of Occupational Health, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Bibliografia
- 1.Perkins AM, Corr PJ. Cognitive ability as a buffer to neuroticism: Churchill’s secret weapon? Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40(1):39–51.
- 2.Hansen C.P. Personality characteristics of the accident involved employee. J Bus Psychol. 1988;2(4):346–65.
- 3.Hansen C.P. A causal model of the relationship among accidents, biodata, personality, and cognitive factors. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74(1):81–90.
- 4.Postlethwaite B, Robbins S, Rickerson J, McKinniss T. The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2009;47(7):711–6.
- 5.Dilchert S, Ones DS, Davis RD, Rostow CD. Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive workplace behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(3):616–27.
- 6.Allahyari T, Rangi NH, Khosravi Y, Zayeri F. Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating of cognitive failures at work. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene. 2011;3(1):6–11. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from: http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/_/18471.pdf.
- 7.Arthur W, Barrett GV, Alexander RA. Prediction of vehicular accident involvement: a meta-analysis. Hum Perform. 1991;4(2):89–105.
- 8.Larson GE, Merritt CR. Can accidents be predicted? An empirical test of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Applied Psychology. 1991;40(1):37–45.
- 9.O’Hare D, Wiggins M, Batt R, Morrison D. Cognitive failure analysis for aircraft accident investigation. Ergonomics 1994;37(11):1855–69.
- 10.Larson GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, Underhill E. Further evidence of dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Br J Psychol. 1997;88(1):29–38.
- 11.Wallace JC, Chen G. Development and validation of a work-specific measure of cognitive failure: implications for occupational safety. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2005;78(4):615–32.
- 12.Wadsworth EJ, Simpson SA, Moss SC, Smith AP. The Bristol stress and health study: accidents, minor injuries and cognitive failures at work. Occup Med (Lond.). 2003;53(6):392–7.
- 13.Wallace JC, Vodanovich SJ. Can accidents and industrial mishaps be predicted? Further investigation into the relationship between cognitive failure and reports of accidents. J Bus Psychol. 2003;17(4):503–14.
- 14.Wickens CM, Toplak ME, Wiesenthal DL. Cognitive failures as predictors of driving errors, lapses, and violations. Accid Anal and Prev. 2008;40(3):1223–33.
- 15.Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on micro accidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(4):587–96.
- 16.Barach P, Small SD, Kaplan H. Designing a confidential safety reporting system: in depth review of thirty major medical incident reporting systems, and near-miss safety reporting systems in the nuclear, aviation, and petrochemical industries. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91:A1209.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f5bb6717-4084-4e0a-bf9b-5c2693b9071e