PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Using Triaxial Tests to Determine the Shearing Strength of Geogrid-Reinforced Sand

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Geogrids are widely used in civil engineering projects to reinforce road and railway structures. This paper presents research on the shearing strength of soil samples that have been reinforced with geogrids. The relationship between soil and geogrids is explored and evaluated by modeling the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials. For the purposes of this research, data obtained from tests of unreinforced sand samples with triaxial cells were compared with the data obtained from tests of reinforced sand samples. It was found that the shearing strength for reinforced samples was higher (from 9% to 49%) compared to unreinforced samples. Some damage to the geogrid was detected during the experiment, and for this reason, the same tests were numerically simulated for both unreinforced samples and samples reinforced with geogrids. Numerical simulations revealed the main reasons for damage to the geogrids during triaxial testing.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Strony
341--354
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys., tab
Twórcy
  • Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Geotechnics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Geotechnics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Geotechnics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
Bibliografia
  • [1] Abdi A., Abbeche K., Athmania D., Bouassida M. (2019) Effective Width Rule in the Analysis of Footing on Reinforced Sand Slope. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. Vol. 41, No. 1, 42–55.
  • [2] Nagy A.C., Moldovan D.-V., Ciotlaus M., Muntean L.E. (2017) Evaluation of Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Triaxial Geogrid Reinforcement on the Strength of Road Structures. Procedia Engineering. 181, 472–479.
  • [3] Li C., Ashlok J.C., White D.J, Vennapusa P.K.R. (2017) Mechanistic-based comparisons of stabilised base and granular surface layers of low-volume roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. Vol. 20, No. 1, 112-124.
  • [4] Denine S., Della N., Dlawar M. R., Sadok F., Canou J., Dupla J.-C. (2016) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on shear strength of sandy soil. Laboratory study. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. Vol. 38, No. 4, 3–13.
  • [5] Guidelines to use geosynthetics for the roads ground works MN GEOSINT ŽD 13, 2013 [in Lithuanian].
  • [6] Vaitkus A., Šiukščius A., Ramunas V. (2014) Regulations for use of geosynthetics for road embankments and subgrades. The Baltic journal of road and bridge engineering. Vol. 9, No. 2, 88–93.
  • [7] Recommendations for design and analysis of earth structures using geosynthetic reinforcements – EBGEO, Translation of the 2nd German Edition, Published by the German Geotechnical Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Geotechnik e.V., DGGT), 2011.
  • [8] Šiukščius A., Vorobjovas V., Vaitkus, A. (2017) Geogrid reinforced subgrade influence to ensure paved road durability. 10th International conference, “Environmental Engineering“, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania. Vilnius: VGTU Press 2017, 1–7.
  • [9] Nair A. M., Latha G. M. (2014) Large Diameter Triaxial Tests on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Subbases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. Vol. 27, No. 4.
  • [10] Sakleshpur V.A., Prezzi M., Salgado R., Siddiki N., Choi Y. S. (2019) Large-Scale Direct Shear Testing of Geogrid-Reinforced Aggregate Base over Weak Subgrade. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. Vol. 20, No. 6, 649–658.
  • [11] Makkar F.M., Chandrakaran S., Sankar N. (2019) Performance of 3-D geogrid-reinforced sand under direct shear mode. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 13, No. 3.
  • [12] Yang K.-H., Nguyen M.D., Yalew W.M., Liu C.-N., and Gupta R. (2016) Behavior of Geotextile-Reinforced Clay in Consolidated- Undrained Tests: Reinterpretation of Porewater Pressure Parameters. Journal of GeoEngineering. Vol. 11, No. 2, 45–57.
  • [13] Da Costa A., Castro J., Sagaseta C., Cañizal J. (2017) Influence of geotextile encasement in triaxial tests on gravel. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul 2017.
  • [14] Rezvani R. (2019) Shearing response of geotextile-reinforced calcareous soils using monotonic triaxial tests. Marine Georesources&Geotechnology.
  • [15] Goodarzi S., Shahnazari H. 2019. Strength enhancement of geotextile-reinforced carbonate sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. Vol. 47, No. 2, 128–139.
  • [16] Amšiejus J., Kačianauskas R., Norkus A., Tumonis L. (2010) Investigation of the sand porosity via oedometer testing. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering. Vol. 5, No 3, 139–147.
  • [17] Skuodis,Š., Markauskas D., Norkus A., Žaržojus G., Dirgėliene N. (2014) Testing and numerical simulation of Holocene marine sand uniaxial compression at Lithuanian coast. Baltica. Vol. 27, No. 1, 33–44.
  • [18] ISO 14688-1:2017. Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Identification and Classification of Soil – part 1: Identification and Description. International Organization for Standardization.
  • [19] Ojuri O.O., Agbolade O.C. (2015) Improvement of engineering properties of Igbokoda standard sand with shredded polyethylene wastes. Nigeria Journal of Technology. Vol. 34, No. 3, 443–451.
  • [20] Danesh A., Palassi M., Mirhasemi A.A. (2017) Evaluating the influence of ballast degradation on its shear behaviour. International Journal of Rail Transportation. Vol. 6, No. 3, 145–162.
  • [21] Sweta K., Hussaini S.K.K. (2018) Effect of shearing rate on the behavior of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast under direct shear conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. Vol. 46, No 3, 251–256.
  • [22] Infante D.J.U., Martinez G.M.A., Arrua P.A., Eberhardt M. (2016) Shear strength behaviour of different geosynthetic reinforced soil structure from direct shear test. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. Vol. 2, No. 17, 1–17.
  • [23] Han B., Ling J., Shu X., Gong H., Huang B. (2018) Laboratory investigation of particle size effects on the shear behaviour of aggregate-geogrid interface. Construction and Building Materials. 158, 1015–1025.
  • [24] Gao G., Meguid M.A. (2018) Effect of particle shape on the response of geogrid-reinforced systems: Insights from 3D discrete element analysis. Geotextiles and Geomembranes. Vol. 43, No. 6, 685–698.
  • [25] Vaitkus A., Čygas D., Laurinavičius A. (2010) Use of geosynthetics for the strengthening of road pavement structure in Lithuania. Geosynthetics for a challenging world: 9th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Guaruja, Brazil, 2010, Vol. 3. San Paulo: Brazilian Chapter of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS-Brazil), 1575–1580.
  • [26] Peric D., Su S. (2005) Influence of the end friction on the response of triaxial and plane strain clay samples. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, 12–16 September 2005, 571–574.
  • [27] ISO/TS 17892-9:2004. Geotechnical investigation and testing. Laboratory testing of soil. Part 9: Consolidated triaxial compression tests on water-saturated soils.
  • [28] Kamel M.A., Chandra S. (2004) Behaviour of subgrade soil reinforced with geogrid. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. Vol. 5, No. 4, 201–209.
  • [29] Tang H., Zhang X., Ji S. (2017) Discrete element analysis for shear band modes of granular materials in triaxial tests. Particulate Science and Technology. Vol. 35, No. 3, 277–290.
  • [30] Wang H., Koseki J., Sato T. (2017) p-Constant Condition Applied to Undrained Cyclic Triaxial Test of Unsaturated Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal. Vol. 40, No. 4, 710–718.
  • [31] Yang Z.X., Pan K. (2017) Flow deformation and cyclic resistance of saturated loose sand considering initial static shear effect. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 92, 68–78.
  • [32] Medzvieckas J., Dirgeliene N., Skuodis Š. (2017) Stress-strain states differences in specimens during triaxial compression and direct shear tests. Procedia Engineering. Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2016. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd. 172 (2017): 739–745.
  • [33] Skuodis Š., Dirgėlienė N. (2018) Investigations of soil shear strength reinforced with geogrids, Geologija, Geografija. Vol. 4, No. 2, 59–68 [in Lithuanian].
  • [34] Strzelecki T., Uciechowska-Grakowicz A., Strzelecki M., Sawicki E., Maniecki Ł. (2018) Numerical 3D simulations of seepage and the seepage stability of the right-bank dam of the Dry Flood Control Reservoir in Racibórz. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. Vol. 40, No 1, 11–20.
  • [35] Brinkgreve R.B.J., AL-Khoury R., Bakker K.J., Bonnier P.G., Brand P.J.W., and Broere W. 2007. PLAXIS 3D Foundation. General Information. Delft University of Technology & PLAXIS bv, The Netherlands.
  • [36] Bolton M.D. 1986. The Strength and Dilatancy of Sands. Geotechnique. Vol. 36, No. 1, 65–78.
  • [37] Iwamoto S., Yamamoto S., Lee S-H., Ito H., Endo, T. 2014. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced with Lignocellulose Nanofibers Dried in Melted Ethylene-Butene Copolymer. Materials, 7, 6919–6929.
  • [38] Fu S.-Y., Lauke B., Mai Y.-W. Science and Engineering of Short Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites. 2009. CRC Press Boca Raton USA.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f592edb4-255d-48af-9fc4-2e7b2cb818b7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.