Wdrażanie procedur lockout/tagout w systemach produkcyjnych Przemysłu 4.0

Dźwiarek, Marek

doi:10.2478/jok-2022-0028

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Wdrażanie procedur lockout/tagout w systemach produkcyjnych Przemysłu 4.0

Autorzy

Dźwiarek Marek

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/jok-2022-0028

Warianty tytułu

Application of lockout/tagout procedures in production systems of Industry 4.0

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Celem badań było opracowanie wytycznych i materiałów szkoleniowych wspomagających wdrażanie procedur LOTO w przemyśle 4.0. Przeprowadzone analizy systemów wytwórczych Przemysłu 4.0 wykazały, że wymagania dotyczące procedur LOTO różnią się od procedur stosowanych w systemach klasycznych. Opracowane wytyczne i materiały szkoleniowe zostały zweryfikowane podczas szkolenia pilotażowego. Średnia wartość liczby punktów w skali Likerta przekracza 4,4 wskaźnik I-CVI przeważnie przyjmuje wartość 1, a najmniejsza jego wartość to 0,86. Analiza statystyczna z wykorzystaniem testu t – studenta potwierdziła, że wytyczne i materiały szkoleniowe mają doskonałą trafność merytoryczną na poziomie ufności 0,05. Dotyczy to ich zawartości, użyteczności oraz kompleksowości i kompletności.

The aim of the research was to develop guidelines and training materials to support the implementation of LOTO procedures in Industry 4.0. The analysis of manufacturing systems of Industry 4.0 showed that the requirements for LOTO procedures differ from those used in classical systems. The developed guidelines and training materials were verified during the pilot training. The mean value of the Likert scale score exceeds 4.4. The I-CVI index is mostly 1 and the lowest value is 0.86. Statistical analysis using Student's t-test confirmed that the guidelines and training materials have excellent content validity at the 0.05 confidence level. This applies to their content, usefulness, comprehensiveness and completeness.

Słowa kluczowe

bezpieczeństwo maszyn Przemysł 4.0 LOTO

safety of machinery Industry 4.0 LOTO

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych

Czasopismo

Journal of KONBiN

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 52, iss. 3

Strony

137--148

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Dźwiarek Marek

Central Institute for Labour Protection (Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy – PIB)

Bibliografia

1. Abersfelder, S., Heyder, A., Franke, J. Optimization of a servo motor manufacturing value stream by use of ‘Industrie 4.0’. In: 2015 5th International Conference on Electric Drives Production, EDPC 2015 – Proceedings 7323216.
2. Alan C. Elliott, Wayne A. Woodward. Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook. With SPSS examples. (2007) DOI: 10.4135/9781412985949.
3. Albers A., Gladysz B., Pinner T., Butenko V., Stürmlinger T. Procedure for defining the system of objectives in the initial phase of an Industry 4.0 project focusing on intelligent quality control systems, Procedia CIRP 52 (2016) 262–267.
4. Badiane, A., Nadeau, S., Kenné, J.P., Polotski,V. Optimizing production while reducing machinery Lockout/Tagout circumvention possibilities. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(2), 2014: pp.188-201.
5. Badri, A., Boudreau-Trudel, B., Saâdeddine Souissi, A. Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? Safety Science 109 (2018) 403–411.
6. Brettel, M., Klein, M., Friederichsen, N. The relevance of manufacturing flexibility in the context of Industrie 4.0. In: 48th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, 2016. Procedia CIRP 41. pp. 105–110.
7. Bücker, I., Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B. Towards a methodology for Industrie 4.0 transformation. Lect. Notes Business Inform. Process. 2017. 255, 209–221.
8. Bulzacchelli, M.T., Vernick, J.S., Sorock, G.S., Webster, D.W., Lees, P.S.J. Circumstances of fatal Lockout/Tagout-related injuries in manufacturing. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51, 2008, pp. 728-734.
9. Campbell, T. LOTO remains problematic. Professional Safety, Vol 48(3), 2003: pp. 48-51.
10. Consortium II. Fact Sheet, 2013. Dostępne z: http://www.iiconsortium.org/ docs/IIC_ FACT _ SHEET.pdf.
11. Dewi, L., Zebua, E. Investigation of Lockout/Tagout procedure failure in machine maintenance process. Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2018: 135 – 140. DOI: 10.9744/jti.20.2.135-140.
12. Drath R., Horch A. Industrie 4.0: hit or hype?, IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 8 (2) (2014) 56–58.
13. Dźwiarek, M. “Real Time Location Systems for monitoring safety of the machine operators”. Safety of Industrial Automated Systems 2015. 18-20.11. 2015, Königswinter, Niemcy. ISBN 987-3-86423-163-6. s.. 153 – 156.
14. Dźwiarek, M., Łempiński T., Światowski. M. “Effectiveness investigation of the correlation algorithms applied in a Smart ID Card system to monitor the use of PPE”. in: Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World. Stein Haugen at. All (eds.) © Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-351-17466-4, (2018): s.1965 – 1971.
15. Dźwiarek, M., Strawiński, T., Łempiński, T., Światowski, M. „The simulation of the use of personal protective equipment in investigation of Smart ID Card system efficiency”, Journal of KONBIN. 43 (2017): s. 163 – 178, DOI 10.1515/jok-2017-0045.
16. Hermann M., Pentek T., Otto B. Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios, A Literature Review, in: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, (2016), pp. 3928–3937.
17. Kagermann H., Wahlster W., Helbig J. Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0, (2013). Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group.
18. Kaivo-Oja, J., Virtanen, P., Jalonen, H., Stenvall, J. “The effects of the internet of things and big data to organizations and their knowledge management practices”. Lect. Notes Business Inform. Process. 224 (2015): s. 495–513.
19. Kiel, D., Arnold, C., Collisi, M., Voigt, K.-I. The impact of the industrial internet of things on established business models. In: 25th International Association for Management of Technology Conference 2016, Proceedings: Technology – Future Thinking. pp. 673–695.
20. Li X., Li D., Wan J., Vasilakos A.V., Lai C.F., Wang S. A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of Industry 4.0, Wireless Networks 23 (1) (2015) 1–19.
21. Lynn, M.R. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurse Research (1986), Vol. 35, ISSU 6, pp. 382–385.
22. Mehrgani, B.E., Nadeau, S., Kenné, J.P. optimal Lockout/Tagout, preventive maintenance, human error and production policies. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 20(4), 2014: pp.453-470.
23. OSHA. Control of hazardous energy (Lockout/Tagout), U.S. Department of Labor & Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2002. https://www.osha.gov/controlhazardous-energy/
24. Podgórski, D., Majchrzycka, K., Dąbrowska, A., Gralewicz, G., Okrasa, M. “Towards a conceptual framework of OSH risk management in smart working environments based on smart PPE, ambient intelligence and the Internet of Things technologies”. Int. J. Occup. Safe. Ergon. 23, 1 (2017): s. 1–20.
25. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health 2006, Vol. 29, pp. 489–497.
26. Ravi, M., Sridharan, P., Senthilkumar V.K. Implementation strategy of lock out and tag out (LOTO) electrical systems for paper industry. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 6(1), 2018: 01-10. DOI: 10.30954/2322-0465.1.2018.1.
27. Reuter, M., Oberc, H., Wannöffel, M., Kreimeier, D., Klippert, J., Pawlicki, P., Kuhlenkötter, B. Learning factories ‘Trainings as an Enabler of Proactive Workers’ Participation Regarding Industrie 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 9, 354–360.
28. Roblek V., Meško M., Krapež A. A complex view of Industry 4.0, SAGE Open 6(2). 2016. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016653987.
29. Samuel C. Yamin, L. Parker, Rodney Stanley. Self-audit of lockout/tagout in manufacturing workplaces: A pilot study. Am J Ind Med. 2017; 60:504–509.
30. Simons, S., Abé, P., Neser, S. Learning in the AutFab – The fully automated Industrie 4.0. Learning factory of the University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt. Procedia Manuf. 9, 2017, 81–88.
31. Ślusarczyk B. Industry 4.0 – are we ready?. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2018, Vol.17 No.1, 232 – 248.
32. Thames L., Schaefer D. Software-defined cloud manufacturing for Industry 4.0, Procedia CIRP 52 (2016) 12–17.
33. Van Lier, B.,. Developing the industrial Internet of Things with a network centric approach: a holistic scientific perspective on smart industries. In: 18th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing, 2014, 6982436. pp. 324–329.
34. Vogel-Heuser B., Hess D. Guest editorial Industry 4.0–prerequisites and vi- sions, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13 (2) (2016) 411–413.
35. Waltz, C.F.; Strickland, O.L.; Lenz, E.R. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research, 3rd ed.; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
36. Wee D., Kelly R., Cattel J., Breunig M. Industry 4.0-How to Navigate Digitization of the Manufacturing Sector. McKinsey & Company, 2015.
37. ZHANG Hongjie, LIU Zhen-tang. Application of Lockout & Tagout System in the Coalmine. Industry. Procedia Engineering 26 (2011) 2065 – 2069

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-f5853146-801d-4b6b-92ba-af9371bf75e2