The evolution of the fishing fleet and its energy demand

• Autorzy: Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek Aneta , Czermański Ernest , Kowalik Jakub

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17402/487

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Maritime and coastal areas are the lifeblood of many countries, being essential to their well-being. They provide trade routes, regulate the climate, and supply both organic and inorganic resources, along with energy, a crucial requirement for living and recreation. However, there are emerging disparities and barriers in terms of marine exploitation. On the one hand, existing and evolving technologies and knowledge allow better utilization of the sea, while on the other hand, the cumulative effect of human activity leads to conflicts of interest and to a deterioration of the marine environment. This article aims to consider the impact of changes in the world economy on the evolution of the fishing fleet, including the characteristics of vessels produced in consecutive years. We also attempt to determine the most common type of vessel presently operating in the world fleet. A number of external factors impact the organization and operation of the world’s fishing fleet, including economic, geographical, and political factors. The strength of each factor varies depending on the conditions in which the fleet operates. Also, we would also like to establish to what extent efforts aimed at energy demand reduction have affected the characteristics of the current fleet, determining the scale and direction of change, while also identifying any relevant constraints and limitations. The intention behind this paper is to discover the size and structure of the fishing fleet and whether it is changing as a result of environmental transformation. With this objective in mind, we have outlined a review of the literature and used statistical methods in order to carry out a comparative analysis of the size and structure of the world’s fishing fleet.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fishing vessels; fishery; blue growth; energy demand; sustainable development; maritime sectors

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 68 (140)
• Strony: 57--65
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek Aneta

• University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Department of Transport and Maritime Trade, 119/121 Armii Krajowej St., 81-824, Sopot, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4268-0011

autor

Czermański Ernest

• University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Department of Transport and Maritime Trade, 119/121 Armii Krajowej St., 81-824, Sopot, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-8093

autor

Kowalik Jakub

• University of Gdańsk, Faculty of Economics, Department of Transport and Maritime Trade, 119/121 Armii Krajowej St., 81-824, Sopot, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-6961

Bibliografia

• 1. Ababouch, L. (2015) Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Context of Blue Economy. Conference “Feeding Africa – An Action Plan for African Agricultural Transformation”, Dakar, Senegal, 21 Oct. 2015.
• 2. Asche, F., Bjørndal, T. & Gordon, D.V. (2009) Resource Rent in Individual Quota Fisheries. Land Economics 85(2), pp. 279–291, doi: 10.3368/le.85.2.279.
• 3. Asche, F., Tranberg Bjørndal, M. & Bjørndal, T. (2014) Development in fleet fishing capacity in rights based fisheries. Marine Policy 44, pp. 166–171, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol. 2013.08.018.
• 4. Carbon Trust (2006) Marine energy cost estimation. [Online] Available from: https://www.carbontrust.com/resources/marine-energy-cost-estimation [Accessed: August 15, 2020].
• 5. Collins, C., Nuno, A., Benaragama, A., Broderick, A., Wijesundara, I., Wijetunge, D. & Letessier, T.B. (2021) Ocean‐scale footprint of a highly mobile fishing fleet: Social‐ecological drivers of fleet behaviour and evidence of illegal fishing. People and Nature 3(3), pp. 740–755, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10213.
• 6. Comer, B., Olmer, N., Mao, X., Roy, B. & Rutherford, D. (2017) Black Carbon Emissions and Fuel Use in Global Shipping, 2015. Washington DC: The International Council on Clean Transportation.
• 7. Commission of the European Communities (2007) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, COM(2007) 575 final.
• 8. Czermański, E. (2019) Morska żegluga kontenerowa a zrównoważony rozwój transportu. Gdańsk: Wyd. Instytutu Transportu i Handlu Morskiego Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
• 9. Czermański, E., Oniszczuk-Jastrząbek, A. & Pawłowska, B. (2021) Polityka morska Unii Europejskiej w zakresie zrównoważonego rozwoju obszarów morskich. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
• 10. European Commission (2014a) Innovation in the Blue Economy: Realizing the potential of our seas and oceans for jobs and growth. COM (2014) 254.
• 11. European Commission (2014b) Questions and Answers on an action plan to support the development of blue energy. [Online] 20 January. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/ commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_14_31 [Accessed: August 10, 2020].
• 12. European Commission (2018) Study on the Economic Benefits of MPAs. Final Report. Brussels: European Union.
• 13. European Commission (2020) The 2020 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF 20-06).
• 14. European Commission (2021) The EU Blue Economy Report 2021. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• 15. FAO (2020) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Rome. [Online] Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/ca9229en.pdf [Accessed: September 4, 2021].
• 16. FAO (2021a) Fishery fleet. [Online] Available at: https:// www.fao.org/cwp-on-fishery-statistics/handbook/capture-fisheries-statistics/fishery-fleet/en/ [Accessed: September 4, 2021].
• 17. FAO (2021b) International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishery Vessels by GRT Categories (ISSCFV – GRT category) (ISSCFV, Rev. 1, 1990) (also available at http:// www.fao.org/3/cb5200en/cb5200en.pdf) [Accessed: September 4, 2021].
• 18. IMO (2011) Resolution of the IMO MEPC.203(62), July 2011.
• 19. IMO (2021) Resolution of the IMO MEPC.217(76), July 2021.
• 20. Kirkley, J.E. & Squires, D. (1999) Capacity and capacity utilization in fishing industries. Discusssion Paper 99-16. San Diego, US: University of California.
• 21. Kuiken, K. (2012) Diesel engines for ship propulsion and power plants. Onnen, Netherlands: TGET.
• 22. Maritime Portal (2021) https://maritime.ihs.com [Accessed: September 4, 2021].
• 23. OECD-FAO (2021) Fish. In OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030. pp. 190–201.
• 24. Rousseau, Y., Watson, R.A., Blanchard, J.L. & Fulton, E.A. (2019) Evolution of global marine fishing fleets and the response of fished resources. PNAS 116, 25, pp. 12238– 12243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820344116.
• 25. Sumaila, U.R. & Pauly, D. (2007) All fishing nations must unite to cut subsidies. Nature 450, 945, doi: 10.1038/450945a.
• 26. Villasante, S. & Sumaila, U.R. (2010) Estimating the effects of technological efficiency on the European fishing fleet. Marine Policy 34, 3, pp. 720–722, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.11.008.