Integrating Behavior Into Regional Resilience Concept for Sustainable Growth: An Example of Agricultural Sector

Žičkienė, Agnė; Volkov, Artiom; Baležentis, Tomas; Štreimikienė, Dalia

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Integrating Behavior Into Regional Resilience Concept for Sustainable Growth: An Example of Agricultural Sector

Autorzy

Žičkienė Agnė , Volkov Artiom , Baležentis Tomas , Štreimikienė Dalia

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Integracja behawioru z koncepcją resilencji regionalnej na rzecz zrównoważonego wzrostu: przykład sektora rolnego

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Regional economic resilience, which is a necessary and indispensable component for ensuring both regional and overall sustainability, is understood principally in relation to the system’s structure and overall functioning ignoring human agency and its bounded rationality. This leads to missing important and potentially crucial elements fostering or hindering resilience, and consequently to designing resilience enhancing programs with low effectiveness. This paper argues that the focus of the resilience concept should shift from the system structure to the behavior of agents, since any outcome at the macro level is a product of the myriad of interacting behaviors. The structure of the system and all the context matters as the options for the behavior and which options are chosen depends on the internal factors of the decision maker. A framework, depicting the mechanism how the above mentioned factors interact and determine behavior thus consequently influencing resilience is proposed. An exemplary analysis of how to use the framework is also presented.

Regionalna resilencja ekonomiczna rozważana jest przede wszystkim w odniesieniu do struktury systemu i ogólnego funkcjonowania, ignorując ludzkie działania i związaną z nimi racjonalność. Jest niezbędnym elementem zapewniającym regionalną i ogólną zrównoważoność, w szczególności w jej wymiarze ekonomicznym. Jednak wąskie podejście do niej w konsekwencji prowadzi do utraty ważnych, potencjalnie kluczowych elementów wspierających lub utrudniających resilencję, a zatem opracowywane tak programy mające zwiększać resilencję charakteryzuje niska skuteczność. W tym artykule sugeruje się, że celem koncepcji resilencji powinno być przesunięcie ze struktury systemu na behawior, ponieważ każdy wynik na poziomie makro jest wynikiem niezliczonych zachowań. Struktura systemu i cały kontekst ma znaczenie, ponieważ opcje zachowania i dokonany wybór zależą od wewnętrznych czynników decydenta. Zaproponowano ramy obrazujące mechanizm interakcji wyżej wymienionych czynników i determinujące zachowanie, a tym samym wpływające na resilencję. Przedstawiono także przykładową analizę korzystania z frameworka.

Słowa kluczowe

behavior regional resilience model sustainability risk management agriculture

behawior resilencja regionalna modelowanie zrównoważoność zarządzanie ryzykiem rolnictwo

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2020

Tom

Vol. 15, nr 2

Strony

61--73

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 47 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Žičkienė Agnė

agne.zickiene@laei.lt

Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos str. 18-2, Vilnius, Lithuania

autor

Volkov Artiom

Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Kudirkos str. 18-2, Vilnius, Lithuania
artiom.volkov @laei.lt

autor

Baležentis Tomas

autor

Štreimikienė Dalia

Bibliografia

1. AJZEN I., 1991, The theory of planned behavior, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), p. 179-211.
2. ALDRICH D. P., 2017, The Importance of Social Capital in Building Community Resilience, chapter 23 in his book: Rethinking Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation in a Time of Change.
3. ALGAN Y., CAHUC P., 2010, Inherited trust and growth, in: The American Economic Review, 100, p. 2060-2092.
4. AVEN T., 2016, Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation, in: European Journal of Operational Research, 253, p. 1-13.
5. BANDURA A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
6. BARNES W., GARTLAND M.. STACK M., 2004, Old Habits Die Hard: Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-In, in: Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2), p. 371-377.
7. BOSCHMA R., 2015, Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience, in: Regional Studies, 49(5), p. 733-751.
8. BRIGUGLIO L., CORDINA G., BUGEJA S., Nadia FARRUGIA N., 2006, Conceptualizing and measuring economic resilience.
9. BRISTOW G., HEALY A., 2014, Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective, in: Regional Studies 48(5), p. 923-935.
10. BRISTOW G., HEALY A., 2017, Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis, in: Ann Reg Sci, 60, p. 265-284.
11. BRONFENBRENNER U., 1989, Ecological systems theory, in: Annals of Child Development, vol. 6, ed. Vasta R., Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, p. 187-249.
12. BURTON I., 1987, Report on reports: Our common future: The world commission on environment and development, Environment, in: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 29(5), p. 25-29.
13. CARPENTER S., WALKER B., ANDERIES J.M., ABEL N., 2001, From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? In: Ecosystems, 4, p. 765-781.
14. DE BRUJIN K.M., VAN DER MOST H., CUMISKEY L., HOUNJET M., MENS M., 2018, Methods and Tools Supporting Urban Resilience Planning: Experiences from Cork, Ireland, in: Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 6, p. 290-309.
15. DERISSEN S., QUAAS M. F., BAUMGÄRTNER, S., 2011, The relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems, in: Ecological Economics, 70(6), p. 1121-1128.
16. DESROCHERS P., LEPPALA S., 2011, Opening up the ‘Jacobs Spillovers’ black box: local diversity, creativity and the processes underlying new combinations, in: Journal of Economic Geography 11(5), p. 843-863.
17. DORAN J., FINGELTON B., 2013, US Metropolitan Area Resilience: Insights from Dynamic Spatial Panel Estimation, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Regional Science Association International (British and Irish Section), University of Cambridge.
18. EC (European Commission), 2017, Risk management schemes in EU agriculture. Dealing with risk and volatility. EU Agricultural Markets Briefs 12.
19. EVANS R., KARECHA J., 2013, Staying on Top: Why is Munich so Resilient and Successful? In: European Planning Studies 22(6).
20. GIAMPIETRI E., VERNEAU F., DEL GIUCIDE T., CARFORA V., FINCO A., 2018, A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective for Investigating the Role of Trust in Consumer Purchasing Decision Related to Short Food Supply Chains, in: Food Quality and Preference, 64, p. 160-166.
21. HAGGER, M. S., CHATZISARANTIS N. L. D., BIDDLE S. J. H., 2002, A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables, in: Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, p. 3-32.
22. HILL E., ST CLAIR T., WIAL H., WOLMAN H., ATKINS P., BLUMETHAL P., FICENEC S., FRIEDHOFF A., 2011, Economic Shocks and Regional Economic Resilience, MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Building Resilient Regions at the University of California, Berkeley, CA.
23. HILL E., WIAL H., WOLMAN H., 2008, Exploring Regional Economic Resilience, Working Paper Working Paper No. 2008-04, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
24. KULIESIS G., PAREIGIENE L., 2010, Nuostatų kooperuotis vertinimas, in: Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, 5(24).
25. LEBEL L., ANDERIES J. M., CAMPBELL B., FOLKE C., HATFIELD-DODDS S., HUGHES T. P., WILSON J., 2006, Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems.
26. LEUNGA L., CHEN CH., 2017, Extending the theory of planned behavior: A study of lifestyles, contextual factors, mobile viewing habits, TV content interest,and intention to adopt mobile TV, in: Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), p. 1638-1649.
27. LINKOV I., BRIDGES T., CREUTZIG F., DECKER J., FOX-LENT C., KRÖGER W., LAMBERT J.H., LEVERMANN A., MONTREUIL B., NATHWANI J., NYER R., RENN O., SCHARTE B., SCHEFFLER A., SCHREURS M., THIELCLEMEN T., 2014, Changing the resilience paradigm, in: Nature Climate Change, 4, p. 407-409.
28. MARECHAL K., 2010, Not irrational but habitual: The importance of ‘behavioural lock-in’ in energy consumption, in: Ecological Economics 69(5), p. 1104-114.
29. MARTIN R., SUNLEY P., 2015, On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation, in: Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), p. 1-42.
30. MARTIN R., SUNLEY P., GARDINER B., TYLER P., 2016, How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure, in: Regional Studies, 50:4, p. 561-585.
31. MARTIN-BREEN P., ANDERIES J. M., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review, Background Paper, The Bellagio Initiative, Institute of Development Studies (IDS), the Resource Alliance, the Rockefeller Foundation.
32. MEHMOOD A., 2016, Of resilient places: planning for urban resilience, in ; European Planning Studies, 24:2, p. 407-419.
33. MITCHELL T., HARRIS K., 2012, Resilience: a Risk Management Approach, Background Note. Overseas Development Institute, https://www.odi. org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-op Inion-files/7552.pdf.
34. MURRAY K.B., HAEUBL G. 2017, Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 34.
35. OBSCHONKA M., STURTZER M., AUDRETSCH D.B., RENTFROW P.J., POTTER J., GOSLING S.D., 2016, Macro-psychological factors predict regional economic resilience during a major economic crisis, in: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), p. 95-104.
36. OECD, 2011, Trade and Agriculture Directorate. Committee for Agriculture. Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets. Synthesis Report On Risk Management in Agriculture.
37. PENDALL R., FOSTER K. A., COWELL M., 2010, Resilience and Regions: Building Understanding of the Metaphor, in: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, p. 71-84.
38. PERRIGS C., 2006, Resilience and sustainable development, in: Environment and Development Economics, 11(4), p. 417-427.
39. Resilience Alliance, 2010, Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems, Workbook for practitioners, Version 2.0.
40. ROSE A. Z., 2009, Economic Resilience to Disasters, CARRI Research Report 8. Community and Regional Resilience Institute.
41. ROSE A., OLAUDOSU G., LEE B., BEELERASAY G., 2009, The Economic Impacts of the 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis Peace Economics, in: Peace Science, and Public Policy, 15(2).
42. SIMMIE J., MARTIN R., 2010, The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), p. 27-43.
43. SIMONOVIC S. P., 2016, From Risk Management to Quantitative Disaster Resilience – a Paradigm Shift, in: International Journal of Safety and Security Eng., 6(2), p. 85-95.
44. STEEL G. D., RINNE T., FAIRWEATHER J., 2012, Personality, nations, and innovations: Relationships between the Big Five personality traits and national innovation scores, in: Cross-Cultural Research, 46, p. 3-30.
45. WINK R., KIRCHNER L., KOCH F., SPEDA D., 2018, The economic resilience of Stuttgart: vulnerable but resilient and adaptable, chapter 4 in their book: Economic Crisis and the Resilience of Regions, p. 41-60.
46. World Bank, 2015, World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior, Washington D.C.
47. World Economic Forum, 2013, Special Report: Building National Resilence to Global Risks, Davos.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-f4a09878-6dde-4edd-9291-c14a0917b4e2