Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
A growing number of Czech construction companies now recognise the importance of supplementing traditional financial measurements with a wider range of non-financial measurements as well. A significant number of organisations are adopting different models of performance measurement to implement business improvement strategies. The main aim of our research was to elucidate the importance that Czech construction companies attach to the individual criteria used in measurement systems. Original data were collected using a questionnaire survey. The answers were quantified in terms of the frequency of occurrence and relative importance index. The results show that traditional measurement criteria such as time and cost are still the most important for construction companies measurement systems. Positive finding is that certain new areas of measurement are increasingly being incorporated into measurement practice and their importance for Czech construction companies is growing rapidly, especially in the area of measuring the productivity of workers and craftsmen together with the productivity of subcontractors. The environmental impact of construction is still one of the least important areas in the measurement systems of construction contracts in Czech construction companies.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
481--492
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 34 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic
autor
- Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
- [1] R.S. Toor, S.O. Ogunlana, “Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects”, International Journal of Project Management, 2010, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 228-236; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005.
- [2] H.A. Bassionini, T.M. Hassan, A.D.F. Price, “Evaluation and analysis of criteria and sub-criteria of a construction excellence model”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2008, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-21; DOI: 10.1108/09699980810842043.
- [3] S.Yu, et al., “In support of circular economy to evaluate the effects of policies of construction and demolition waste management in three key cities in Yangtze River Delta”, Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 2022, vol. 26, art. ID 100625; DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100625.
- [4] O. Babalola, E.O. Ibem, “Implementation of lean practices in the construction industry: A systematic review”, Building and Environment, 2019, vol. 148, pp. 34-43; DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.051.
- [5] M. Franco-Santos, L. Lucianetti, M. Bourne, “Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research”, Management Accounting Research, 2012, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 79-119; DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.
- [6] A.H. Memon, I.A. Rahman, “SEM-PLS analysis of inhibiting factors of cost performance for large construction projects in Malaysia: perspective of clients and consultants”, The Scientific World Journal, 2014, vol. 2014, art ID 165158; DOI: 10.1155/2014/165158.
- [7] S.Z.H.S. Jamaludin, M.F. Mohammad, K. Ahmad, “Enhancing the quality of construction environment by minimizing the cost variance”, Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2014, vol. 153, pp. 70-78; DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.042.
- [8] M. Proaño-Narváez, C. Flores-Vázquez, P. Vásquez Quiroz, M. Avila-Calle, “Earned Value Method (EVM) for Construction Projects: Current Application and Future Projections”, Buildings, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3; DOI: 10.3390/buildings12030301.
- [9] N. Nassar, S. AbouRizk, “Practical application for integrated performance measurement of construction projects”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 2014, vol. 30, no. 6; DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000287.
- [10] H. Yang, J.F. Yeung, A.P. Chan, Y.H. Chiang, D.W. Chan, “A critical review of performance measurement in construction”, Journal of Facilities Management, 2010, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 269-284; DOI: 10.1108/14725961011078981.
- [11] E. Westerveld, “The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical success factors”, International Journal of Project Management, 2003, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 411-418; DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00112-6.
- [12] C.P. Kartha, “ISO 9000:2000 quality management systems standards: TQM focus in the new revision”, Journal of American Academy of Business, 2002, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-6.
- [13] E. Plebankiewicz, A. Leśniak, E. Vitkova, V. Hromadka, “Models for estimating costs of public buildings maintaining - review and assessment”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2022, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 335-351; DOI: 10.24425/ace.2022.140171.
- [14] H. Doloi, A. Sawhney, K.C. Iyer, S. Rentala, “Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects”, International Journal of Project Management, 2012, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 479-489; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004.
- [15] P. Dahlin, O. Pesämaa, “Drivers of cost and time overruns: A client and contractor perspective”, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2374-2382; DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2021-0006.
- [16] E. Kania, G. Śladowski, E. Radziszewska-Zielina, B. Sroka, “Analysis of the impact of communication between the participants of a construction project on its completion time and cost”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2022, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 595-610; DOI: 10.24425/ace.2022.140188.
- [17] H.S. Lee, M.S. Park, S.H. Song, “Quality performance management system for construction projects using quality performance indicators”, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 76-85.
- [18] H.S. Cha, C.K. Kim, “Quantitative approach for project performance measurement on building construction in South Korea”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1319-1328.
- [19] A. Mohammadi, M. Tavakolan, Y. Khosravi, “Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review”, Safety Science, 2018, vol. 109, pp. 382-397; DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.017.
- [20] G. Fernández-Sánchez, F. Rodríguez-López, “Methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management - Application to infrastructure projects in Spain”, Ecological Indicators, 2010, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1193-1201; DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.009.
- [21] M.B. Purushothaman, S. Kumar, “Environment, resources, and surroundings based dynamic project schedule model for the road construction industry in New Zealand”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2022, vol. 11, no. 2; DOI: 10.1108/SASBE-08-2021-0145.
- [22] A. Radziejowska, A. Sobotka, “Assessment of large-panel prefabricated buildings in the social aspect of sustainable construction”, Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 93-108; DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.138045.
- [23] M.J. Ballesteros, M.D. Fernández, S. Quintana, et al., “Noise emission evolution on construction sites. Measurement for controlling and assessing its impact on the people and on the environment”, Building and Environment, 2010, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 711-717; DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.011.
- [24] J. Hong, T. Hong, H. Kang, M. Lee, “A framework for reducing dust emissions and energy consumption on construction sites”, Energy Procedia, 2019, vol. 158, pp. 5092-5096; DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.637.
- [25] Y. Hongping, “Key indicators for assessing the effectiveness of waste management in construction projects”, Ecological Indicators, 2013, vol. 24, pp. 476-484; DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.022.
- [26] Ch. Hee-Sung, T.K. Kim, “Developing measurement system for key performance indicators on building construction projects”, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2008, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 20-130.
- [27] M. Loosemore, “Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor’s perspective”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2014, vol. 21, no. 3; DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2013-0043.
- [28] K. Galjanić, I. Marović, N. Jajac, “Decision Support Systems for Managing Construction Projects: A Scientific Evolution Analysis”, Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 9, art. ID 4977; DOI: 10.3390/su14094977.
- [29] P.C. Chan, D. Scott, A.P.L. Chan, “Factors affecting the success of a construction project”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 153-155; DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
- [30] R.F. Wagner, M. Radujkovic, “Effects of lagging projectification in the public sector on realizing infrastructure projects”, Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2559-2570; DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2022-0002.
- [31] Ústav pro studium totality se rekonstruovat nebude. Kontrola Schillerové zjistila řadu pochybení. Už je řeší finanční úřad. Ekonomický deník, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ekonomickydenik.cz/ustav-prostudium-totality-se-rekonstruovat-nebude-kontrola-schillerove-zjistila-radu-pochybeni-uz-je-resi-financniurad/. [Accessed: 2022-04-30].
- [32] M. Halou, R. Samin, M. Ahmad, “Impacts of change management on risk and cost management of a construction projects”, Journal of Project Management, 2019, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157-164; DOI: 10.5267/j.jpm.2019.1.005.
- [33] P. Trtílek, T. Hanák, “Contracts’ Performance Measurement in Czech Construction Companies”, Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 214-236; DOI: 10.2478/ceer-2021-0058.
- [34] B. Nikmehr, M.R. Hosseini, I. Martek, E.K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene, “Digitalization as a strategic means of achieving sustainable efficiencies in construction management: A critical review”, Sustainability, 2021, vol. 3, no. 9, art. ID 5040; DOI: 10.3390/su13095040.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f4597f89-2c86-4c09-843c-b28c14a5a9d4