Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
DOI
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This article aims to identify the degree of innovation of General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces (MULF) military students in their education process, which set the education of future leaders, including officers of Air Defense Forces (ADF), as one of their priorities. In the research process, qualitative research methods were used, including the analysis of literature sources (content analysis technique) and a case study. It also employed a quantitative method, including a diagnostic survey, carried out using the survey technique. The main research tool was questionnaires developed by the co-authors, addressed to military students, who received a promotion for the first officer's rank about a month after the survey. The empirical results show that: the respondents almost unequivocally indicated that they like to work as a team. However, the progress in creativity at the moment of officer promotion is noticeable, the most important feature of teachers according to respondents are soft skills and that significance is increased due to increasing the service quality of officers.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
82--98
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
autor
- General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
autor
- General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
autor
- General Tadeusz Kościuszko Military University of Land Forces, Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Aleksanyan, A. (2019). Modern Problems of Innovative Education. Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series Pedagogical Sciences,3(2019), 12–15. http://doi. org/10.31651/2524-2660-2019-3-14-17
- 2. Breivik-Mayer, M., Arntzen-Nordqvist, M.,& Alsos, G.A. (2020). The role of incubator support in new firms accumulation of resources and capabilities. Journal Innovation Organization & Management, 22(3), 228–249. http://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684204
- 3. Burke II Laurence, M. (2020). Methodologies and Models in Military Innovation Studies. International Journal of Military History and Historiography, 40 (1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1163/24683302-20190002
- 4. Cai, Y., & Tang, R. (2021). School support for teacher innovation: Mediating effects of teacher self-efficacy and moderating effects of trust. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41 (2).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100854
- 5. Dhillon, B.S. (2006). Creativity for Engineers. Singapore.
- 6. Divinagracia, M.R.G.,& Divinagracia, L.A. (2012). Students’ Attitudinal Constraints towards Workplace Diversity Managing Innovation in International Business Education. Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.164
- 7. Drucker, P. (1992). Innowacja i przedsiębiorczość. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
- 8. Griffin, S. (2016). Military Innovation Studies: Multidisciplinary or Lacking Discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40 (1–2), 196–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358
- 9. Haun, P. (2020). Peacetime military innovation through inter-service cooperation: The unique case of the U.S. Air Force and Battlefield Air Interdiction. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43 (5), 710–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1557053
- 10. Jamieson, M.V., & Shaw, J.M. (2020). Teaching engineering innovation, design, and leadership through a community of practice. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.001
- 11. Knossala, R., Boratyńska-Sala, B., Jurczyk-Bunkowska, M., & Moczała, A. (2014). Zarządzanie innowacjami. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne S.A.
- 12. Krawczyk, K., & Showalter, D. (2020). Utilizing environmental remediation to teach research skills: An instructional case. Journal of Accounting Education, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100659
- 13. Lee, C., (2019). The role of culture in military innovation studies: Lessons learned from the US Air Force’s adoption of the Predator Drone, 1993–1997. Journal of Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1668272
- 14. Santerek, K. (2016). Działania rozwijające kreatywność i innowacyjność studentów. Polska Akademia Nauk – Komitet Inżynierii Produkcji.
- 15. Suslov, D., Lopukha, A., & Markovchin, S. (2020). Problems of modern military education. CITISE, 1 (23), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2020.1.05
- 16. Suslov, D., Yaroslavtseva, N., & Evdokimov, A. (2020). Innovation of military education: challenges and prospects. CITISE,1 (23), 135–146. http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2020.1.13
- 17. Swanson, E., McCulley, L.V., Osman, D., Lewis, N.S.,& Solis, M. (2019). The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20 (1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417731201
- 18. Tinmaz, H., Yakin, Y. (2015). Tendencies of Engineering Students on Applying Technological Innovations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.519
- 19. Walder, A.M. (2014). The Preliminary and Subsequent Stages to Integrating Pedagogical Innovation: The Crux of the Matter for the Innovator. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60 (1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v60i1.55758
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f449d9cc-e139-4b8a-8af8-36000cf4ee0b