Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the Reality of Globalization Crisis

• Autorzy: Zinchuk Tetyana , Kutsmus Nataliia , Prokopchuk Oksana , Lagodiienko Volodymyr , Nych Tetiana , Naumko Yuliia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/132094

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article is devoted to the study of implementing the multifunctionality of agriculture in the context of the globalization crisis. In particular, it is the assessment of the indicators related to implementing the multifunctionality of agriculture concept in Ukraine, the mutual influence of the industry efficiency, and the efficiency of performing certain functions. The practical implementation of the multifunctionality of agriculture concept was proven. It has acquired conceptually new features under globalization, such as the diversification of functions and the integration into the global economic space. The expediency of distinguishing the globalization function of agriculture was substantiated. The function involves intensified integration of countries in the global economic processes due to the activation of international trade transactions with agricultural products, the participation in the implementation of global programs aimed at overcoming hunger and poverty. A close relationship between the economic efficiency of agriculture and the effectiveness related to the implementation of its functions, was established. The increased efficiency of the realization of economic and globalization functions of the industry was proven. It was substantiated that the activation of the social and ecological functions of agriculture requires consolidated efforts of business entities and state institutions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multifunctionality; globalization; crisis; agriculture; function of agriculture

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 22, iss. 1
• Strony: 51--59
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zinchuk Tetyana

• Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-2394

autor

Kutsmus Nataliia

• Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-7019

autor

Prokopchuk Oksana

• Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-2693

autor

Lagodiienko Volodymyr

• Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies, Odesa, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-5488

autor

Nych Tetiana

• Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-2009

autor

Naumko Yuliia

• Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Andersen, P.S., Vejre, H., Dalgaard, T., Brandt, J. (2013). An indicator-based method for quantifying farm multifunctionality. Ecological Indicators, 25, 166–179.
• 2. Babenko, V.A. (2013). Formation of economic-mathematical model for process dynamics of innovative technologies management at agroindustrial enterprises. Actual Problems of Economics, 139 (1), 182-186.
• 3. Blandford, D., &Boisvert, R. (2002), Multifunctional agriculture and domestic/International policy choice. Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 3(1). 106–118.
• 4. Boiko, V., Kwilinski, A., Misiuk, M., & Boiko, L. (2019). Competitive Advantages of Wholesale Markets of Agricultural Products as a Type of Entrepreneurial Activity: The Experience of Ukraine and Poland. Economic Annals-XXI, 175(1-2), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-12
• 5. Borodina, O. (2006). Derzhavna pidtrymka sil's'kogo gospodarstva: concepcija, mekhanizmy, efektyvnist'. Economika i prognozuvannja, 1. 109-125.
• 6. Borodina, O., Heiets, V., & Hutorov, A. (2012), Ukrainska model ahrarnoho rozvytku ta yii sotsioekonomichna pereoriientatsiia, Kyiv, 56. p.
• 7. Bulysheva, D.V. (2015). Improvement of recreational land use as an element of urban agglomerations’ sustainable development. Actual Problems of Economics, 172(10), 261-269.
• 8. Caron, P., Reig, E., Roep, D., Hediger, W., Le Cotty, T., Barthelemy, D., Hadynska, A., Hadynski, J., Oostindie, H.A., Sabourin, E. (2008). Multifunctionality: Refocusing a spreading, loose and fashionable concept for looking at sustainability? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(4/5), 301–318.
• 9. Chang, K., Ying, Y.-h. (2005), External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan’s rice fields. Social Science Journal, 42(2). 285–293.
• 10. Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A., Miśkiewicz, R. (2019). Public goods versus the farm price-cost squeeze: shaping the sustainability of the EU’s common agricultural policy. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.7449
• 11. Delgado, M., Ramos, E., Gallardo, R., & Ramos, F. (2003) Multifunctionality and rural development: a necessary convergence. In: Huylenbroeck, G., Durand, G. (Eds.) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Van Aldershot; Burlington, VT (Ashgate), 19–36.
• 12. Dibden, J., Cocklin, Ch. (2009). 'Multifunctionality': trade protectionism or a new way forward? Environment and Planning, 41, 163-182.
• 13. Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol–Barosz, M., Kwilinski, A. (2020). Formation of Global Competitive Enterprise Environment Based on Industry 4.0 Concept. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 1-5. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/formationof-global-competitive-enterprise-environmentbased-on-industry-40-concept-9079.html
• 14. Hall, C., McVittie, A., & Moran, D. (2004), What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(2). 211–225.
• 15. Huylenbroek, G., van Durand, G. (2003). Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Alderholt, UK. Ashgate. 256 p.
• 16. Huylenbroek, G. van, Vandermeulen, V., Mettepenningen, E., Verspecht, A. (2007). Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 1. 35 p. (retrieved from http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2007-3).
• 17.Jordan, N., Warner, K.D. (2010). Enhancing the multifunctionality of US agriculture. BioScience, 60(1), 60–66.
• 18. Korzun, M. (2015). The relationship between different approaches to multifunctionality of agriculture and choice of methods: A critical review. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 5(2), 109–128.
• 19. Kwilinski, A., Ruzhytskyi, I., Patlachuk, V., Patlachuk, O., Kaminska, B. (2019). Environmental taxes as a condition of business responsibility in the conditions of sustainable development. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(SI 2): 1-6.
• 20. McGranahan, D. A. (2014). Ecologies of scale: Multifunctionality connects conservation and agriculture across fields, farms, and landscapes. Land, 3(3), 739–769.
• 21. Mettepenningen, E, Verspecht, A. (2008). Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. https://doc.uments.com/g-multifunctionality-ofagriculture-a-review-of-definitions-evidence.pdf
• 22. Moon, W. (2015). Conceptualising multifunctional agriculture from a globalperspective: Implications for governing agricultural trade in thepost-Doha Round era. Land Use Policy, 49. 252–263.
• 23. Moon, W., & Griffith, J.W. (2011). Assessing holistic economic value of multifunctional agriculture. Food Policy, 36 (4), 455–465.
• 24. Mura, L., & Ključnikov, A. (2018). Small businesses in rural tourism and agro tourism: Study from Slovakia. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 286-300.
• 25. Olshanska, O.V. (2011). Region as a spatial socioeconomic system. Actual Problems of Economics, 117(3), pp. 184–191.
• 26. Paarlberg Ph., Bredahl M., & Lee J. (2003). Multifunctionality and agricultural trade negotiations. Review of Agricultural Economics, 24(2). 322-335.
• 27. Popova, O. (2015). Rozvytok bagatofunkcional’nogo sil's'kogo gospodarstva: dosvid Nimechchyny. Economika i prognozuwannja, 2. 148-158.
• 28. Prokopenko, O., Kysly, V., & Shevchenko, H. (2014). Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8, 40-43.
• 29. Renting, H., Oostindie, H., Laurent, C., Brunori, G., Barjolle, D., Jervell, A. M., Granberg, L., & Heinonen, M. (2008). Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new institutional arrangements. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(4/5), 361–385.
• 30. Shorikov, A.F., & Babenko, V.A. (2014). Optimization of assured result in dynamical model of management of innovation process in the enterprise of agricultural production complex. Economy of Region, 1, pp. 196-202. doi: 10.17059/2014-1-18
• 31. Vatn, A. (2002). Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3). 309–327.
• 32. Wilson, G. (2007). Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective, CABI. 154 p.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).