PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Value pluralism in sustainable development: towards transdisciplinary research

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Mapping values and goals of sustainable development has resulted in a number of diverse evaluation instruments – sustainability indicators. For the experts in applied ethics, this inventory of indicators represents a general value inventory, which requires attention, ethical review and ethical audit to determine the extent to which these values support the sustainability ethos and are a desirable and correct part of the value structures in the society. In an environment characterised by value pluralism and institutional complexity of sustainable development, the organisations implementing sustainable development projects face a range of problems in their struggle to achieve the relevant goals while having to address social, economic, and environmental commitments. Transdisciplinarity, as a new way to organise research, reflects in the new organisational and institutional processes. It represents a new type of cooperation among scholars from different fields, practical experts and organisations (regional and international) – and a new type of research. This indicates that issues pertaining to ecology, ethics and other fields cross the borders and the individual disciplines are cooperating.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
59--66
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 16 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Matej Bel University, Faculty of Arts, Banská Bystrica
Bibliografia
  • 1. Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Annerstedt, M., Axelsson, R., et al. (2013). Solving Problems in Social–Ecological Systems: Definition, Practice and Barriers of Transdisciplinary Research. AMBIO, 42, 254-265. Available at: https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4#Sec2.
  • 2. Belcher, B.M., Rasmussen, K.E., Kemshaw, M.R., Zornes, D.A. (2016). Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context. Res. Eval., 25, 1-17.
  • 3. Bostrom, M. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 8, 12, 3-14.
  • 4. Fobel, P. Institutionalisation of Ethics in Slovakia. In D. Fobelová et al., Applied Ethics in Theory and Practice: international experiences from: Austria, Brasilia, England, Finland, Nigeria, Slovakia, USA.
  • 5. Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann H., Biber, R.S., Grossenbacher, W. et al. (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary research. Springer Science.
  • 6. Klein, J.T. (2008). Hodnotenie interdisciplinárneho a transdisciplinárneho výskumu: prehľad literatúry. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 2, 116-123.
  • 7. Klimková, A. (2015). Prípadovosť – komunikácia – ekologická etika. Košice: UPJŠ.
  • 8. Klimková, A. (2017). Deconstruction and evaluation of agenda 2030 and local agenda 21 in the context of applied ethics. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, s. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 110, 81-90.
  • 9. Kondrla, P. (2010). Hodnoty a postmoderna. Bratislava: IRIS, 122.
  • 10. Kopnina, H., Blewitt, J. (2018). Sustainable Business: Key Issues (Key Issues in Environment and Sustainability). Routledge (Kindle Edition).
  • 11. Kuzior, A. (2014). Aksjologia zrównoważonego rozwója. Banská Bystrica: Belianum.
  • 12. Linhart, J., Petrusek, M., Vodáková, A., Maříková, H. (2016). Veľký Sociologický Slovník. Praha: Karolinum.
  • 13. Roux, D.J., Nel, J.L., Cundill G., O’Farrell P., Fabricius C. Transdisciplinary research for systemic change: who to learn with, what to learn about and how to learn. Sustain Sci. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11625-017-0446-0.
  • 14. Svitačová, E., Kováčiková, E. (2016). Implementation of developmental topics into university education. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal, 5, 1.
  • 15. Triste, L., Debruyne, L., Vandenabeele, J., Marchand, F., Lauwers, L. (2018). Communities of practice for knowledge co-creation on sustainable dairy farming: features for value creation for farmers. Sustainability Science, 13, 1427-1442.
  • 16. Vladyková, Ľ. (2013). Interdisciplinárne konotácie ekologicko-etických koncepcií, Košice: UPJŠ.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f3b18329-f319-4e6b-ac01-8280501ad7f4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.