Corporate social responsibility : the context of stakeholders pressure in Lithuania

• Autorzy: Bakanauskiene I. , Staniuliene S. , Zirgutis V.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2016.13.1.02

Warianty tytułu

PL

Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw : kontekst presji interesariuszy na Litwie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the results of empirical research on stakeholders‘ impact to Lithuanian business organizations to perform corporate social responsibility. Theoretical research framework is based on International Business Environmental Barometer (IBEB) research tool and covers strength and types of different stakeholders, organizational strategies of relations with them, and consequences of stakeholders’ impact. The results revealed quite low stakeholders pressure on business organizations’ to perform CSR.

PL

Artykuł prezentuje wyniki badań empirycznych na temat wpływu interesariuszy na litewskie organizacje gospodarcze w kwestii społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu. Teoretyczne ramy badania opierają się na narzędziu badawczym Międzynarodowy Barometr Środowiska Biznesu (IBEB) i obejmują siłę i rodzaje różnych interesariuszy, strategie organizacyjne relacje z nimi oraz skutki oddziaływania interesariuszy. Wyniki wykazały bardzo niewielki nacisk interesariuszy na organizacje biznesowe w kwestii społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

corporate social responsibility; CSR; stakeholders

PL

społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; CSR; interesariusze

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 1
• Strony: 18--29
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bakanauskiene I.

• Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Vytautas Magnus University

autor

Staniuliene S.

• Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Vytautas Magnus University

autor

Zirgutis V.

• Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Vytautas Magnus University

Bibliografia

• 1. Aguilera R., Rupp D.E., Williams C.A, Ganapathi J., 2007, Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations, “Academy of Management Review“, 32(3).
• 2. Antoni G.D., Portale E., 2011, The effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Social Capital creation in social cooperatives, “Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly“, 40(3).
• 3. Baughn C.C., Bodie N.L., McIntosh J.C., 2007, Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management“, 14(4).
• 4. Baumast A., 2000, Environmental Management in Europe. Results of E.B.E.B. 1997/98, IWOe Discussion Paper 79, Institute for Economy and the Environment at the University of St. Gallen.
• 5. Cepinskis J., Sakalauskaite E., 2009, Įmonių socialinė atsakomybė ekonominės krizės sąlygomis Lietuvoje, “Applied Economics: Systematic Research“, 3(1).
• 6. Chang K., Kim I., Li Y., 2014, The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders, “Bussiness Ethics“, 125.
• 7. Chernev A., Blair S., 2015, Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Journal of Consumer Research“, 41/April.
• 8. Freeman E., 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, NY: Basic Books.
• 9. Godfrey P.C., 2005, The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective, “Academy of Management Review“, 30(4).
• 10. Grundey D., 2008, Applying sustainability principles in the economy, “Technological and Economic Development of Economy“, 14(2).
• 11. Guzavicius A., Bruneckiene J., 2010, Economic interest groups social responsibility providing asymmetrical information, “Economics & Management“, 15.
• 12. Yin J., Zhang Y., 2012, Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China, “Journal of Business Ethics“, 111(2).
• 13. Khan A., Muttakin M.B., Siddiqui J., 2013, Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy, “Journal of Business Ethics“, 114(2).
• 14. Kot S., 2014, Knowledge and Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Journal of Advanced Research in Law & Economics”, 5(2).
• 15. Kot S., Brzeziński S., 2015, Market Orientation Factors in Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility, “Asian Journal of Applied Sciences”, 8(2).
• 16. Kotchen M.J., Moon J.J., 2011, Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility, Working paper, National bureau of economic research, Cambridge, available at, http://www.nber.org/papers/w17254, referred on 04/06/2013.
• 17. Lannelongue G., Gonzalez-Benito O., Gonzalez-Benito J., 2014, Environmental Motivations: The Pathway to Complete Environmental Management, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 124(1).
• 18. Lin C.H., Yang H.L., Liou D.H., 2009, The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: Evidence from Business in Taiwan, “Technology in Society“, 31(1).
• 19. McWilliams A., Siegel D., 2001, Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective, “The Academy of Management Review“, 26(1).
• 20. Mele D., 2008, Corporate social responsibility theories, [in:] A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D.S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• 21. Moon T.W., Hur W.M., Ko S.H., Kim J.W., Yoon S.W., 2014, Bridging corporate social responsibility and compassion at work: Relations to organizational justice and affective organizational commitment, “Career Development International“, 19(1).
• 22. Navickas V., Kontautiene R., 2013, The initiatives of corporate social responsibility as sources of innovations, “Business: Theory & Practice“, 14(1).
• 23. Nwabuzor A., 2005, Corruption and development: New initiatives in economic openness and strengthened rule of law, „Journal of Business Ethics“, 59.
• 24. OECD, 2011, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2011 edition. OECD Publ.
• 25. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L., 2003, Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis, “Organization studies“, 24(3).
• 26. Ramasamy B., Hung W.T., 2004, A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility awareness: Malaysian and Singaporean firms, “Journal of Corporate Citizenship“, 13.
• 27. Ruzevicius J., 2014, Socialinės atsakomybės šiuolaikinė sistema ir priemonės, Kvalitetas.
• 28. Simanskienė L., Pauzuoliene J., 2011, Perception of Sustainable Development Concept in Organizations, “Management Theory & Studies for Rural Business & Infrastructure Development”, 2.
• 29. Tabor J., Roman M., 2004, Social responsibility of small and medium enterprises, [In:] Technology & Economy in Industrial Reconversion”, (Eds.) M. Nowicka-Skowron, R. Lescroart, P. Pachura, Virton, Belgium.
• 30. Vveinhardt J., Andriukaitiene R., Cunha L.M., 2014, Social Capital as a Cause and Consequence of Corporate Social Responsibility, “Transformations in Business & Economics“, 13/2A (32A).
• 31. Waddock S.A., 2004, Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship, “Business and Society Review“, 109.
• 32. Wilson T., 2007, No, Really – What Are the ‘Equator Principles’? “The Institute of Public Affairs Review”, 59(2).

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.