PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Heuristic Procedure for the Assembly Line Balancing Problem With Postural Load Smoothness

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper presents a heuristic procedure for assigning assembly tasks to workstations where both productivity and ergonomics issues are considered concurrently. The procedure uses Kilbridge and Wester’s algorithm to obtain an initial task–workstation assignment solution which minimizes the balance delay of an assembly line. A task reassignment algorithm was applied to improve the initial solution by exchanging assembly tasks, which smooth postural load among workers, between workstations. A composite index of variation was used to measure the effectiveness of the task–workstation assignment solution. On the basis of clothes assembling, it was found that the task–workstation assignment solution with a minimum composite index of variation can be obtained with relatively equal weights in balance delay and postural load.
Rocznik
Strony
531--541
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Department of Production Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Engineering Management, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
autor
  • Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, USA
Bibliografia
  • 1.Shin D. An efficient heuristic for solving stochastic assembly line balancing problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1990;18(3):285–95.
  • 2.Nourie FJ, Venta ER. Finding optimal line balances with OptPack. Operation Research Letters. 1991;10(3):165–71.
  • 3.Park K, Park S, Kim W. A heuristic for an assembly line balancing problem with incompatibility, range, and partial precedence constraints. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1997;32(2):321–32.
  • 4.McMullen PR, Frazier GV. A heuristic for solving mixed-model line balancing problems with stochastic task durations and parallel stations. International Journal of Production Economics. 1997;51(3):177–90.
  • 5.Kim YJ, Kim YK, Cho Y. A heuristic-based genetic algorithm for workload smoothing in assembly lines. Computers and Operations Research. 1998;25(2):99–111.
  • 6.Sarin SC, Erel E, Dar-El EM. A methodology for solving single-model, stochastic assembly line balancing problems. Omega. 1999;27(5):525–35.
  • 7.Amen M. Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: a comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics. 2001;69(3):255–64.
  • 8.Jin M, Wu SD. A new heuristic method for mixed model assembly line balancing problem. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2003;44(1):159–69.
  • 9.Fleszar K, Hindi KS. An enumerative heuristic and reduction methods for the assembly line balancing problem. Euro J Oper Res. 2003;145(3):606–20.
  • 10.Rubinovitz J, Levitin G. Genetic algorithm for assembly line balancing. International Journal of Production Economics. 1995;41(1):343–54.
  • 11.Gen M, Tsujimura Y, Li Y. Fuzzy assembly line balancing using genetic algorithms. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1996;31(3–4):631–34.
  • 12.Kim YK, Kim YJ, Kim Y. Genetic algorithms for assembly line balancing with various objectives. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1996;30(3):397–409.
  • 13.Ponnambalam SG, Aravindan P, Mogileeswar Naidu G. A multi-objective genetic algorithm for solving assembly line balancing problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2000;16(5):341–52.
  • 14.Chen RS, Lu KY, Yu SC. A hybrid genetic algorithm approach on multi-objective of assembly planning problem. Eng App Artif Intelligence. 2002;15(5):447–57.
  • 15.Deckro RF, Rangachari S. A goal approach to assembly line balancing. Computer and Operations Research. 1990;17(5):509–21.
  • 16.Gokcen H, Erel E. A goal programming approach to mixed-model assembly line balancing problem. International Journal of Production Economics. 1997;48(2):177–85.
  • 17.Berger I, Bourjolly JM, Laporte G. Branchand-bound algorithms for the multi-product assembly line balancing problem. Euro J Oper Res. 1992;58(2):215–22.
  • 18.Klein R, Scholl A. Maximizing the production rate in simple assembly line balancing: a branch and bound procedure. Euro J Oper Res. 1996;91(2):367–85.
  • 19.Chow WM. Assembly line design: methodology and applications. New York, NY, USA: Dekker; 1990.
  • 20.Aaras A, Westgaard RH. Further studies of postural load and musculoskeletal injuries of workers at an electro-mechanical assembly plant. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):211–9.
  • 21.Eklund JAE. Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. Appl Ergon. 1995;26(1):15–20.
  • 22.Zetterberg C, Forsberg A, Hansson E, Johansson H, Nielsen P, Danielsson B, et al. Neck and upper extremity problems in car assembly workers. A comparison of subjective complaints, work satisfaction, physical examination and gender. Int J Ind Ergon. 1997;19(4):277–89.
  • 23.Zetterberg C, Ofverholm T. Carpal tunnel syndrome and other wrist/hand symptoms and signs in male and female car assembly workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;23(3):193–204.
  • 24.Engstrom T, Hanse JJ, Kadefors R. Musculoskeletal symptoms due to technical preconditions in long cycle time work in an automobile assembly plant: a study of prevalence and relation to psychosocial factors and physical exposure. Appl Ergon. 1999;30(5):443–53.
  • 25.Hakkanen M, Viikari-Juntura E, Takala EP. Effects of changes in work methods on musculoskeletal load: an intervention study in the trailer assembly. Appl Ergon. 1997;28(2):99–108.
  • 26.Fredriksson K, Bildt C, Hägg G, Kilbom A. The impact on musculoskeletal disorders of changing physical and psychosocial work environment conditions in the automobile industry. Int J Ind Ergon. 2001;28(1):31–45.
  • 27.Kilbridge M, Wester L. A heuristic method of assembly line balancing. Journal of Industrial Engineering. 1961;12(4):292–8.
  • 28.McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon. 1993;24(2):91–9.
  • 29.Jaturanonda C, Nanthavanij S. Heuristic procedure for two-criterion assembly line balancing problem. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems. 2006;5(2). Retrieved September 20, 2013, from: http://www.iemsjl.org/index.php?mid=ContentofPresentissue&category=2930&document_srl=4016.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f29671f3-8aa4-4f0b-a8f5-535895ddfb0d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.