The Theoretical Analysis Model and Statistical Test Research on Enterprises Development - A Study of Data from 195 Large and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in China

• Autorzy: Yin H. , Guo T. , Li B. , Zhu J. , Sun X.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Model analizy teoretycznej oraz badania statystyczne rozwoju przedsiębiorstw – analiza danych 195 dużych i średnich chińskich przedsiębiorstw produkcyjnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

On the basis of dynamic capabilities theory, this paper has put forward the theoretical analysis model and examined questionnaire data from 195 large and medium manufacturing enterprises in 2011 through statistical test methods including intermediary role term and SEM model. The results are as follows: first, in the test for basic constructs, the correlation of independent and dependent variables Sig. <0.001 and Pearson coefficient>0.500, all multiple correlation coefficient > 0.800, all determination coefficient R2 >0.650, Durbin-Watson coefficient approximated to 2.000, all check coefficient has presented distinct character, the whole regressive model explained variation achieved significant standard and all hypothesis have passed the statistical test. Secondly, during the tests for hypothesis with intermediary role term, the regressive coefficient intermediary variable was up to 0.723 and markedly different from 0(Sig. <0.001), the regressive coefficient of organization modularization, intellectual capital and knowledge resource were decreased respectively, determination coefficient R2 increased to 0.889 with significant higher explanation power. It shows that the regressive model with intermediary variable has influenced much on comprehensive regression effect and the hypothesis of intermediary role term have passed the statistical tests.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono analizę teoretyczną danych ze 195 dużych i średnich przedsiębiorstw produkcyjnych z 2011 roku. Wykorzystano do tego celu testy statystyczne, w tym model SEM. Zamieszczone wyniki pokazują, że zastosowany model regresyjny ze zmiennymi pośrednimi ma duży wpływ na ogólny efekt regresji. Analiza hipotezy o roli pośrednika, na podstawie dokonanych testów, okazała się prawdziwa.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

manufacturing enterprises; theoretical analysis model; statistical test; hypothesis; questionnaire

PL

przedsiębiorstwo produkcyjne; model teoretyczny analizy; badania statystyczne; hipoteza; kwestionariusz

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Elektrotechniczny
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: R. 89, nr 3b
• Strony: 198--206
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., schem., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Yin H.

• School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

autor

Guo T.

• School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

autor

Li B.

• School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

autor

Zhu J.

• School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

autor

Sun X.

• School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

Bibliografia

• [1] Wernerfelt B.A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1984, 5(2):171-180.
• [2] Dierickxi I, Cool K. Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science,1989,35(12):1504-1512.
• [3] Adner R,Helfat C E.Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,2003, 24(10):1011-1025.
• [4] Prahalad C K,Gary H.The Core Competence of the Corportion. 206 PRZEGLĄD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, ISSN 0033-2097, R. 89 NR 3b/2013 Harvard Business Review,1990, 68(3): 79-91.
• [5] Barton D L.Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal,1992, 13(2):111-125.
• [6] Kogut B,Zander U.Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replication of Technology.Organization Science,1992,3(3): 383-397.
• [7] Im S, Workman. Market orientation,creativity and new product performance in high technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68( 2): 114-132.
• [8] Teece D J,Pisano G,Shuen A.Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal,1997, 14(3):61-74.
• [9] Teece D J.Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of Enterprise Performance.Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(13):1319-1350.
• [10] Moliterno,Wiersema.Firm Performance,Rent Appro-priation and the Strategic Resource Divestment Capability.Strategic Management Journal,2007,28 (11): 1065-1087.
• [11] Eisenhardt K M,Martin M. Dynamic capabilities: What are they. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10):1105-1121.
• [12] Wiklund,Shepherd.Knowledge-based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Small and Mediumsized Businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(13): 1307-1314.
• [13] Pil F K, Cohen S K. Modularity: implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31 (4) : 995 -1011.
• [14] Wooten L. P., Crane P. Generating dynamic capabilities through a humanistic work ideology. American Behavioral Scientist, 2004, 47(6): 848-846.
• [15] Zahra S A.Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 2006,43(4):731-753.
• [16] Blyler M, Coff R W. Dynamic capabilities, social capital and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(7): 677- 686.
• [17] Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities development. Organization Science, 2009, 20(6): 599-617.
• [18] Gabriel Cepeda, Dusya Vera. Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 2007, 60(5): 426-437.
• [19] Mohr J, Nevin J R.Communication strategies in marketing channels:A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(3): 36-51.
• [20] Dewar R. D., Dutton J. E. The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science. 1986, 32(11): 1422-1433.
• [21] Youndt M A, Subramaniam M. A. Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 2004, 41: 335-362.
• [22] Bontis N. Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures and Models. Management Decision, 1998, 36(2):113-127.
• [23] Blyler M, Coff R W. Dynamic capabilities,social capital and rent appropriation:Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal,2003, 24(7):677-686.
• [24] Zhang G, Gao R. Modularity and Incremental Innovation: The Roles of Design Rules and Organizational Communication. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2010, 16(2): 171- 200.
• [25] Chul W. Moon. Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations.The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1998, 9(1): 35-53.
• [26] Henderson R M,Cockburn I.Measuring competence exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal,1994, 15(12):63-84.
• [27] Adner R, Helfat C E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(10): 1011-1025.
• [28] Justin J P, Jansen Frans A J,Van Den Bosch,Henk W Volberda. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance: Effects of organiza-tional antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science,2006,52 (11): 1661-1674.
• [29] Delmar et al. Arriving at the High Growth Firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 2003, 18 (2):189-216.
• [30] Gaylen N Chandler, Steven H. Hanks.Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study.Journal of Business Venturing, 1993, 8(5): 391-408.
• [31] Pugh, D. S., D. J. Hickson, etal.An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1973, 14:115- 126.
• [32] Dzinkowski. The measurement and management of Intellectual Capital: an introduction. Management Accounting, 2000, 78(2): 32-36.
• [33] Cohen,W. M., Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(3): 128- 152.
• [34] Chul W. Moon. Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations.The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1998, 9(1): 35-53.
• [35] Ambrosini V, Bowman C. What Are Dynamic Capabilities and Are They a Useful Constr uction Strategic Management? . International Journal of Management Reviews, 2009, 11(1): 29-49.
• [36] Ulrich Lichtenthaler. Leveraging Technology Assets in The Presence of Markets for Knowledge. European Management Journal, 2008 (26): 122-134.
• [37] Dunne P, Hughes A. Age, size, growth and survival UK companies in the 1980s. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1994, 42(2): 115- 140.
• [38] Gaylen N Chandler, Steven H. Hanks.Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study.Journal of Business Venturing, 1993, 8(5): 391-408.
• [39] Armstrong, J. S., Overton, T. S. Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1977, 14(7):396-402.