Exposure of Workers to Electromagnetic Fields. A Review of Open Questions on Exposure Assessment Techniques

• Autorzy: Mild K. H. , Alanko T. , Decat G. , Falsaperla R. , Gryz K. , Hietanen M. , Karpowicz J. , Rossi P. , Sandstrom M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

European Directive 2004/40/EC on occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF), based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, was to be implemented in the Member States of the European Union by 2008. Because of some unexpected problems the deadline was postponed until 2012. This paper reviews some of the problems identified and presents some suggestions for possible solutions based on the authors’ experience in assessing occupational exposure to EMF. Among the topics discussed are movement in static magnetic fields, ways to time average extreme low frequency signals, the difference between emission and exposure standards, and ways of dealing with those issues.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

occupational exposure; exposure assessment; measurements; numerical simulations; safety guidelines; EU directive; compliance testing; medical implants; health examination

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 15, No. 1
• Strony: 3--33
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Mild K. H.

• Department of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden

autor

Alanko T.

• Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki, Finland

autor

Decat G.

• Flemish Institute of Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium

autor

Falsaperla R.

• National Institute of Occupational Safety and Prevention (ISPESL), Rome, Italy

autor

Gryz K.

• Central Institute for Labour Protection – National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Poland

autor

Hietanen M.

• Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki, Finland

autor

Karpowicz J.

• Central Institute for Labour Protection – National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Poland

autor

Rossi P.

• National Institute of Occupational Safety and Prevention (ISPESL), Rome, Italy

autor

Sandstrom M.

• Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umea University, Umea, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1.International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74(4):494–522.
• 2.Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz (Standard No.C.95.1:2005). New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2005.
• 3.Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields, 0–3 kHz (Standard No. C.95.6:2002). New York, NY, USA: IEEE; 2002.
• 4.International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines on limits for exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys. 1994;66(1):100–6.
• 5.Hansson Mild K, B. Greenebaum. Environmental and occupationally encountered electromagnetic fields. In: Barnes FS, Greenebaum B, editors. Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields. 3rd ed. (Vol. 1. Bioengineering and biophysical aspects of electromagnetic fields). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2007. p. 1–34.
• 6.Hietanen M, Hansson Mild K, Karpowicz J. Exposure to electromagnetic fields in the work environment and basic measurement problems. In: Kostarakis P, editor. Biological Effect of EMFs. 3rd International Workshop. Proceedings. University of Ioannina and NCSR Demokritos; 2004. p. 1174–80.
• 7.Karpowicz J, Gryz K. Practical aspects of occupational EMF exposure assessment. Environmentalist. 2007;27:525–31.
• 8.Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields). OJ. 2004;L159:1–26.
• 9.International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment. Part 2. Particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis (Standard No. IEC-601-2-33:1995). Geneva, Switzerland: IEC; 1995.
• 10.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Medical electrical equipment. Part 2: particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis (Standard No. EN 60601-2-33:2002). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2002.
• 11.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Active implantable medical devices—part 2-1: particular requirements for active implantable medical devices intended to treat bradyarrhythmia (cardiac pacemakers) (Standard No. EN 45502-2-1:2003). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2003.
• 12.American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH). Threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH, USA: ACGIH; 2008.
• 13.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Active implantable medical devices—part 2-2: particular requirements for active implantable medical devices intended to treat tachyarrhythmia (includes implantable defibrillators). (Standard No. EN 45502-2-2:2008). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2008.
• 14.Reilly JP. Applied bioelectricity. From electrical stimulation to electropathology. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag. 1998.
• 15.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Basic standard for evaluation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields from equipment for resistance welding and allied processes (Standard No. prEN 50505:2007). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2007.
• 16.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Measurement methods for electromagnetic fields of household appliances and similar apparatus with regard to human exposure (Standard No. EN 62233:2008). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2008.
• 17.Estenberg U, Anger G, Trulsson J. Kartläggning av exponering for magnetfalt runt larmbagar och RFID-system (SSI Report No. 2006:3). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Radiation Protection Authority; 2006. With a summary in English. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from: http://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/Global/Publikationer/Rapport/Str%C3%A5lskydd/2006/ssi-rapp-2006-03.pdf.
• 18.Trulsson J, Anger G, Estenberg U. Assessment of magnetic fields surrounding electronic article surveillance systems in Sweden. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(8):664–6.
• 19.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Evaluation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields from devices used in electronic article surveillance (EAS), radio frequency identification (RFID) and similar applications (Standard No. EN 50357:2001). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2001.
• 20.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Basic standard for the evaluation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields from equipment for arc welding and allied process (Standard No. EN 50444:2008). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2008.
• 21.International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidance on determining compliance of exposure to pulsed fields and complex non-sinusoidal waveforms below 100 kHz with ICNIRP guidelines. Health Phys. 2003;84(3):383–7.
• 22.Karpowicz J, Gryz K. Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to a magnetic field from magnetic resonance imaging devices. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 2006;12(2):155–67.
• 23.Jokela K. Restricting exposure to pulsed and broadband magnetic fields. Health Phys. 2000;79(4):373–88.
• 24.Jokela K. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution. Health Phys. 2007;92(6):531–40.
• 25.Koradecka D, Pośniak M, Jankowska E, Skowroń J, Karpowicz J. Chemical, dust, biological and electromagnetic radiation hazards. In: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley; 2006. p. 945–64.
• 26.Corrigendum to Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). OJ. 2004;L184:1–9.
• 27.Wilen J, Hornsten R, Sandstrom M, Bjerle P, Wiklund U, Stensson O, Lyskov E, Hansson Mild K. Electromagnetic field exposure and health among RF plastic sealer operators. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25:5–15.
• 28.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Limitation of human exposure to electromagnetic fields from devices operating in the frequency range 0 Hz to 10 GHz, used in Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and similar applications (Standard No. EN 50364:2001). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2001.
• 29.Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Molenda M, Zradziński P. Numerical simulations of EMF from dielectric heaters and comparative analysis of Directive 2004/40/EC and occupational regulation in Poland. In: Proceedings of 18th International Wrocław Symposium and Exhibition on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Wrocław, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej; 2006. p. 95–9.
• 30.Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny (PKN). Labour protection in electromagnetic fields and radiation of the frequency range from 0 Hz to 300 GHz. Part 1. Terminology. Part 3. Methods of measurements and evaluation of field on the work stands (Standard No. PN-T-06580:2002). Warszawa, Poland: PKN; 2002. In Polish.
• 31.Sandrini L, Vaccari A, Malacarne C, Cristoforetti L, Pontalti R. RF dosimetry: a comparison between power absorption of female and male numerical models from 0.1 to 4 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:5185–201.
• 32.Findlay RP, Dimbylow PJ. Effects of posture on FDTD calculations of specific absorption rate in a voxel model of the human body. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:3825–35.
• 33.Alanko T, Hietanen M. Occupational exposure to RF fields in antenna towers. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;123:537–9.
• 34.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1993.
• 35.Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). OJ. 2003;L42.
• 36.World Health Organization (WHO), Framework for developing health-based EMF standards. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2006. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/standards/EMF_standards_framework%5b1%5d.pdf.
• 37.European Commission. Employment and Social Affairs DG. Standardisation mandate addressed to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI to develop harmonised standards for the assessment, measurement and calculation of workers’ exposure to static magnetic and varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields with frequencies from 0 Hz to 300 GHz (EMPL/D-4/AF/D(2004); M/351); Luxembourg, 17 May 2004. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/standards_policy/mandates/database/index.cfm?fuseaction=search.detail&id=229#.
• 38.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Procedure for the assessment of the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields (Standard prEN 50499:2008). Brussels, Belgium; CENELEC; 2008.
• 39.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Household and similar electrical appliances—electromagnetic fields—methods for evaluation and measurement (Standard No. EN 50366:2003). Brussels, Belgium; CENELEC; 2003.
• 40.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of mobile phones with the basic restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (300 MHz–3 GHz) (Standard No. EN 50360:2001). Brussels, Belgium; CENELEC; 2001.
• 41.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of radio base stations and fixed terminal stations for wireless telecommunication systems with the basic restrictions or the reference levels related to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (110 MHz–40 GHz)—occupational (Standard No. EN 50384:2002). Brussels, Belgium; CENELEC; 2002.
• 42.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of radio base stations and fixed terminal stations for wireless telecommunication systems with the basic restrictions or the reference levels related to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (110 MHz–40 GHz)—general public (Standard No. EN 50385:2002), Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2002.
• 43.LAB34. The expression of uncertainty in EMC testing. Feltham, Middlesex, United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS); 2002. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from: http://www.ukas.com/Library/downloads/publications/Lab34.pdf.
• 44.European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Generic standard to demonstrate the compliance of electronic and electrical apparatus with the basic restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz–300 GHz) (Standard No. EN 50392:2004). Brussels, Belgium: CENELEC; 2004.
• 45.Italian National Electrotechnical Committee (CEI). Guide for the measurement and the evaluation of electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 10 kHz–300 GHz, with reference to the human exposure (Standard No. CEI 211-7:2001). Milan, Italy: CEI; 2001. In Italian.
• 46.Bahr A, Boltz T, Hennes C. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines. Health Phys. 2007;92(6):521–30.
• 47.EMF-NET. Sixth Framework Programme. Recommendations on engineering requirements/aspects for experimental research in bioelectromagnetics. Recommendations on quality assurance in bioelectromagnetics research (Project No. SSPE-CT-2004-502173); 2006. Retrieved November 15, 2008, from: http://web.jrc.ec.europa.eu/emf-net/doc/Reports/Report%20on%20Reccomendation%20in%20Bioelectromagnetcs%20Aug2006.pdf.
• 48.Hocking B, Hansson Mild K. Guidance note: risk management of workers with medical electronic devices and metallic implants in electromagnetic fields. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE). 2008;14(2):217–22.
• 49.Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C, Altamura G, Ammirati F, Santini M. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? PACE. 1995;18:1218–24.
• 50.Hietanen M, Sibakov V. Electromagnetic interference from GSM and TETRA phones with life-support medical devices. Annals of Italian Institute of Health. 2007;43(3):204–7.
• 51.Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices. OJ. 1990;L189:17–36.
• 52.Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 90/385/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices, Council Directive 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices and Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. OJ. 2007;L247:21–55.
• 53.Council of the European Union Recommendation of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz), 1999/519/EC. OJ. 1999:L199:59–70.
• 54.Karpowicz J, Hietanen M, Gryz K. Occupational risk from static magnetic fields of MRI scanners. Environmentalist. 2007;27:533–8.
• 55.Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits (codified version). OJ. 2006;L374:10–9.
• 56.Directive 2004/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility and repealing Directive 89/336/EEC. OJ. 2004;L390:24–37.