Technology assessment systems

• Autorzy: Poteralska B.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Systemy oceny technologii

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Technology assessment is one of key challenges in innovation management concerning support for the decision-making processes with regard to the importance, development, and implementation of technologies. The article presents a literature review concerning the term “technology assessment” and methods and models applied in this field. Against this background, an original complex technology assessment system that was developed and verified at the Institute for Sustainable Technologies – National Research Institute in Radom, Poland is presented.

PL

Ocena technologii stanowi jedno z kluczowych wyzwań zarządzania innowacjami w zakresie wspomagania procesów decyzyjnych dotyczących znaczenia i rozwoju technologii. W artykule przeprowadzono analizę pojęciową terminu „ocena technologii” oraz zaprezentowano przegląd stosowanych w tym zakresie metod i modeli. Na tym tle przedstawiono oryginalny system kompleksowej oceny technologii opracowany i zweryfikowany w Instytucie Technologii Eksploatacji – Państwowym Instytucie Badawczym w Radomiu.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

technology assessment; technological innovative solutions; complex technology assessment system; implementation maturity level assessment; commercial potential assessment; innovativeness level assessment; implementation risk assessment

PL

ocena technologii; innowacyjne rozwiązania techniczne; system kompleksowej oceny technologii; ocena poziomu dojrzałości wdrożeniowej; ocena potencjału komercyjnego; ocena poziomu innowacyjności; ocena ryzyka wdrożeniowego

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu Technologii Eksploatacji - Państwowego Instytutu Badawczego
• Czasopismo: Problemy Eksploatacji
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 4
• Strony: 93--102
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Poteralska B.

• Institute for Sustainable Technologies – National Research Institute

Bibliografia

• 1. Azzone G., Manzinib R.: Quick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research Centre, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 75, Issue 8, October 2008, pp. 1324–1338.
• 2. Coates J.: A 21st Century Agenda for Technology Assessment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 67, 303–308 (2001), Elsevier Science, Inc.
• 3. Van Den Ende J., Mulder K., Knot M., Moors E., Vergragt P.: Traditional and Modern Technology Assessment: Toward a Toolkit, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 58, Issues 1–2, May–June 1998, pp. 5–21.
• 4. Tran T., Daim T.: A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 75, 2008, pp. 1396–1405.
• 5. Jong-Hyun H.: Exploratory study for integrated green technology assessment: focusing on renewable energy and photovoltaic data, Department of Management Engineering, KAIST, 2013, http://library.kaist.ac.kr/thesis02/2013/2013M020113684_S1Ver2.pdf, acc. 20.01.2014.
• 6. Decker M., Ladikas M. (eds.): Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment – Methods and Impacts. Springer, Germany 2004.
• 7. Coates J.: Future and Technology Assessment Research for Business Clients, The inaugural meeting at the Center for Impact Assessment Studies and Forecasting, October 2001, www.josephcoates.com.
• 8. Fleischer T., Decker M., Fiedeler U.: Assessing emerging technologies – Methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 72, Issue 9, November 2005, Pages 1112–1121, New Horizons and Challenges for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: The 2004 EU-US Seminar.
• 9. Lucheng H., Xin L., Wenguang L., Research on emerging technology selection and assessment by technology foresight and fuzzy consistent matrix, Foresight, 2010, nr 12, 2.
• 10. Mankins, J.C.: Technology Readiness Levels: a white paper, NASA, Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology, 1995.
• 11. NASA, Commercialization Readiness Level Assessment Index, Technology Commercialization Process, Change 1 (4/9/04), 2004.
• 12. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B.: System of a complex assessment
• of technological innovative solutions. Problemy Eksploatacji, ITeE – PIB, Radom, No 4/2012.
• 13. McGrath R.G., MacMillan I.C.: Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning, Res. Technol. Manag, July-August 2000, pp. 35–49.
• 14. Ordoobadi S.M., Mulvaney N.J.: Development of a justification tool
• for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 18, issue 2, 2001, pp. 157–184.
• 15. Palm E., Hansson S.O.: The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA), Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2006, nr 73.
• 16. Jolly, D.R.: Chinese vs. European views regarding technology assessment: Convergent or divergent? Technovation, 2008, nr 28.
• 17. Shen Y.-Ch., Lin G.T.R., Tzeng G.-H.: Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, nr 38.
• 18. Chen, Ch.-J., Chung, M.-Ch., Wei, Ch.-H.: Government policy of technology selection for advanced traveler information systems, R&D Management, 2006, nr 36, 4, pp. 439–450.
• 19. Klincewicz K., Manikowski A.: Ocena, rankingowanie i selekcja technologii, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa, 2013, pp. 204.
• 20. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B.: Problems of Development and Practical Implementation of Innovative Technological Solutions, The Proceedings of the 6th ISPIM Innovation Symposium – Innovation in the Asian Century, Melbourne, Australia, 2013.
• 21. Mazurkiewicz, A., Karsznia, W., Giesko, T., Belina, B.: Metodyka oceny stopnia dojrzałości wdrożeniowej innowacji technicznych, Problemy Eksploatacji, 1/2010, ITeE-PIB, Radom.
• 22. Belina B., Giesko T., Łopacińska L., Walasik M.: Setting of criteria in the commercial potential assessment method of innovative technological solutions, Problemy Eksploatacji 2/2013 pp. 221–234.