Innovation capacity, international experience, and export performance of SMEs in the field of Information technology of Vietnam

• Autorzy: Huy Nguyen Quoc , Ngoc Tran Hau

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15439/2022M7956

• Konferencja: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Research in Management & Technovation
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Although there are many assessments of the innovation capacity of enterprises, there is still a lack of assessment of the innovation capacity of small and medium enterprises in the information technology sector related to the 4th industrial revolution. The structure must be determined from a practical point of view using existing innovation capacity studies. Therefore, this study aims to improve understanding of the characteristics of innovation capacity in the context of small and medium enterprises in the field of information technology by reviewing the empirical literature. This article presents international experiences, assessment models, and the applicability of models to the characteristics of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of information technology. With the main contribution, the article identifies an overview of growing research around the world on innovation capacity and lessons learned for small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. The research results will contribute to improving understanding of the special characteristics of the innovation capacity of small and medium enterprises in the field of information technology and especially in the context of the 4th industrial revolution. The described innovation capacity characterization can guide further studies by providing criteria for how innovation capacity in small businesses can be understood. Furthermore, using the findings of this assessment, managers can improve the innovation capacity of their businesses by acknowledging many aspects of innovation capacity

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation capability; systematic review; innovation performance; performance management; SME

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne
• Czasopismo: Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 34
• Strony: 7--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Huy Nguyen Quoc

• Faculty of Information Technology, Hanoi University of Architecture, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi City, Vietnam

autor

Ngoc Tran Hau

• Vietnam Centre for Science and Technology Evaluation, Ministry of Science and Technology, Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi City, Vietnam

Bibliografia

• 1. M. Saunila, “Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 260-265, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.11.002.
• 2. M. M. Oura, S. N. Zilber, and E. L. Lopes, “Innovation capacity, international experience and export performance of SMEs in Brazil,” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 921-932, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.12.002.
• 3. D. A. de J. Pacheco, C. S. ten Caten, C. F. Jung, J. L. D. Ribeiro, H. V. G. Navas, and V. A. Cruz-Machado, “Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 142, pp. 2277-2287, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049.
• 4. D. R. Shaw and T. Allen, “Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, pp. 88-102, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.030.
• 5. OECD/Eurostat (2019), “Measuring business capabilities for innovation”, in Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg.
• 6. D. D. T. Pham, P. Paillé, and N. Halilem, “Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 211, pp. 1088-1099, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221.
• 7. E. Costa, A. L. Soares, and J. P. De Sousa, “Information, knowledge and collaboration management in the internationalization of SMEs: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 557-569, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.007.
• 8. F. Rossi, A. Caloffi, A. Colovic, and M. Russo, “New business models for public innovation intermediaries supporting emerging innovation systems: The case of the Internet of Things,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 175, no. July 2020, p. 121357, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121357.
• 9. C. Lee and J. Hwang, “The influence of giant platform on content diversity,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, pp. 157-165, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.029.
• 10. D. Jugend, P. D. C. Fiorini, F. Armellini, and A. G. Ferrari, “Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 156, no. December 2019, p. 119985, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119985.
• 11. D. D. T. Pham, P. Paillé, and N. Halilem, “Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 211, pp. 1088-1099, 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.221.
• 12. M. G. Russell and N. V. Smorodinskaya, “Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no. February, pp. 114-131, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024.
• 13. Y. S. Su, Y. Kajikawa, M. Tsujimoto, and J. Chen, “Innovation ecosystems: Theory, evidence, practice, and implications,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no. September, pp. 14-17, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.009.
• 14. S. Mamonov and R. Peterson, “The role of IT in organizational innovation - A systematic literature review,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 30, no. 4, p. 101696, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101696.
• 15. J. Luo, “Architecture and evolvability of innovation ecosystems,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change,vol. 136, no. June 2017, pp. 132-144, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.033.
• 16. A. Mardani, D. Kannan, R. E. Hooker, S. Ozkul, M. Alrasheedi, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 249, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119383.
• 17. N. Zahoor and O. Al-Tabbaa, “Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions,” Scand. J. Manag., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 101109, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101109.
• 18. M. L. Moore, S. von der Porten, R. Plummer, O. Brandes, and J. Baird, “Water policy reform and innovation: A systematic review,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 38, pp. 263-271, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.007.
• 19. B. Walrave, M. Talmar, K. S. Podoynitsyna, A. G. L. Romme, and G. P. J. Verbong, “A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 136, no. September 2015, pp. 103-113, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011.
• 20. D. Vrontis and M. Christofi, “R&D internationalization and innovation: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research directions,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 128, no. December 2018, pp. 812-823, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.031.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).