PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The perception of the municipal housing manager’s CSR activities in the context of its stakeholders

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The growing complexity of the environment in which they operate causes modern enterprises, including various types of organizations, to develop competitive management models aimed at meeting the expectations of various groups of stakeholders involved in their activitiesin the long-term perspective. This article focuses on the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the activities of the municipal housing manager in the context of its stakeholders. The study examines how stakeholders (employees, resource residents, entrepreneurs) perceive the city's housing manager's CSR activities. Design/methodology/approach: In this study, in addition to the analysis of the literature on the subject, the results of the survey conducted in the first and second quarter of 2022 among 363 stakeholders of the municipal housing manager were used. In the study, the impartiality test χ2 and the coefficient of T Czuprow convergence were used, with the significance level α = 0.05. Findings: The results suggest that each of the three selected groups of stakeholders perceive the necessity of CSR activities differently. The group that is the most interested in such activities are employees, the inhabitants of resources expect only actions aiming to improve the quality of their lives, and therefore actions within the aspect of local responsibility. Entrepreneurs in turn, are interested in activities in the social, external and environmental aspects. In addition, the results of these studies may contribute to the state of knowledge in the scientific literature by pointing to the importance of CSR activities by entities not focused on maximizing profits. Originality/value: It can be expected that the developed models will help decision makers of city housing managers to gain a perception of the stakeholder's awareness of and attitudes towards the CSR concept.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
487--498
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 41 poz.
Twórcy
  • The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology
  • The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology
Bibliografia
  • 1. Anlesinya, A. and Abugre, J. (2021). Strategic CSR practices, strategic orientation andbusiness value creation among multinational subsidiaries in Ghana. Society and Business Review.
  • 2. Banerjee, S., and Wathieu, L. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and product quality:Complements or substitutes? International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, 734-745.
  • 3. Barić, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholders: review of the last decade (2006-2015). Bus. Syst. Res., 8, 133.
  • 4. Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, D. and Sen, S. (2008). Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257-272.
  • 5. Borowska-Żywno, A. (2018). Innowacje społecznie odpowiedzialne, społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu – wyzwania, dylematy, trendy. Marketing i Rynek, No. 11, 49-55.
  • 6. Bylok, F. (2005). Wzór sukcesu w społeczeństwie polskim w okresie transformacji społeczno-ustrojowej. Annales, 8(1), pp. 87-96.
  • 7. Correia, M.S. (2019), Sustainability: An Overview of the Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability Implementation. International Journal of Strategic Engineering, Vol. 2(1).
  • 8. Delmas, M.A. and Toffel, M.W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
  • 9. Dziadkiewicz, M, Cichowski, P. (2018). Participation of tenants and the quality of management services of communal apartments. European Journal of Service Management 26, 61-69.
  • 10. Dziadkiewicz, M. (2014). Centre of Social Integration as a tool of professional reintegration of the permanently unemployed in Czestochowa. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 23-33.
  • 11. Ellemers, N. and Chopova, T. (2022). The social responsibility of organizations: Perceptions of organizational morality as a key mechanism explaining the relation between CSR activities and stakeholder support. Research in Organizational Behavior. Available online, 2.02.2022, 100156.
  • 12. Kabus, J. (2017). External Stakeholders in Higher Education Governance. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, nr 9(812), pp. 32-41.
  • 13. Kang, B. (2014), Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions and Corporate Performances.Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 14, iss. 21, pp. 2662-2673.
  • 14. Khuong, M.N., Truong, N.K. and Hang, T.T. (2021). Stakeholders and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programme as key sustainable development strategies to promote corporate reputation—evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 8, 1, 1917333.
  • 15. Kucharska, W., and Kowalczyk, R. (2019). How to achieve sustainability?—Employee's point of view on company's culture and CSR practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 45.
  • 16. Kuraszko, I., (2010). Nowa komunikacja społeczna wyzwaniem odpowiedzialnego biznesu. Warszawa: Difin.
  • 17. Macassa G., Francisco, J.C., and McGrath, C. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and population health. Health Science Journal, 11, 528.
  • 18. McAdam, R., and Leonard, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in a total quality management context: Opportunities for sustainable growth. Corporate Governance, 3(4), 36-45.
  • 19. Mele, D. (2009). Business Ethics in Action. Seeking Human Excellence in Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 20. Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. and Harris, K.E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45-72.
  • 21. Mona, H.T. Saleh, Ebeid, A.Y. and Abdelhameed, T.A. (2015). Customers’ perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): its impact on word-of-mouth and retention. Innovative Marketing, 11(2), 49-55.
  • 22. Nadanyiova, M. (2021). The perception of corporate social responsibility and its impact on consumer buying behaviour in the process of globalization. SHS Web of Conferences, 92, 06024.
  • 23. Olejniczak-Szuster, K. (2021). Przedsiębiorca społecznie odpowiedzialny: motywy strategie działania w dobie pandemii COVID-19, Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej.
  • 24. Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm. Policy. Ment. Health., 42(5), 533-44.
  • 25. Polonsky, M.T. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340-363
  • 26. Porter, M.E., and Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
  • 27. Post, J.E., Lee, E.P., and Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28.
  • 28. Ratajczak, M. (2016). Knowledge of the concept of corporate social responsibility in agribusiness enterprises (based on the example of the SME sector in Malopolska). Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, 337-351.
  • 29. Sacconi, L.A. (2006). Social contract account for CSR as extended model of corporate governance (I): Rational bargaining and justification. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 259-281.
  • 30. Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163-1.
  • 31. Skiba, Ł. (2021). Managing Employee Engagement in the Reality of Organisational Changes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(1), pp. 354-372.
  • 32. Song, H., Lin, W., Lin, Y., Wolf, A.B., Neggers, R., Donner, L.J., Del Genio, A.D., and Liu, Y. (2013). Evaluation of precipitation simulated by seven SCMs against the ARM observation at the SGP site. J. Climate, 26, 5467-5492.
  • 33. Story, J. and Neves, P. (2015), When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: Exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 111-124.
  • 34. Tang, Z., & Tang, J. (2018). Stakeholder corporate social responsibility orientation congruence, entrepreneurial orientation and environmental performance of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 634-651.
  • 35. Tomaselli, G., Garg, L., Gupta, V., Xuereb, P.A., and Buttigieg, S.C. (2018) Corporate social responsibility communication research: state of the art and recent advances. In: D. Saha D. (ed.), Advances in Data Communications and Networking for Digital Business Transformation, Chapter 9 (pp. 272-305). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • 36. Ullah, S., Jamali, D. and Harwood, I.A. (2014). Socially responsible investment: Insights from Shari'a departments in Islamic financial institutions. Bus. Ethics: Eur. Rev., 23, 218-233.
  • 37. Watson, R., Wilson, H.N., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E.K. (2018). Harnessing difference: A capability-based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 254-279.
  • 38. Yu, J., Lo, C.W.-H., & Li, P.H.Y. (2017). Organizational visibility, stakeholder environmental pressure and corporate environmental responsiveness in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 371-384.
  • 39. Yu, Y., and Choi, Y. (2016). Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: The mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. The Social Science Journal, 53, 226-235.
  • 40. Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., and Andriukaitienė, R. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility as the Organization’s Commitment against Stakeholders. London: IntechOpen.
  • 41. Zukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitienė, R. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility as the Organization’s Commitment against Stakeholders.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f228340a-698e-4dcd-ba93-275401b7d462
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.