Numerical Investigation of Square Footing Positioned on Geocell Reinforced Sand by using ABAQUS Software

• Autorzy: Juneja Gaurav , Sharma Ravi Kumar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ceer-2022-0024

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The usage of geocell reinforcement for foundations supported on weak soil has been increased these days. The purposed study uses FEM-based ABAQUS software to analyse the behaviour of square footing supported on geocell reinforced sands subjected to static vertical loading. Numerical analysis was performed to find the optimum combination of the different geometric parameters of the geocell reinforcement. Three distinct types of sands were employed in the study with relative densities of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The geometric parameters of the geocell, such as the placement depth of geocell (u), the width (b), and the height (h) of the geocell, were modified in relation to the footing width (B) to access the optimum combination ratios. The inclusion of the geocell reinforcement increases the load-carrying capacity up to 5-6 times compared to unreinforced sand. The results obtained from the numerical analysis were intended to correlate well with the experimental data available in the literature.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

square footing; geocell reinforcement; weak soil; numerical investigation; MES; ABAQUS software

PL

ława fundamentowa; zbrojenie; słabe grunty; badania numeryczne; MES; ABAQUS

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 32, no. 2
• Strony: 154--173
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Juneja Gaurav

• Civil Engineering Department, NIT Hamirpur (HP), India

autor

Sharma Ravi Kumar

• Civil Engineering Department, NIT Hamirpur (HP), India

Bibliografia

• 1. Nazir, AK and Azzam, WR 2010. Improving the bearing capacity of footing on soft clay with sand pile with/without skirts. Alexandria Engineering Journal 4, 371–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2010.06.002.
• 2. El Wakil, AZ 2010. Horizontal capacity of skirted circular shallow footings on sand. Alexandria Engineering Journal 49, 379–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2010.07.003.
• 3. Khatri, VN et al. 2019. Numerical study on the uplift capacity of under-reamed piles in clay with linearly increasing cohession. International journal of geotechnical engineering 1-12.
• 4. Sitharam, TG et al. 2005. Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42, 693–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-117.
• 5. Shukla, SK 2012. Handbook of geosynthetic engineering, Landon: ICE Publications.
• 6. Dash, SK et al. 2003. Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 21, 197–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00017-7.
• 7. Dash, SK et al. 2007. Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 44, 905–916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-035.
• 8. Sireesh, S et al. 2009. Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27, 89–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.005.
• 9. Hegde, A and Sitharam, TG 2017. Joint Strength and Wall Deformation Characteristics of a Single-Cell Geocell Subjected to Uniaxial Compression. International Journal of Geomechanics 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000433.
• 10. Sherin, KS et al. 2017. Effect of Geocell Geometry and Multi-layer System on the Performance of Geocell Reinforced Sand Under a Square Footing. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 3, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0097-3.
• 11. Dehkordi, PF et al. 2021. Bearing capacity-relative density behavior of circular footings resting on geocell-reinforced sand. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1884901.
• 12. Muthukumar, S et al. 2019. Performance Assessment of Square Footing on Jute Geocell-Reinforced Sand, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 5, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0176-8.
• 13. Latha, GM and Murthy, VS 2007. Effects of reinforcement form on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 25, 23–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.002.
• 14. Hegde, A and Sitharam, TG 2013. Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 7, 346–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000043.
• 15. Mehdipour, I et al. 2013. Numerical study on stability analysis of geocell reinforced slopes by considering the bending effect. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 37, 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.01.001.
• 16. Yang, X et al. 2012. Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocell-reinforced sand bases. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 32, 95–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.10.004.
• 17. Yünkül, K et al. 2021. Numerical Analysis of Geocell Reinforced Square Shallow Horizontal Plate Anchor. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 39, 3081-3099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01679-1.
• 18. Dehkordi, PF et al. 2019. Effect of geocell-reinforced sand base on bearing capacity of twin circular footings. Geosynthetics International 26, 224-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.19.00047.
• 19. Astaraki, F et al. 2022. Effect of Geocell, on the Mechanical Behavior of Railway Embankments, Using FE Modeling. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 19(6).
• 20. Jayanthi, V. et al. 2022. Influencing Parameters on experimental and theoretical analysis of geocell reinforced soil. Materials Today: Proceedings.
• 21. Anusha Raj, K et al. 2022. Critical Overview of Reinforcing Sand Using Geocell for Shallow Foundation. Advances in Construction Materials and Sustainable Environment, 271-280.
• 22. Sharma, M, Inti, S, Tirado, C and Tandon, V 2016, Evaluating the benefits of geocell reinforcement of the base course in flexible pavement structures using 3-d finite element modeling. International Conference on Transportation and Development.
• 23. Biabani, MM et al. 2016. Modelling of geocell-reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 44, 489–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.02.001.
• 24. Fattah, MY et al. 2018. Behavior of flexible buried pipes under geocell reinforced subbase subjected to repeated loading. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering 9, 22–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGEE.2018010102.
• 25. Satyal, SR et al. 2018. Use of cellular confinement for improved railway performance on soft subgradese. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 46, 190–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.11.006.
• 26. Ari, A and Misir, G 2021. Three-dimensional numerical analysis of geocell reinforced shell foundations. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 49, 963–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.006.
• 27. Zhang, L et al. 2010. Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28, 475–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011.
• 28. Neto, JOA 2019. Application of the two-layer system theory to calculate the settlements and vertical stress propagation in soil reinforcement with geocell. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 47, 32–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.003.
• 29. Acharyya, R and Dey, A 2017. Finite Element Investigation of the Bearing Capacity of Square Footings Resting on Sloping Ground. INAE Letters 2, 97–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-017-0028-6.
• 30. Hegde, A and Sitharam TG 2008. 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotextiles and Geomembrane 43, 171-181. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.
• 31. Bolton, MD 1986. The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36, 65–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.1.65.
• 32. Bowles JE 1977. Foundation analysis and design. New York: McGraw- Hill.
• 33. Kulhawy, FH and Mayne, PW 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. United States: Geotechnical Engineering Group.