Cluster analysis of existing technoparks in developed countries

• Autorzy: Shaidurova Natalia , Prajova Vanessa , Smirnov Vitaliy , Livenskaya Galina

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2021-0037

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article provides a cluster analysis of existing technoparks, the sample of which was built according to the completeness of the data presented on the official websites of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation and the terms of operation. The analysis is carried out in order to determine the best components of the effectiveness of the development of the technopark movement in Russia. According to the analysis of this article, we can talk about a weak relationship between the three sub-indices: the activities of the management company, the activities of residents, the activities of regional authorities. The obtained data can serve as a starting base for further construction of an econometric model of the efficiency factors of technoparks.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

technopark; effectiveness of technoparks; evaluation criteria technoparks; regional economy; innovations; cluster model

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 4 (29)
• Strony: 294--301
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Shaidurova Natalia

• Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University Department of Economics and Organization of Production 1 Shuvalov str., Votkinsk, 427433, Russia

autor

Prajova Vanessa

• Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Slovak Republic

autor

Smirnov Vitaliy

• Kalashnikov Izhevsk State Technical University Department of Mechanical Engineering and Instrument Engineering Technology 1 Shuvalov str., Votkinsk, 427433, Russia

autor

Livenskaya Galina

• Branch of Udmurt State University in Votkinsk Department of Economics, Management and Law 1 Raskova str., Votkinsk, 427433, Russia

Bibliografia

• [1] A. Albahari, А. Barge-Gil, S. Perez-Canto, S. Modrego-Rico, A. The Influence of Science and Technology Park Characteristics on Firms’ Innovation Results. MRPA Paper 49227, University Library of Munich, Germany. 2013
• [2] V. Bogers, J. West. Strategic Utilization of Open and User Innovation//Creativity and Innovation Management, In: Managing Distributed Innovation, 21 (1), 2012. pp. 61-75.
• [3] N. Bozo, A. Diner. The ecosystem of Russian technoparks: the issues of creation and development. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Economy, 1(33), 2016, pp. 105- 115.
• [4] A. R. Datta, L. Jessup. Factors Affecting the Governance of Innovation Commercialization: A Theoretical Model//Journal of Business and Management, 18 (1), 2012, pp. 31-59.
• [5] Federal Law of the Russian Federation Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation (with amendments as of August 2, 2019). Access mode: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420242984
• [6] R. Gost: 56425-2015 National standard of the Russian Federation technoparks Requirements. Pre-stop mode: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200121795
• [7] G. Kostyunina, V. Baranov. Technoparks in foreign and Russian practice. Bulletin of MGIMO, 3, 2012, pp. 91-99.
• [8] N. Lytaeva, V. Lipatnikov. Success factors of Russian technoparks: an econometric model Innovative economy, 4, 2018, pp. 85-95.
• [9] Materials on the results of the online seminar of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia and AKIT: "Industrial technoparks: mechanisms of state support and federal requirements" (25.02.2021) https://akitrf.ru/technoparks/analiticheskie-materialy/
• [10] Zh. Mingaleva, N. Shaidurova. Interaction of state and local authorities in the creation and development of tehnology parks. Ars Administrandi, 9(2), 2017, pp. 176-194.
• [11] N. Rosenbush, J. Brinckman, A. Bausch. Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs//Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (4), 2011, pp. 441-457.
• [12] P. Sobkowic. The role of science and technology parks in communication processes between research institutions and industry//Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych, 4 (10), 2013, pp. 2-18.
• [13] R. Schroll, J. Janot, B. Král, I. Králiček. Managerial accounting in market economy companies. Praha, VŠE 2003, pp. 67-88.
• [14] R. Šlosár, A. Šlosárová. Double entry accounting for entrepreneurs. Bartislava, Ekonómia 2005, pp. 52-69.
• [15] J. Hilmar, J. Vollmuth. Controlling – new management tool. Praha, Profess Consulting 2009, pp. 124-143.
• [16] R. Hardt. Kostenmanagement: Instrumente und Methoden. München, Oldenbourg-Verlag 2007, pp. 40-86.
• [17] The comprehensive program "Creation of technoparks in the field of high technologies in the Russian Federation". Access mode: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901971445 [18] K. Kaszasová, I. Paule. Auditing. Bratislava, Súvaha 2005, pp. 28-54.
• [19] J. Kemmetmueller, S. Bogenberger. Handbuch der Kosterechnung, WUV Wien 2010, pp.125-137.
• [20] A. Kumar, P.K. Jain, P.M. Pathak. Reverse Engineering in Product Manufacturing: An Overview. DAAAM International Scientific Book, 2013, pp. 665-679.
• [21] M. Paulic, T. Irgolic, J. Balic, F. Cus, A. Cupar, T. Brajlih, I. Drstvensek. Reverse Engineering of Parts with Optical Scanning and Additive Manufacturing, Procedia Engineering, Volume 69, 2014, pp. 795-803
• [22] I. Matyushchenko, E. Zvereva, T. Lavina, Development of Algorithmic Thinking by Means of Lego Mindstorms Ev3 on Robotics. In: Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT). 2020, pp. 444-447
• [23] O. Cordón, F. Gomide, F. Herrera, F. Hoffmann, L. Magdalena. Ten years of genetic fuzy systems: current framework and new trends. Fuzzy sets and systems, 2004, pp. 141, 5- 31
• [24] T. Zavyalova, A. Andreeva. Mechanisms for the development of technoparks as a tool for the transfer of innovative technologies. Economic sciences, 2(183), 2020, pp. 44- 50.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).