Research of risk taking and deviations from rules at an open pit mine in Serbia

• Autorzy: Kirin Snezana , Miljanovic Igor , Brzakovic Miodrag , Trisovic Natasa

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1899-6116.2020.50.4

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction/background: The paper pointed out the main elements of the human risk factor procedures shows the complexity of human risk factor management. Aim of the paper: The aim of this paper is to analyze the human risk factor in open pit mining, especially on compliance with safety rules and regulations. Materials and methods: The presented survey, in the form of a questionnaire, was conducted in an open pit coal mine involving 476 mineworkers. The goals were to determine factors with the biggest influence on risk and to create a model for predicting the behavior of mining workers. Results and conclusions: The obtained results indicate that leadership plays an important role in worker behavior. A supportive leadership style results in more responsible employee behavior and a lower probability of deviation to rules and procedures. The result also indicates that the safe behavior of workers is strongly influenced by the difficult to control factor of "life satisfaction". It has also been found that riskier work and longer work experience increases the likelihood of breaking the rules. Research limitations/implications: The obtained results are partly influenced by national culture. Practical implications: The obtained results indicate the need for continuous improvement in the risk management process and the rules and procedures by applying worker feedback.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

human factor; risk perception; rules; deviation from rules

PL

czynnik ludzki; postrzeganie ryzyka; zasady; odstępstwo od zasad

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: nr 2
• Strony: 43--58
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kirin Snezana

• Innovation Center, Innovation Center of Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Miljanovic Igor

• Applied Computing and System Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Brzakovic Miodrag

• Economics and Finance, Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance (MEF), Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Trisovic Natasa

• Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade, Serbia

Bibliografia

• 1. AFNOR Certification (2018). The key features of ISO 45001 Certification, 3.
• 2. Bell, J., and Healey, N. (2006). The Causes of Major Hazard Incidents and How to Improve Risk Control and Health and Safety Management: A Review of the Existing Literature. Retrieved from https://www.hse.gov.uk/Research/hsl_pdf/2006/hsl06117.pdf.
• 3. Borella I.L., Borella, M.R. (2016). Environmental Impact and Sustainable Development: An Analysis in the Context of Standards ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and OHSAS 18001. Environmental Quality Management, Vol. 25, Iss. 3, 67-83, DOI: 10.1002/tqem.21460.
• 4. Bourrier, M., and Bieder, C. (2013). Trapping Safety Into Rules?: How Desirable or Avoidable Is Proceduralization? UK: Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press.
• 5. Carlsson-Wall, M., Kaarboe, K., Kraus, K., Meidella, A. (2020). Risk Management as Passionate Imitation: The Interconnections Among Emotions, Performance Metrics, and Risk in a Global Technology Firm. ABACUS, doi: 10.1111/abac.12193.
• 6. Chapelle, A. (2018). Operational Risk Management: Best Practices in the Financial Services Industry, chapter 15, 231-233, DOI:10.1002/9781119548997.
• 7. Clarke, S.G. (2000). Safety culture: underspecified and overrated? International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00031.
• 8. Colas, A. (1995). Human Factors and Safety at Electricite de France. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, vol. 9, 2, pp. 213-223, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 108602669500900205.
• 9. EU-OSHA (2015). Second European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER-2). Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
• 10. Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. (2015). Risk Management for Development—Assessing Obstacles and Prioritizing Action. Risk Analysism, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, pp. 193-2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12269.
• 11. Helbo Jespersen, A., Hohnen, P., Hasle, P. (2016). Internal audits of psychosocial risks at workplaces with certified OHS management systems. Safety Science, Vol. 84, pp. 201-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.013.
• 12. Kirin, S., Bozic, M., Brzakovic, M., Vucetic, I. (2015). Challenges of future research in the area of industrial safety. Structural Integrity and Life, 15(2), 71-78. Retrieved from http://divk.inovacionicentar.rs/ivk/ivk15/071-IVK2-2015-SK-MB-MB-IV.pdf.
• 13. Kirin, S., Stanojevic, P., Miljanovic, I., Sedmak, A., Peric, T., Ilic, P. (2015). Influence of the human factor on risks in an open pit mine. Structural Integrity and Life, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 117-128. Retrieved from http://divk.inovacionicentar.rs/ivk/ivk15/117-IVK2-2015-SK-PS-IM-AS-TP-PI.pdf.
• 14. Laurence, D. (2005). Safety rules and regulations on mine sites – The problem and a solution. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 36, pp. 39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.11.004.
• 15. Moura, R., Beer, M., Patelli, E., Lewis, J., Knoll, F. (2017). Learning from accidents: Interactions between human factors, technology and organisations as a central element to validate risk studies. Safety Science, Vol. 99, Part B, pp. 196-214, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.001.
• 16. Parker, A.W., Tones, M.J., Ritchie, G.E. (2017). Development of a multilevel health and safety climate survey tool within a mining setting. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 62, pp. 173-180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.007.
• 17. Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management. Risk Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 6, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x.
• 18. Rowan, K.E. (1994). Why Rules for Risk Communication Are Not Enough: A Problem. Solving Approach to Risk Communication, 14(3), 365-374, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00253.x.
• 19. Siebert, J.U., Kunz, R.E., Rolf, P. (2020). Effects of proactive decision making on life satisfaction. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 280, Iss. 3, pp. 1171-1187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.011.
• 20. Synowiec, A. (2020). Global competence: A prerequisite for a global labor market and a challenge for education. Organization & Management, Vol. 1, No. 49, pp. 129-138, DOI: 10.29119/1899-6116.2020.49.9.
• 21. Weissbrodt, R., Giauque, D. (2017). Labour inspections and the prevention of psychosocial risks at work: A realist synthesis. Safety Science, Vol., part A, pp. 110-124, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.012.
• 22. Xia, N., Griffin, M.A., Wang, X., Liu, X., Wang, D. (2018). Is there agreement between worker self and supervisor assessment of worker safety performance? An examination in the construction industry. Journal of Safety Research Vol. 65, pp. 29-37. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.03.001.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).