PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Transport mode choice among off-campus students in a hilly environment: the case of Aizawl, India

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In recent years, the transport mode choice of students of higher educational institutions has become a subject of increasing interest. Investigating the modal choice of students, who form a considerable section of the population, is crucial for sustainable urban transport planning and understanding the quality of life of students. Reviews of previous studies have indicated that hilly cities in less developed countries are neglected in transportation studies. The present paper investigates the travel behaviour of non-local, off-campus college students in Aizawl – a fast-growing hilly city in northeast India. The study found that transport mode choices are influenced by interrelated factors, including socio-economic background, demographic, availability of transport mode and location of housing. It was also found that walking and public buses are the most preferred modes of commuting among the studied college students. Female students who rent houses near their colleges are more likely to walk than their male counterparts. On the other hand, male students belonging to high-income families tended to travel by private vehicles from their residences, which are located relatively far away from colleges. The study argues for the enhancement of the intake capacity of residential hostels inside the campus to improve the growing transport problem of off-campus students in the city.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
163--172
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 33 poz.
Twórcy
  • Mizoram University, Department of Geography & Resource Management; Aizawl, Mizoram, India
  • Mizoram University, Department of Geography & Resource Management; Aizawl, Mizoram, India
Bibliografia
  • 1. Whalen, K.E. & Páez, A. & Carrasco, J.A. Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel. Journal of Transport Geography. 2013. Vol. 31. P. 132-142.
  • 2. Nguyen-Phuoc, D.Q. & Currie, G. & De Gruyter, C. & Young, W. How do public transport users adjust their travel behaviour if public transport ceases? A qualitative study. Transportation Research Part F. 2018. Vol. 54. P. 1-14.
  • 3. Zhou, J. From better understandings to proactive actions: Housing location and commuting mode choices among university students. Transport Policy. 2014. Vol. 33. P. 166-175.
  • 4. Black, C. & Collins, A. & Snell, M. Encouraging walking: the case of journey-to-school trips in compact urban areas. Urban Studies. 2001. Vol. 38. P. 1121-1141.
  • 5. Singh, N. & Vasudevan, V. Understanding school trip mode choice – The case of Kanpur (India). Journal of Transport Geography. 2018. Vol. 66. P. 283-290.
  • 6. Christie, H. & Munro, M. & Rettig, H. Accommodating Students. Journal of Youth Studies. 2002. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 209-235.
  • 7. JLL & FICCI. Co-living: Reshaping rental housing in India. 2019. Available at: https://ficci.in/events/24295/ISP/Co-living_Reshaping-Rental-Housing-India.pdf.
  • 8. Meeder, M. & Aebi, T. & Weidmann, U. The influence of slope on walking activity and the pedestrian modal share. Transport Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 27. P. 141-147.
  • 9. Müller, S. & Mejia-Dorantes, L. & Kersten, E. Analysis of active school transportation in hilly urban environments: A case study of Dresden. Journal of Transport Geography. 2020. Vol. 88. P. 102872.
  • 10. Delmelle, E.M. & Delmelle, E.C. Exploring spatio-temporal commuting patterns in a university environment. Transport Policy. 2012. Vol. 21. P. 1-9.
  • 11. Boyd, B. & Chow, M. & Johnson, R. & Smith, A. Analysis of effects of fare-free transit program on student commuting mode shares: BruinGo at the University of California at Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2003. Vol. 1835. P. 101-110.
  • 12. Limanond, T. & Butsingkorn, T. & Chermkhunthod, C. Travel behavior of university students who live on campus: A case study of a rural university in Asia. Transport Policy. 2011. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 163-171.
  • 13. Uttley, J. & Lovelace, R. Cycling promotion schemes and long-term behavioural change: A case study from the University of Sheffield. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2016. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 133-142.
  • 14. Hasnine, Md.S. & Lin, T.Y. & Weiss, A & Habib, K.N. Determinants of travel mode choices of post-secondary students in a large metropolitan area: The case of the city of Toronto. Journal of Transport Geography. 2018. Vol. 70. P. 161-171.
  • 15. Ewing, R. & Schroeer, W. & Greene, W. School Location and Student Travel: Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2004. Vol. 1895. P. 55-63.
  • 16. Zhang, R. & Yao, E. & Liu, Z. School travel mode choice in Beijing, China. Journal of Transport Geography. 2017. Vol. 62. P. 98-110.
  • 17. Hu, H. & Xu, J. & Shen, Q. & Shi, F. & Chen, Y. Travel mode choices in small cities of China: A case study of Changting. Transportation Research Part D. 2018. Vol. 59. P. 361-374.
  • 18. Zhou, J. Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transportation Research Part A. 2012. Vol. 46. P. 1013-1029.
  • 19. Pan, H. & Shen, Q. & Zhang, M. Influence of Urban Form on Travel Behaviour in Four Neighbourhoods of Shanghai. Urban Studies. 2009. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 275-294.
  • 20. Ermagun, A. & Samimi, A. Promoting active transportation modes in school trips. Transport Policy. 2015. Vol. 37. P. 203-211.
  • 21. Li, S. & Zhao, P. The determinants of commuting mode choice among school children in Beijing. Journal of Transport Geography. 2015. Vol. 46. P. 112-121.
  • 22. Goeverden, C.D. Van & Boer, E. De. School travel behaviour in the Netherlands and Flanders. Transport Policy. 2013. Vol. 26. P. 73-84.
  • 23. Leslie, E. & Kremer, P. & Toumbourou, J.W. & Williams, J.W. Gender differences in personal, social and environmental influences on active travel to and from school for Australian adolescents. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2010. Vol. 13. No. 6. P. 597-601.
  • 24. Samimi, A. & Ermagun, A. Students’ tendency to walk to school: Case study of Tehran. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2012. Vol. 139. No. 2. P. 144-152.
  • 25. Scheiner, J. School trips in Germany: Gendered escorting practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2016. Vol. 94. P. 76-92.
  • 26. Haybatollahi, M. & Czepkiewicz, M. & Laatikainen, T. & Kyttä, M. Neighbourhood preferences, active travel behaviour, and built environment: An exploratory study. Transportation Research Part F. 2015. Vol. 29. P. 57-69.
  • 27. Wilson, E.J. & Marshall, J. & Wilson, R. & Krizek, K.J. By foot, bus or car: children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environment and Planning A. 2010. Vol. 42. P. 2168-2185.
  • 28. McMillan, T. The relative influence of urban form on a child’s travel mode to school. Transportation Research Part A. 2007. Vol. 41. P. 69-79.
  • 29. Kelly, J.A. & Fu, M. Sustainable school commuting – understanding choices and identifying opportunities: a case study in Dublin, Ireland. Journal of Transport Geography. 2014. Vol. 34. No. 219. P. 221-230.
  • 30. Easton, S. & Ferrari, E. Children’s travel to school – the interaction of individual, neighbourhood and school factors. Transport Policy. 2015. Vol. 44. P. 9-18.
  • 31. Shokoohi, R. & Hanif, N.R. & Dali, M. Influence of the socio-economic factors on children’s school travel. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012. Vol. 50. P. 135-147.
  • 32. Saitluanga, B.L. Towards a sustainable smart city: The case of Aizawl. ORF Special Report 73. New Delhi: ORF. 2018. 15 p.
  • 33. McDonald, M.C. Children’s mode choice for the school trip: the role of distance and school location in walking to school. Transportation. 2008. Vol. 35. P. 23-35.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-f0fdd54f-c96a-4014-a888-e281d121711a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.