Bauhaus and the beginning of mass housing: how residential open building reacts to changes in society

• Autorzy: Struhařík Daniel

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24427/aea-2019-vol11-no3-04

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In current realizations and research papers, we increasingly encounter designs of flexible dwelling houses. Topics such as Residential Open Building, Infill Architecture, or Support / Infill are also interesting due to changing demands of a population and a long period from planning permission to the end of a building process. The hitherto neglected aspect is the origin of thinking about an apartment building as a flexible structure. The question is whether we can already find this topic in the work of the leading Bauhaus representatives. Using the direct research method, the study of historical sources and available literature, we realized that this topic can be found in the work of the Bauhaus architects. Especially because this progressive school saw an architect‘s position in a broader context. Its visionary representatives predicted the rapid development of society and they responded to this by developing a new typology of apartment buildings that allowed a change. The theme of residential open building can be found in the early 20th century especially in the European context. The work of the Bauhaus representatives was ahead of their time and began to consider the apartment building as a variable structure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Residential Open Building; Bauhaus; Walter Gropius; Mies van der Rohe; Adolf Radin

PL

budynek mieszkalny; Bauhaus; Walter Gropius; Mies van der Rohe; Adolf Radin

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Architecturae et Artibus
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 11, no. 3
• Strony: 54--60
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Struhařík Daniel

• Brno University of Technology Faculty of Architecture Poříčí 273/5, 639 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Dale J. (2019), Council on open building [Online]. Retrieved May 15, 2019, from https://www.councilonopenbuilding.org
• 2. Frampton K. (2007), Modern architecture: a critical history (4th ed), New York, N.Y.: Thames & Hudson.
• 3. Geers K. (2012), Atelier Kempe Thill. Hamburg, Hatje Cantz Verlag.
• 4. Gilbreth F. (2010), Bricklaying system (9. ed.), Charleston: Nabu Press.
• 5. Guzik H. (ed.) (2017), Bydlet spolu: kolektivní domy v českých zemích a Evropě ve 20. Století, Řevnice:Ar bor vitae.
• 6. Haas F. (1983), Architektura 20. století (3.rd ed.), Brno: SPN.
• 7. Jones D. (2017), Walter Gropius and the (Not So) Infinite Possibilities of Prefabrication, in: D. Jones, ArcCA 07.4: Architecture California, the journal of the american institute of architects, california council (7 ed.), California: AIA California council.
• 8. Kempe A., Thill O. (2004), Atelier Kempe Thill: specific neutrality, Berlin: AedesBerlin.
• 9. Kendall S. (2013), Open Building Principles [Online]. In Website of dr. Stephen Kendall, Philadelphia: Tianjin University. Retrieved from http://drstephenkendall.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/OB-Principles-copy.pdf
• 10. Kendall S., Teicher J. (2000), Residential open building (2 nd), Spon Press, New York.
• 11. Matuštík R. (1965), Bauhaus, Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo slovenského fondu výtvarných umení.
• 12. Nerdinger W. (Ed.) (2007), Architektur, menschen und ressourcen: baumschlager–eberle 2002–2007, Springer-Verlag, Wien.
• 13. Nový O. (2015), Česká architektonická avantgarda(Vydání druhé), Prostor, Praha.
• 14. Siebenbrodt M., Nerlich K. (ed.) (1997), Bauhaus Výmar: evropská avantgarda 1919-1925 : [katalog výstavy : České muzeum výtvarných umění v Praze, Dům u černé Matky Boží: 3.října 1997-11.ledna 1998], České muzeum výtvarných umění, Praha.
• 15. Störtkuhl B., Ilkosz J. (Eds.) (2019), Adolf Rading in Breslau: Neues Bauen in der Weimarer Republik, Muzeum Architektury we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.
• 16. Svobodová M. (2016), Bauhaus a Československo 1919-1938: studenti, koncepty, kontakty = The Bauhaus and Czechoslovakia 1919-1938 : students, concepts, contacts, KANT, Praha.
• 17. Šlapeta, V. (1998), Praha: architektura XX. století (2. rozšíř. vyd), Zlatý řez, Praha.
• 18. Teige K. (1932), Nejmenší byt, Václav Petr, Praha.
• 19. Teige K.(1966),Svět stavby a básně, Československý spisovatel, Praha.
• 20. Till J., Schneider T. (2005), Flexible housing: The means to the end. Architectural Research Quarterly, 9(3/4), 287-296. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/S1359135505000345.
• 21. Vašourková Y. (2011), Trvalá adaptabilita, „Zlatý Řez“, 2011(34).
• 22. Zuidema R. (2015), Open Building as the basis for Circular Economy Buildings, in: Proceedings of the Future of Open Building Conference (pp. 1-11). Zurich: ETH Zürich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a010578376