Comparative analysis of the accessibility and connectivity of public transport in the city districts of Krakow

• Autorzy: Bárta Martin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/2543859XPKG.20.016.12784

Warianty tytułu

PL

Analiza porównawcza dostępności i łączności transportu publicznego w dzielnicach Krakowa

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A properly functioning public transport is one of the most important components of urban mobility for the population. Due to spatial inhomogeneity and overall socio-economic differences within a city, there are often considerable disproportions in the quality of transport services within its districts. Also, the city of Krakow is no exception in this case. For a comparison of public transport accessibility in 18 Krakow districts, 7 major quantitative and 5 minor indicators were created. These indicators include the most important characteristics of transport services such as accessibility, frequency, connectivity of connections, and ratios of tram public transport subsystem. The resulting values give a fairly comprehensive picture of the quality of the transport services. Overall higher values for most indicators occur in the central districts of the city. However, due to the complexity of the observed characteristics, it is possible to discover significant differences in the structure of individual indicators. Peripheral districts reach higher amplitudes, which means that in some aspect they have even better transport services than the city center. Yet, at the same time, we also find opposite extremes here, highly below-average values for most other indicators. A detailed analysis of the results provides a unique perspective on the disparities among districts. It can also serve for specific identification of strengths and weaknesses of transport services and its possible optimization.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

comparative analysis; Krakow; public transport indicators; public transport connectivity; public transport accessibility

PL

analiza porównawcza; Kraków; transport publiczny; łączność transportu publicznego; dostępność transportu publicznego

• Wydawca: Komisja Geografii Komunikacji Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego ; Uniwersytet Gdański. Katedra Geografii Rozwoju Regionalnego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: nr 23(3)
• Strony: 7--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bárta Martin

• Department of Regional Geography, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 1192/12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czechia

Bibliografia

• [1] BIP-Miasto Kraków, 2019, https://www.bip.krakow.pl/?dok_id=105105 [6. 6. 2019].
• [2] BIP-Miasto Kraków, 2020, https://www.bip.krakow.pl/?dok_id=167&sub_dok_id=167&sub=uchwala&query=id%3D11303%26typ%3Du [12. 1. 2020].
• [3] Bok J., Kwon Y., 2016, Comparable Measures of Accessibility to Public Transport Using the General Transit Feed Specification, Sustainability, 8(3), 224-237. (DOI: 10.3390/su8030224).
• [4] Bryniarska Z., 2012, Wykorzystanie przystanków sieci publicznego transportu zbiorowego w Krakowie, Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 9(7), 4-9.
• [5] Drdla P., 2018, Osobní doprava regionálního a nadregionálního významu, Univerzita Pardubice, Dopravní fakulta Jana Pernera, Pardubice.
• [6] Fuglsang M., Hansen H. S., Münier B., 2011, Accessibility Analysis and Modelling in Public Transport Networks – A Raster Based Approach, [in:] Murgante B., Gervasi O., Iglesias A., Taniar D, Apduhan B. O. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2011, Springer, Santander, 207-224.
• [7] Gadziński J., Beim M., 2010, Public transport accessibility in Poznań, [in:] Schrenk M., Popovich V. V., Zeile P. (eds) REAL CORP 2010 “Cities for everyone. Liveable, Healthy, Prosperous”, CORP, Wien, 581-590.
• [8] GIS-Support, 2020, https://gis-support.pl/granice-admin-istracyjne/ [12. 1. 2020].
• [9] GUS-Kraków, 2020, https://krakow.stat.gov.pl/ [12. 1. 2020].
• [10] Horak J., Ivan I., Voženílek V., Tesla J., 2017, Multidimensional Evaluation of Public Transport Accessibility, [in:] Ivan I., Horák J., Inspektor T. (eds) Dynamics in GIscience. GIS OSTRAVA 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer, Cham, 149-164. (DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61297-3_11).
• [11] (Jackiva) Yatskiv I., (Budiloviča) Budilovic, E., Gromule V., 2017, Accessibility to Riga Public Transport Services for Transit Passengers, Procedia Engineering, 187, 82–88.
• [12] Kisielewski P., Skóra A., 2016, Analiza dostępności czasowo-przestrzennej połączeń komunikacji miejskiej na wybranych przykładach, Autobusy: technika, eksploatacja, systemy transportowe, 17(4), 49-53.
• [13] Krakowski Tramwaj Wodny, 2020, http://tramwajwodny.net.pl/index.html [12. 1. 2020].
• [14] Mościcka A., Pokonieczny K., Wilbik A., Wabiński J., 2019, Transport Accessibility of Warsaw: A Case Study, Sustainability, 11(19), 5536-5557.
• [15] Murray A. T., Davis R., Stimson R. J., Ferreira L., 1998, Public Transportation Access, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319-328.
• [16] MPK Kraków – rozkłady, http://rozklady.mpk.krakow.pl/ [6. 6. 2019].
• [17] Puławska S., 2014, Preliminary results of experiment concerning evaluation of Krakow public transport accessibility, Logistyka, 17(4), 3197-3206.
• [18] Puławska S., 2018, Modelowanie dostępności miejskiego transportu zbiorowego, Rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Krakowska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej.
• [19] Saghapour T., Moridpour S., Thompson R. G., 2016, Public transport accessibility in metropolitan areas: A new approach incorporating population density, Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 273-285.
• [20] Soczówka A., 2013, Public transportation accessibility in the Katowice conurbation, Poland, Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 1(4), 52-63.
• [21] Yan-yan C., Pan-yi W., Jian-hui L., Guo-chen F., Xin L., Yi G., 2016, An Evaluating Method of Public Transit Accessibility for Urban Areas Based on GIS, Procedia Engineering, 137, 132-140.