Organizacja jako złożony system adaptacyjny

• Autorzy: Kowalska-Styczeń A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Organization as complex adaptive system

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule przedstawiono koncepcję traktowania organizacji jako złożonego systemu adaptacyjnego (CAS). Wskazano cechy, jakie spełnia taki system, a także sposób, w jaki odnoszą się one do systemu społecznego, którym jest organizacja. Podano również przykłady narzędzi i metod, odzwierciedlających złożony charakter procesów zachodzących w CAS i stosowanych do ich badania. Są to symulacja, modele agentowe - w szczególności automaty komórkowe. W pracy pokazano także przykłady badań zjawisk zachodzących w organizacji w kontekście złożonego systemu adaptacyjnego z zastosowaniem modelu opartego na automacie komórkowym.

EN

The paper presents the concept of treatment the organization as a complex adaptive system (CAS). The characteristics of the system, as well as the way in which they relate to the social system which is the organization are shown. Examples of tools and methods that reflect the complexity of the processes occurring in the CAS and are used for their study were also presented. It is a simulation, agent-based models - especially cellular automata. In addition, the article shows examples of studies of phenomena occurring in the organization in the context of a complex adaptive system using a model based on cellular automaton.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

organizacja; złożony system adaptacyjny; symulacja; modele agentowe; automat komórkowy

EN

organization; complex adaptive systems; simulation; agent-based model; cellular automata

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: z. 80
• Strony: 179--188
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kowalska-Styczeń A.

• Politechnika Śląska, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania

Bibliografia

• 1. Anderson P.: Complexity Theory and Organization Science, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1999, s. 216-232.
• 2. Ashby W.R.: Self-regulation and Requisite Variety in Systems Thinking, ed. by F.E. Emery, Penguin 1969.
• 3. Bak P., Tang C., Wiesenfeld K.: Self - organized criticality, Physical Review A 38, 1988, p. 364-374.
• 4. Barry G.L., Park S.: Asynchronous Time Evolution in an Artificial Society Model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2000.
• 5. Bar-Yam Y., Longman A.W.: Dynamics of Complex Systems, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc, 1997.
• 6. Burkhart R.: The SWARM simulator: Applications in science and business. Embracing Complexity: Exploring the Application of Complex Adaptive Systems to Business, Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation, Cambridge MA, 1996.
• 7. Burt R.S.: Secondhand brokerage: evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2007, p. 119-148.
• 8. Carroll G., Harrison J.R.: Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 43, 1998, p. 637-667.
• 9. Checkland P.: Systems thinking, systems practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1981.
• 10. Davis J.P., Eisenhardt K.M., Bingham C.B.: Developing theory through simulation methods, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2007, p. 480-499.
• 11. Epstein J.M., Axtell R.: Artificial societies and generative social science, Artificial Life and Robotics, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 1997, p. 33-34.
• 12. Fioretti G.: Agent-Based Simulation Models in Organization Science, Organizational Research Method, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012.
• 13. Forkmann S., Wang D., Henneberg S.C., Naudé P., Sutcliffe A.: Strategic decision making in business relationships: A dyadic agent-based simulation approach, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2012, p. 816-830.
• 14. Gilbert N., Terna P.: How to build and use agent-based models in social science, 1999.
• 15. Gilbert N., Troitzsch K.G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, Great Britain by Bell & Bain Ltd, Glasgow, 2005.
• 16. Goldstein J.: Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1999, p. 49-72.
• 17. Gotts N.M., Polhill J.G., Law A.N.R.: Agent-Based Simulation in the Study of Social Dilemmas, Artificial Intelligence Review, 19, 2003, p. 3-92.
• 18. Kauffman S.: Investigations, Oxford University Press, 2000.
• 19. Kowalska-Styczeń A.: A cellular based model as a tool of the organizational culture change analysis, [in:] Rebelo F., Soares M. (eds.): Advances in Usability Evaluation: Part II, CRC Press / Taylor & Francis, 2012.
• 20. Kowalska-Styczeń A.: Automaty komórkowe w modelowaniu procesów przywództwa w organizacjach, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Organizacja i Zarządzanie, z. 64, Gliwice 2013, s. 147-155.
• 21. Kowalska-Styczeń A.: Symulowanie złożonych procesów ekonomicznych za pomocą automatów komórkowych, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice 2007.
• 22. Kreps D.M.: Corporate culture and economic theory w J. E. Alt & K. A. Shepsle (eds.): Perspectives on positive political economy, [in:] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York1990, p. 90-143.
• 23. Law A.M., Kelton D.W.: Simulation modeling and analysis (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York 1991.
• 24. Macal C.M., North M.J.: Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation, Journal of Simulation, Vol. 4, 2010, p. 151-162.
• 25. Mainzer K.: Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind, Springer, New York 1994.
• 26. Miller J. H., Page S. E., Complex Adaptive Systems, Princeton University Press, 2007.
• 27. Mitleton-Kelly E.: Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures, [in:] Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives of organizations: The application of complexity theory to organizations, E. Mitleton-Kelly (ed.), Elsevier, London 2003.
• 28. Newman D.: Emergence and strange attractor’, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 63, No. 2, 1996, p. 245-261.
• 29. Owczarek T.: Competition Between Heterogeneous Agents in Complex Environment, International Journal of Computing, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2012, p. 345-350.
• 30. Plsek P., Greenhalgh T.: The challenge of complexity in health care, British Medical Journal, 323, 2001, p. 625-628.
• 31. Prigogine I., Stengers I.: Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature, Boulder, CO: New Science Library, 1984.
• 32. Rivkin J.W.: Imitation of complex strategies, Management Science, 46, 2000, p. 824-844.
• 33. Rotmans J., Loorbach D.: Complexity and Transition Management, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2009, p. 184-196.
• 34. Rudolph J., Repenning N.: Disaster dynamics: Understanding, the role of quantity in organizational collapse, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 2002, p. 1-30.
• 35. Sanders T.I., McCabe J.A.: The Use of Complexity Science, http://www.hcs.ucla.edu/ DoEreport.pdf, 2003.
• 36. Thompson D.: Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hitl, New York 1967.
• 37. Wolfram S.: A New Kind of Science, Wolfram Media, Inc., 2002.
• 38. Vermeulen B., Pyka A.: The Effects of Supraregional Innovation and Production Collaboration on Technology Development in a Multiregional World: A Spatial AgentBased Model Study, Cellular Automata, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8751, 2014, p. 698-707.
• 39. Zott C.: Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, 2003, p. 97-125.